# Miro vs Runner

Miro records 30,749,206 monthly visits with +1.7% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing. Runner records 0 monthly visits with — growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Miro](https://openaitools.app/tool/miro) | [Runner](https://openaitools.app/tool/runner) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://miro.com | https://runner.now |
| Categories | AI Project Management, AI Workflow, Whiteboard AI, AI Diagram Generator | AI Assistant, AI Productivity Tools, AI Workflow, AI Meeting Assistant |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 30,749,206 | 0 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +1.7% | — |
| Primary Market | United States | Global |
| Direct Visits | 20,179,618 | 0 |
| Review Score | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Saved Count | 40 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Miro

Miro is a visual collaboration platform built around an infinite, multiplayer canvas. Teams use it to run brainstorming sessions, design sprints, workshops, and retrospectives, sketching ideas as sticky notes, shapes, and freeform drawings that everyone can see and edit at the same time. What began as a digital whiteboard has expanded into an "innovation workspace" where the messy early thinking and the structured plan that follows live in one place.

Structured formats are a large part of that expansion. Miro boards can hold Docs, Tables, Slides, Kanban boards, and Timelines, so a research synthesis can flow straight into a roadmap without switching tools. Thousands of templates and prebuilt playbooks cover common ceremonies, from customer journey mapping to technical architecture diagrams. Deep integrations with Jira, Asana, Linear, ClickUp, Slack, and Microsoft let the canvas stay connected to where work actually gets executed.

AI now runs through the product. Miro can generate diagrams, tables, and summaries from board content, clean up images, and connect external assistants such as Claude, Cursor, or Copilot through an MCP server. Paid plans meter these features with AI credits, and enterprise tiers add SSO, governance controls, and advanced security. Pricing starts with a free tier for small teams and scales through per-member plans to custom enterprise agreements.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with three paid paths. Free covers small teams with 3 editable boards, templates, and core formats. Starter runs about $8 per member/month billed yearly with unlimited private boards and 25 AI credits per member. Business is about $20 per member/month billed yearly with workspaces, prototyping, and AI workflows. Enterprise is quoted on request with SSO, governance, and dedicated support.

- **Infinite collaborative canvas:** An infinite multiplayer board where cursors, comments, and live editing let remote and hybrid teams work in the same space simultaneously.
- **Structured formats on the canvas:** Docs, Tables, Slides, Kanban, and Timelines live alongside freeform drawing so a workshop can turn directly into a structured plan.
- **AI diagramming and synthesis:** Generate diagrams, tables, and summaries, remove image backgrounds, and connect external AI assistants through the MCP server.
- **Templates and playbooks:** 6,000-7,000+ templates for brainstorming, workshops, roadmapping, and process mapping give teams a running start.
- **Integrations and two-way sync:** Connect 250+ tools such as Jira, Asana, Linear, Slack, and Microsoft, with two-way sync available for planning workflows.

**Strengths:** Best-in-class infinite canvas that scales from a quick brainstorm to large workshops; Structured Docs, Tables, Slides, and Kanban reduce tool switching; Huge integration and template ecosystem including two-way Jira and Linear sync; Strong enterprise security, SSO, and admin controls for large organizations

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/miro.md)

## Runner

Runner is an AI agent platform built around a simple idea: instead of one general assistant, run as many agents as you have customers, each one working a case through to completion. The workflow has three steps. You show Runner how your team handles a process; it validates new agents against a simulation built from your past cases until they match your best teammates across dozens of tests; then it deploys an agent per customer in whatever channel they use, such as email, text or phone.

Earlier messaging framed Runner as an AI chief of staff for founders. The current site has broadened that into an end-to-end process platform for sales, support, operations and finance. Instead of drafting a single follow-up email, Runner runs the whole collection process across every delinquent account; instead of reporting sign-ups, it walks every driver applicant through onboarding. The company cites examples like collecting on 500 past-due accounts with a first payment on a three-year-old invoice, and nearly a 5x lift in response rate (2.6% to 12.6%) for a rideshare driver-activation campaign.

Runner emphasizes control and safety: agents stop rather than guess on uncertain cases, sends are capped, most teams approve every message in the early weeks, and every action is recorded. It also lets you bring your own connectors and keeps your playbook, wording and data private, stating it does not train models on your data. You can set it up by adding a plugin inside Claude Code or talk to the team directly.

**Pricing & Plans:** Runner does not publish public pricing. The site offers a product demo and a contact path ("talk to our team") and a quick self-serve setup via a plugin command inside Claude Code, so cost is arranged directly with the vendor based on team size and usage.

- **Train on your own workflows:** Show Runner how your team handles a process, and it turns your past cases into a realistic test that agents must pass before going live.
- **One dedicated agent per customer:** Run as many agents as you have customers, each working 1:1 in the channel the customer uses — email, text or phone.
- **Customer context from public data:** Agents read LinkedIn to learn who a customer is, where they work and what they post, so outreach and follow-ups stay relevant.
- **Broad app and website access:** Connects to your work apps and internal systems, uses any website (even ones most AIs cannot), and reads files or runs code when a job requires it.
- **Human-in-the-loop safety controls:** When something is uncertain the agent stops and flags it for a person, sends are capped, and every action is logged so you can see what happened and when.

**Strengths:** Scales personal attention by giving each customer their own dedicated agent; Trains and validates against your real past cases before deployment; Works across email, text and phone and connects to your existing apps; Strong human-in-the-loop controls, capped sends and full action logging

**Limitations:** Per-seat or per-agent pricing is not published publicly; Requires setup work to define playbooks, tests and connectors; Best value for high-volume, repetitive processes rather than one-off tasks; Newer positioning means fewer public case studies and third-party reviews

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/runner.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Miro and Runner compare in monthly traffic?

Miro has 30,749,206 monthly visits, while Runner has 0. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Miro has a month-over-month growth rate of +1.7%; Runner has —.

### How does pricing compare?

Miro: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with three paid paths. Free covers small teams with 3 editable boards, templates, and core formats. Starter runs about $8 per member/month billed yearly with unlimited private boards and 25 AI credits per member. Business is about $20 per member/month billed yearly with workspaces, prototyping, and AI workflows. Enterprise is quoted on request with SSO, governance, and dedicated support. Runner: Contact for Pricing. Runner does not publish public pricing. The site offers a product demo and a contact path ("talk to our team") and a quick self-serve setup via a plugin command inside Claude Code, so cost is arranged directly with the vendor based on team size and usage.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Intercom](https://openaitools.app/tool/intercom-com) | 4,471,110 | +2.7% | Free Trial, Paid | AI-first customer service with a natively integrated AI agent | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/intercom-com.md) |
| 2 | [Dialpad](https://openaitools.app/tool/dialpad) | 2,763,687 | +10.7% | Paid | The AI platform for customer experience and business communications | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/dialpad.md) |
| 3 | [Runable](https://openaitools.app/tool/runable) | 1,048,370 | -1.9% | Freemium | One AI agent to build, run and grow the work | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/runable.md) |
| 4 | [Whimsical](https://openaitools.app/tool/whimsical) | 966,895 | -18.7% | Freemium | Stronger focus on structured mind mapping and flowcharting, but lacks Miro's massive template library and enterprise workshop features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/whimsical.md) |
| 5 | [Wajo](https://openaitools.app/tool/wajo) | 743,352 | +469.3% | Freemium | AI action agents that call, book, buy and get it done | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/wajo.md) |
| 6 | [Eraser](https://openaitools.app/tool/eraser) | 534,396 | -23.6% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Excels at generating technical architecture diagrams directly from code, but less suited for freeform creative brainstorming. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/eraser.md) |
| 7 | [Motion](https://openaitools.app/tool/usemotion-com) | 511,886 | -15.5% | Free Trial, Paid | The AI super app for work — tasks, projects, calendar and meetings in one place | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/usemotion-com.md) |
| 8 | [Town](https://openaitools.app/tool/town) | 472,909 | -12.8% | Freemium, Free Trial | An adaptive AI work assistant that learns how you work across inboxes, calendars, chats, and apps | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/town.md) |
| 9 | [Boardmix](https://openaitools.app/tool/boardmix-online-whiteboard) | 447,560 | -6.2% | Freemium | Similar collaborative online whiteboard experience with strong AI diagramming, but offers fewer complex enterprise integration options. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/boardmix-online-whiteboard.md) |
| 10 | [Flowith](https://openaitools.app/tool/flowith) | 324,679 | -27.3% | Contact for Pricing | Features a spatial visual canvas integrated with multi-model chat agents, but less focused on team workshop facilitation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/flowith.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/miro-vs-runner

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)