# LiteLLM vs Rivet.dev

LiteLLM records 576,967 monthly visits with +7.9% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing. Rivet.dev records 21,359 monthly visits with -44.3% growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [LiteLLM](https://openaitools.app/tool/litellm) | [Rivet.dev](https://openaitools.app/tool/rivet-dev) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://litellm.ai | https://rivet.dev |
| Categories | AI API, Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Developer Tools, Open Source AI Models | AI Agent, AI Workflow, AI Developer Tools, AI App Builder |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Freemium, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 576,967 | 21,359 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +7.9% | -44.3% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 228,967 | 10,710 |
| Review Score | 4.8 | 4.5 |
| Saved Count | 5 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## LiteLLM

LiteLLM is an open-source AI gateway and Python SDK designed to remove vendor lock-in from LLM applications. The SDK lets you call models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Vertex AI, Bedrock, Mistral, Azure and dozens of other providers using the same OpenAI-style request format, so switching models is a configuration change rather than a code rewrite. The same project ships an AI Gateway (often called the proxy) that turns that abstraction into a shared service for an entire organization.

That gateway is where most platform teams find the value. It issues virtual keys scoped by team, project or application, tracks spend per key against budgets, applies rate limits (TPM and RPM), and exposes dashboards for request volume, token usage and cost per model. Routing features include load balancing across deployments, automatic fallbacks when a provider fails, retries and budget-based rerouting, plus guardrails for PII masking, prompt-injection detection and secret detection.

The project is genuinely open source with the code on GitHub (BerriAI/litellm) and a very active community. Enterprise features add SSO, audit logs, and support for agents and MCP servers through the same gateway. Notably, LiteLLM supports day-zero access to new models so teams can adopt them as soon as they ship, and it can also serve self-hosted, fine-tuned and internal models behind the same key. Companies cited on the site include NVIDIA, Netflix, Okta, Lemonade and AT&T.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium and open source. The self-hosted LiteLLM gateway and SDK are free under an open-source licence, and a free tier lets you get started immediately. Enterprise plans with SSO, audit logs, SLAs and advanced support are quoted on request via the sales team.

- **OpenAI-compatible API for 100+ LLMs:** Call 100+ providers and 1,800+ models using one request format, so you can swap models without changing application code.
- **Virtual keys, teams and budgets:** Issue scoped keys per team, project or app, set monthly spend caps and see exactly who is driving usage and cost.
- **Routing, load balancing and fallbacks:** Distribute traffic across deployments, retry on failure and automatically fall back to another model or provider when one goes down.
- **Observability and spend tracking:** Dashboards for request volume, tokens and cost per model, with support for logging and analytics integrations.
- **Guardrails and policy controls:** Plug in PII masking, prompt-injection detection and secret-detection guardrails, and manage policies centrally instead of in every app.

**Strengths:** Truly open source with a large GitHub community and self-hosting option; Very broad provider coverage with an OpenAI-compatible interface; Enterprise-grade controls: virtual keys, budgets, rate limits and audit logs; Day-zero support for new models and easy fallback when providers fail

**Limitations:** Self-hosting means you own deployment, upgrades and uptime; Feature depth varies between the free open-source version and enterprise plan; The breadth of configuration options can be overwhelming for small projects

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/litellm.md)

## Rivet.dev

At its core Rivet replaces the container per agent with an in-process primitive. An Actor runs inside your existing Node.js or Bun backend rather than in its own container or VM, which is why Rivet reports cold starts measured in single-digit milliseconds and a footprint of tens of kilobytes per Actor instead of hundreds of megabytes. Each Actor carries a SQLite database for memory, can access a filesystem and shell, sleeps when idle, and wakes with its durable state ready for the next request.

The platform handles the operational pieces teams usually build themselves: fault tolerance that reschedules Actors when a node goes down, multi-region placement that routes requests to wherever an Actor currently lives, end-to-end type safety where Actor definitions generate client types, and scheduling via cron or self-set timestamps. Storage is pulled apart into two tiers — a fast SSD for instant writes and object storage that settles writes at a fraction of the cost — so running many small databases stays affordable.

Rivet positions itself as infrastructure for the "agentic era" and can be deployed as a managed cloud, inside your own VPC through a bring-your-own-cloud model, or fully self-hosted down to air-gapped networks. It is open source under Apache 2.0, backed by Y Combinator and a16z Speedrun, and integrates with popular coding agents and frameworks.

**Pricing & Plans:** Rivet Cloud uses a plan-plus-nodes model. The control plane is Free ($0) for prototyping, Hobby at $10/month, Team at $120/month, and Enterprise at $900/month, each raising control-plane redundancy, Actor Node caps, and support. Actor Nodes are billed per month on top, from $4.20 (R-5) to $94.50 (R-160). Self-hosting is free and open source under Apache 2.0, and startups from Y Combinator or a16z Speedrun get 50% off the Team plan for 12 months.

- **Durable actors with persistent state:** Every Actor gets a SQLite database and a filesystem, so an agent's memory and progress survive restarts and idle periods without a separate database.
- **Lightweight secure sandboxing:** Run untrusted or AI-generated code on your own infrastructure with fine-grained control over network access, filesystem permissions, and resource limits.
- **Fault tolerance and workflows:** A node failure reschedules its Actors elsewhere with state intact, and multi-step work replays after a crash — with no checkpointing harness to build yourself.
- **Realtime and multiplayer:** Address an Actor directly over HTTP or hold a live WebSocket, and use the React SDK to subscribe components to an Actor's state in real time.
- **One-binary deployment and observability:** Ship with a single stateless Rust binary, embeds storage in S3-compatible buckets, and emits OpenTelemetry traces, metrics, and logs to your existing collector.

**Strengths:** Four-digit millisecond cold starts and a very small per-Actor memory footprint let a single server host far more agents; Open source (Apache 2.0) with a single Rust binary, so it can be self-hosted, run in a VPC, or air-gapped; Durable state via per-Actor SQLite plus object-storage-backed tiers keeps agents restart-safe and cheap; Strong developer ergonomics: typed SDKs, a React SDK, WebSocket networking, and OpenTelemetry baked in

**Limitations:** Requires Node.js or Bun and a working Rust-based control plane deployment for self-hosting, so it favors backend engineers over no-code users; Advanced durability and sandboxing concepts (Actors, WarpDrive storage) carry a learning curve; Managed cloud cost scales with Actor Nodes, which can climb for many mid-sized/sized nodes; Enterprise features like multi-tenancy and hardened compliance guidance sit behind sales conversations

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/rivet-dev.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do LiteLLM and Rivet.dev compare in monthly traffic?

LiteLLM has 576,967 monthly visits, while Rivet.dev has 21,359. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

LiteLLM has a month-over-month growth rate of +7.9%; Rivet.dev has -44.3%.

### How does pricing compare?

LiteLLM: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Freemium and open source. The self-hosted LiteLLM gateway and SDK are free under an open-source licence, and a free tier lets you get started immediately. Enterprise plans with SSO, audit logs, SLAs and advanced support are quoted on request via the sales team. Rivet.dev: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Rivet Cloud uses a plan-plus-nodes model. The control plane is Free ($0) for prototyping, Hobby at $10/month, Team at $120/month, and Enterprise at $900/month, each raising control-plane redundancy, Actor Node caps, and support. Actor Nodes are billed per month on top, from $4.20 (R-5) to $94.50 (R-160). Self-hosting is free and open source under Apache 2.0, and startups from Y Combinator or a16z Speedrun get 50% off the Team plan for 12 months.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [OpenRouter](https://openaitools.app/tool/openrouter-ai) | 19,941,437 | -6.2% | Paid | Provides a massive hosted model catalog with instant access, but requires trusting a third-party platform instead of self-hosting. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/openrouter-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Together AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/together-ai) | 1,645,930 | +64.9% | Freemium, Paid | Hosts high-performance open-weight models directly on dedicated serverless infrastructure, but does not route across external providers. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/together-ai.md) |
| 3 | [OrcaRouter](https://openaitools.app/tool/orcarouter) | 975,300 | -5.2% | Freemium | Delivers automated model failover and budget governance through an API gateway, but with less open-source customization. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/orcarouter.md) |
| 4 | [ZenMux](https://openaitools.app/tool/zenmux) | 444,394 | +16.7% | Freemium, Paid | Unified LLM gateway with failover and analytics, but offers less robust open-source developer SDK support. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/zenmux.md) |
| 5 | [Mastra](https://openaitools.app/tool/mastra) | 318,954 | -5% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The TypeScript framework for building, deploying, and observing AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mastra.md) |
| 6 | [Portkey](https://openaitools.app/tool/portkey-ai) | 195,650 | -9.4% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Offers advanced enterprise observability and guardrail tools, but lacks LiteLLM's lightweight self-hosted proxy simplicity. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/portkey-ai.md) |
| 7 | [Agent 37](https://openaitools.app/tool/agent-37) | 180,030 | +24.2% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | The low-cost cloud sandbox where AI agents actually live | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/agent-37.md) |
| 8 | [Eden AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/eden-ai) | 173,828 | +6.5% | Paid, Contact for Pricing | Provides managed multi-provider AI routing and cost tracking, but lacks the native open-source flexibility of LiteLLM. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/eden-ai.md) |
| 9 | [LLM Gateway](https://openaitools.app/tool/llm-gateway) | 168,426 | -14.5% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | An open-source alternative for unifying LLM providers, but features a less extensive ecosystem of middleware integrations. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/llm-gateway.md) |
| 10 | [Coder](https://openaitools.app/tool/coder) | 149,417 | -12.8% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Self-hosted cloud development environments and AI coding agents for enterprise teams | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/coder.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/litellm-vs-rivet-dev

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)