# Mindgard vs Relyable

Mindgard records 153,455 monthly visits with +1.3% month-over-month growth and Contact for Pricing pricing. Relyable records 3,451 monthly visits with -45.5% growth and Freemium, Paid pricing.

| Metric | [Mindgard](https://openaitools.app/tool/mindgard) | [Relyable](https://openaitools.app/tool/relyable) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://mindgard.ai | https://relyable.ai |
| Categories | AI Testing, Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Developer Tools | AI Testing, AI Monitor, AI Voice Assistants, AI Agent |
| Pricing Model | Contact for Pricing | Freemium, Paid |
| Monthly Visits | 153,455 | 3,451 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +1.3% | -45.5% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 21,556 | 1,348 |
| Review Score | 4.3 | 4.7 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Mindgard

Mindgard is an AI security platform that approaches protecting AI systems the way an attacker would. Instead of starting with a checklist of prompts, it begins with agent-native reconnaissance: profiling the models, agents, tools, instructions, permissions and behaviours that make up an AI system, so it can identify the attack paths most likely to cause real damage. That reconnaissance is fed by vulnerability intelligence drawn from the company's own published disclosures.

The platform spans the full security loop. Recon surfaces what an AI deployment can actually do; red teaming continuously tests agents and systems against evolving attacks; assessment validates which weaknesses are genuinely exploitable and quantifies their impact; runtime protection and remediation guidance help teams close gaps and verify that defences hold as the system changes. This matters because AI behaviour shifts with every model update, prompt change or new tool integration, which makes one-off testing insufficient.

Mindgard originated from more than a decade of AI security research at Lancaster University and says its technology has been behind 175+ publicly disclosed vulnerabilities in prominent AI systems. It is designed to slot into existing engineering workflows through APIs, CI/CD pipelines and Burp Suite integration, so AI security assessment can run before deployment and continuously in production rather than as a periodic external exercise.

**Pricing & Plans:** Mindgard does not publish public pricing. Plans are quoted based on scope, deployment model and enterprise requirements. Contact the team for a demo and custom quote.

- **Attacker-style AI reconnaissance:** Agent-native reconnaissance maps models, agents, tools, instructions, permissions and behaviours the way an attacker would before launching attacks.
- **Continuous AI red teaming:** Continuous, adaptive testing of AI agents and systems against evolving attack techniques, rather than one-off audits.
- **Proprietary vulnerability intelligence:** Findings are backed by a knowledge base built from more than 175 publicly disclosed AI vulnerabilities across major AI systems.
- **Remediation and runtime protection:** Runtime protections and remediation guidance help close defensive gaps and verify that fixes actually hold.
- **Governance and compliance support:** Risk reduction, evidence and reporting aligned to AI policies and governance requirements, keeping AI compliant as it changes.

**Strengths:** Attacker-led methodology focuses on provably exploitable risk rather than generic prompt noise; Backed by a decade of Lancaster University AI security research and 175+ disclosures; Covers recon, red teaming, assessment, remediation and runtime protection in one platform; Integrates with CI/CD, APIs and Burp Suite for continuous assurance

**Limitations:** Requires a sales conversation; no transparent public pricing; Some capabilities overlap with other AI security vendors, so evaluation takes care; Fully realising value assumes integration into CI/CD and security workflows

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/mindgard.md)

## Relyable

Relyable was built by a team that develops voice agents and treats testing as a first-class part of shipping them. Rather than rely on human spot-checks, it uses AI to create personas and scenarios that mimic real callers — old and angry, young and confident, different accents, moods and goals — and then runs those conversations in parallel against your deployed agent. Each call is analysed automatically, so problems surface before a single real customer encounters them.

Evaluation is driven by a rubric you control. You can weight criteria such as end-to-end task completion, freedom from fabricated policy or pricing, stable customer sentiment, clean interruption handling, latency under a p95 target and appropriate out-of-scope handoff. Relyable tracks pass rates and seven-day trends for each criterion, giving a quantified picture of whether a change helped or hurt.

In production, the platform becomes a monitoring layer. Live calls are logged and scored in real time, and Relyable pages you only when a threshold is crossed — through Slack, email, PagerDuty, Opsgenie, Linear or a webhook. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia, and is associated with NVIDIA Inception, ElevenLabs Grants and Microsoft for Startups.

**Pricing & Plans:** Relyable uses credit-based pricing where credits cover both simulated and live calls. Core is $500/month with 50,000 credits (up to 750 simulated calls and 10,000 live evaluations), and Premium is $1,000/month with 125,000 credits (up to 1,900 simulated calls and 25,000 live evaluations). Annual billing saves about 15%. Enterprise offers custom credit packages, regional compliance and dedicated support.

- **Automated conversation simulation:** Auto-generate test cases from your system prompt or define your own, then run hundreds of parallel simulated conversations with presets for accent, mood and goal.
- **Rubric-based evaluation:** Score every call against weighted, customisable criteria such as task completion, policy accuracy, sentiment, interruption handling and latency, with seven-day trend tracking.
- **Live production monitoring:** Every production call is silently logged and scored in real time, with alerts routed to Slack, email, PagerDuty, Opsgenie, Linear or webhooks when something drifts.
- **No-code platform integrations:** Connect Vapi, Retell or ElevenLabs agents in under five minutes using an API key, or route custom agents through the provided number and API.
- **Industry playbooks:** Hardware and industry templates for financial services, home services and real estate, including compliance, emergency-pathway and booking scenarios.

**Strengths:** Combines simulation, rubric-based evaluation and live monitoring in one platform.; Fast native integrations with Vapi, Retell and ElevenLabs using just an API key.; Rubric weighting and seven-day trend tracking turn voice agent quality into measurable numbers.; Alert routing to Slack, PagerDuty, Linear and webhooks fits existing on-call workflows.

**Limitations:** Pricing starts at $500/month, so it is a significant commitment for very small teams.; Native integrations currently center on Vapi, Retell and ElevenLabs; other platforms require the manual prompt-upload and call-routing workaround.; Evaluation quality still depends on how well you define your rubric and test cases.; Because it targets production voice agents, it is less relevant if you are only experimenting.

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/relyable.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Mindgard and Relyable compare in monthly traffic?

Mindgard has 153,455 monthly visits, while Relyable has 3,451. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Mindgard has a month-over-month growth rate of +1.3%; Relyable has -45.5%.

### How does pricing compare?

Mindgard: Contact for Pricing. Mindgard does not publish public pricing. Plans are quoted based on scope, deployment model and enterprise requirements. Contact the team for a demo and custom quote. Relyable: Freemium, Paid. Relyable uses credit-based pricing where credits cover both simulated and live calls. Core is $500/month with 50,000 credits (up to 750 simulated calls and 10,000 live evaluations), and Premium is $1,000/month with 125,000 credits (up to 1,900 simulated calls and 25,000 live evaluations). Annual billing saves about 15%. Enterprise offers custom credit packages, regional compliance and dedicated support.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Arize AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/arize-com) | 249,028 | +3.2% | Paid, Contact for Pricing | Agent observability, evaluation, and continuous improvement for production AI | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/arize-com.md) |
| 2 | [Hacktron](https://openaitools.app/tool/hacktron) | 125,526 | -40.9% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Automates continuous red teaming and security reviews, but lacks Mindgard's dedicated machine learning vulnerability scanning suite. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/hacktron.md) |
| 3 | [Future AGI](https://openaitools.app/tool/future-agi) | 121,741 | -7.8% | Freemium, Usage-based | Build, simulate, evaluate and monitor self-improving AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/future-agi.md) |
| 4 | [Maxim AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/maxim-ai) | 121,351 | +10% | Contact for Pricing, Free Open Source | Evaluate, monitor, and govern your AI applications in production | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/maxim-ai.md) |
| 5 | [Lakera Guard](https://openaitools.app/tool/lakera-guard) | 88,435 | -24% | Contact for Pricing | Specializes in real-time runtime security against prompt injections, but lacks comprehensive offline model vulnerability scanning. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/lakera-guard.md) |
| 6 | [Confident AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/confident-ai) | 83,400 | -3.3% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Standardize LLM evaluation, observability, and red teaming across your whole org | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/confident-ai.md) |
| 7 | [Cekura](https://openaitools.app/tool/cekura) | 73,228 | -18.9% | Contact for Pricing | Automated QA, simulation and observability for voice and chat AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cekura.md) |
| 8 | [Openlayer](https://openaitools.app/tool/openlayer) | 48,415 | -6.4% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | AI governance, testing, and observability for regulated enterprises | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/openlayer.md) |
| 9 | [Fiddler AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/fiddler-ai) | 44,204 | -10.2% | Contact for Pricing | Delivers enterprise-grade AI observability and model governance, but provides less automated vulnerability red teaming. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/fiddler-ai.md) |
| 10 | [Hamming AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/hamming-ai-yc-s24) | 17,813 | -31.7% | Contact for Pricing | The security layer for voice and chat agents: test, red-team, and monitor every call | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/hamming-ai-yc-s24.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/mindgard-vs-relyable

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)