# Miro vs Qase

Miro records 30,749,206 monthly visits with +1.7% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing. Qase records 319,213 monthly visits with -25.5% growth and Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free pricing.

| Metric | [Miro](https://openaitools.app/tool/miro) | [Qase](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://miro.com | https://qase.io |
| Categories | AI Project Management, AI Workflow, Whiteboard AI, AI Diagram Generator | AI Testing, AI Agent, AI Productivity Tools, AI Developer Tools |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free |
| Monthly Visits | 30,749,206 | 319,213 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +1.7% | -25.5% |
| Primary Market | United States | South Korea |
| Direct Visits | 20,179,618 | 246,413 |
| Review Score | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Saved Count | 40 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Miro

Miro is a visual collaboration platform built around an infinite, multiplayer canvas. Teams use it to run brainstorming sessions, design sprints, workshops, and retrospectives, sketching ideas as sticky notes, shapes, and freeform drawings that everyone can see and edit at the same time. What began as a digital whiteboard has expanded into an "innovation workspace" where the messy early thinking and the structured plan that follows live in one place.

Structured formats are a large part of that expansion. Miro boards can hold Docs, Tables, Slides, Kanban boards, and Timelines, so a research synthesis can flow straight into a roadmap without switching tools. Thousands of templates and prebuilt playbooks cover common ceremonies, from customer journey mapping to technical architecture diagrams. Deep integrations with Jira, Asana, Linear, ClickUp, Slack, and Microsoft let the canvas stay connected to where work actually gets executed.

AI now runs through the product. Miro can generate diagrams, tables, and summaries from board content, clean up images, and connect external assistants such as Claude, Cursor, or Copilot through an MCP server. Paid plans meter these features with AI credits, and enterprise tiers add SSO, governance controls, and advanced security. Pricing starts with a free tier for small teams and scales through per-member plans to custom enterprise agreements.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with three paid paths. Free covers small teams with 3 editable boards, templates, and core formats. Starter runs about $8 per member/month billed yearly with unlimited private boards and 25 AI credits per member. Business is about $20 per member/month billed yearly with workspaces, prototyping, and AI workflows. Enterprise is quoted on request with SSO, governance, and dedicated support.

- **Infinite collaborative canvas:** An infinite multiplayer board where cursors, comments, and live editing let remote and hybrid teams work in the same space simultaneously.
- **Structured formats on the canvas:** Docs, Tables, Slides, Kanban, and Timelines live alongside freeform drawing so a workshop can turn directly into a structured plan.
- **AI diagramming and synthesis:** Generate diagrams, tables, and summaries, remove image backgrounds, and connect external AI assistants through the MCP server.
- **Templates and playbooks:** 6,000-7,000+ templates for brainstorming, workshops, roadmapping, and process mapping give teams a running start.
- **Integrations and two-way sync:** Connect 250+ tools such as Jira, Asana, Linear, Slack, and Microsoft, with two-way sync available for planning workflows.

**Strengths:** Best-in-class infinite canvas that scales from a quick brainstorm to large workshops; Structured Docs, Tables, Slides, and Kanban reduce tool switching; Huge integration and template ecosystem including two-way Jira and Linear sync; Strong enterprise security, SSO, and admin controls for large organizations

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/miro.md)

## Qase

Qase is built around a simple premise: development velocity has outrun QA, and the gap shows up as bulging manual test backlogs and scattered results. The platform pulls CI pipeline output, automated test runs, and manual test execution into one system of record, so a single dashboard answers whether a release is actually safe to ship.

The headline AI capability is practical rather than cosmetic. Qase takes existing manual test cases and converts them into runnable automation scripts for frameworks such as Playwright, Cypress, and Selenium, which means the backlog of untested scenarios can shrink instead of compounding every sprint. Alongside that, requirement traceability links what was asked for to what was actually verified, and release readiness views surface pass rates, coverage gaps, blockers, and flaky tests.

Qase connects deeply with the rest of the toolchain — more than 35 integrations spanning Jira, GitHub, Slack, CI/CD pipelines, and test frameworks from Pytest to PHPUnit. More recently the team added Model Context Protocol support so AI agents can work directly with test data, and launched Tiden, a separate product that extends verification beyond the test phase to agent-written code across the development lifecycle. A free tier and trial make it easy to evaluate before committing.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with a free plan and free trial, plus paid tiers for growing teams. Enterprise and high-volume API use is quoted through sales, and the companion Tiden product is priced separately.

- **Unified system of record:** Manual test cases, automated test runs, and CI pipeline results consolidate into one dashboard so there are no blind spots about coverage or pass rates.
- **Qase AI automations:** Paste a manual test case, choose a framework, and Qase generates an automation script for Playwright, Cypress, or Selenium, shrinking the manual backlog instead of growing it.
- **Requirements traceability:** Bidirectional links connect every requirement to its test cases and results, so when something breaks you can trace exactly what was verified.
- **Release readiness reports:** Pass rates, coverage gaps, blockers, and flaky-test history come together in shareable readiness views for confident go/no-go decisions.
- **35+ integrations and MCP:** Bidirectional connectors for Jira, GitHub, Slack, CI/CD pipelines, and major test frameworks, plus Model Context Protocol access for AI agents.

**Strengths:** One unified view of manual, automated, and CI test results; AI conversion of manual cases into Playwright, Cypress, or Selenium scripts; Strong requirement-to-result traceability and readiness reporting; 35+ bidirectional integrations with Jira, GitHub, Slack, and CI/CD tools

**Limitations:** Feature depth means a real ramp-up period for small teams; Advanced enterprise capabilities sit behind sales-negotiated pricing; The new AI conversion and agentic features are still maturing

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Miro and Qase compare in monthly traffic?

Miro has 30,749,206 monthly visits, while Qase has 319,213. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Miro has a month-over-month growth rate of +1.7%; Qase has -25.5%.

### How does pricing compare?

Miro: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with three paid paths. Free covers small teams with 3 editable boards, templates, and core formats. Starter runs about $8 per member/month billed yearly with unlimited private boards and 25 AI credits per member. Business is about $20 per member/month billed yearly with workspaces, prototyping, and AI workflows. Enterprise is quoted on request with SSO, governance, and dedicated support. Qase: Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free. Freemium with a free plan and free trial, plus paid tiers for growing teams. Enterprise and high-volume API use is quoted through sales, and the companion Tiden product is priced separately.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Whimsical](https://openaitools.app/tool/whimsical) | 966,895 | -18.7% | Freemium | Stronger focus on structured mind mapping and flowcharting, but lacks Miro's massive template library and enterprise workshop features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/whimsical.md) |
| 2 | [KaneAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai) | 901,340 | +13.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Offers an advanced AI-native QA agent for plain-language test authoring, but is less traditional test management-focused. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai.md) |
| 3 | [Jam](https://openaitools.app/tool/jamgpt) | 570,598 | -6% | Freemium, Paid | Screen recorder that captures bugs with full technical context | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jamgpt.md) |
| 4 | [Eraser](https://openaitools.app/tool/eraser) | 534,396 | -23.6% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Excels at generating technical architecture diagrams directly from code, but less suited for freeform creative brainstorming. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/eraser.md) |
| 5 | [Boardmix](https://openaitools.app/tool/boardmix-online-whiteboard) | 447,560 | -6.2% | Freemium | Similar collaborative online whiteboard experience with strong AI diagramming, but offers fewer complex enterprise integration options. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/boardmix-online-whiteboard.md) |
| 6 | [Flowith](https://openaitools.app/tool/flowith) | 324,679 | -27.3% | Contact for Pricing | Features a spatial visual canvas integrated with multi-model chat agents, but less focused on team workshop facilitation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/flowith.md) |
| 7 | [MyMap.AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/mymap-ai) | 206,056 | -6.6% | Freemium | Converts natural language conversations directly into structured mind maps, though offering less versatile general drawing tools. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mymap-ai.md) |
| 8 | [Cloudairy](https://openaitools.app/tool/cloudairy) | 179,162 | -13% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Combines whiteboarding and documentation in one cloud workspace, though with a smaller ecosystem than Miro. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cloudairy.md) |
| 9 | [MockFlow](https://openaitools.app/tool/mockflow) | 177,254 | -7.9% | Freemium, Paid | Specializes in UI wireframing alongside whiteboard collaboration, but less ideal for large-scale enterprise project planning. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mockflow.md) |
| 10 | [Katalon](https://openaitools.app/tool/katalon-studio) | 158,090 | -29.6% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Provides comprehensive test management and execution across web, mobile, and APIs, though with a heavier desktop footprint. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/katalon-studio.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/miro-vs-qase

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)