# Models.dev vs OpenGPT

Models.dev records 200,451 monthly visits with -3.9% month-over-month growth and Free pricing. OpenGPT records 3,559 monthly visits with -24.7% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Models.dev](https://openaitools.app/tool/models-dev) | [OpenGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/opengpt-com) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://models.dev | https://www.opengpt.com |
| Categories | AI Models, AI API, Open Source AI Models, AI Tools Directory | AI Tools Directory, AI Prompt Generator, AI Chatbot, AI Art Generator |
| Pricing Model | Free | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 200,451 | 3,559 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -3.9% | -24.7% |
| Primary Market | China | United States |
| Direct Visits | 136,316 | 1,374 |
| Review Score | 4.4 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 8 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Models.dev

Models.dev exists to answer a very practical developer question: which model should I use, and what will it cost? The site organises every entry under a canonical identifier in the form provider/model, so the same model served by several providers can be compared directly rather than guessed at. Columns cover context window, maximum output, whether input and output are supported, reasoning, tool calling, structured output, temperature control, open versus closed weights, price per million tokens, and release and update dates.

Because model releases move fast, the catalogue is built to stay current, with sortable and searchable tables that let you scan by lab or provider and filter down to what matters. Entries include both closed flagship models and open-weight alternatives, making it useful for cost planning as well as capability research.

The project is open source and free to use, and it is intended to be consumed programmatically. Developers can pull the catalogue into their own tooling through a JSON API or a type-safe SDK, which makes it a practical backend for dashboards, routing logic, or internal cost calculators rather than just a reference page to browse.

**Pricing & Plans:** Models.dev is free and open source. It is a reference database, so the prices it lists are the per-million-token rates charged by the model providers themselves, not a fee for using the site.

- **Canonical model identifiers:** Every model uses a consistent provider/model format so the same model across providers can be compared directly.
- **Specification comparison:** Side-by-side context window, output limit, reasoning, tool calling, structured output, and temperature support.
- **Pricing transparency:** Input and output prices per million tokens listed alongside release and update dates.
- **Open and closed models:** Covers closed flagship APIs and open-weight models from many labs in one sortable catalogue.
- **Developer access:** Consume the catalogue through a JSON API or a type-safe SDK for your own tools and dashboards.

**Strengths:** Free and open source with no account required; Consistent canonical identifiers make cross-provider comparison reliable; Covers pricing, limits, and capabilities in one sortable table; Available as a JSON API and type-safe SDK for programmatic use

**Limitations:** It is a reference catalogue, not an inference or hosting service; Data quality depends on community and maintainer updates keeping pace with releases; Interface is aimed at developers and offers little guidance for non-technical users

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/models-dev.md)

## OpenGPT

OpenGPT has evolved into an AI decision workspace rather than a simple tool hub. The premise is practical: instead of collecting a long list of tools, you start from a task — research and analyze, build software, documents and data, create images or video, create music, write and communicate, automate work, voice and speech, learn and study — and immediately see candidate tools with the differences that matter. You can browse AI model rankings and AI agent rankings, or head straight to the model directory when you need deep detail.

A central idea is comparing actual results rather than marketing claims. OpenGPT does not generate content itself; you try your chosen tools on their own sites, then return and record the results to compare candidates under identical requirements. A saved results area, followed models and recorded needs let you keep track of what worked and get notified about ranking changes through features like Upgrade Radar.

Importantly, OpenGPT states plainly that it is independent and provider-neutral, with no affiliation with or endorsement by OpenAI or other model providers. It publishes ranking methodology, verification reports and a trust and data status page, which makes the site useful as a research and due-diligence layer for teams deciding which AI stack to adopt.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free to use for browsing rankings, comparing models and recording results. Details of any paid tiers are not stated on the homepage.

- **Task-first recommendations:** Pick a task and instantly see candidate tools with the key differences, without writing a prompt or lengthy query.
- **Model and agent rankings:** Browse AI model rankings, AI agent rankings and a detailed model directory with task-level breakdowns.
- **Compare real results:** Run candidates on their own sites, then record outputs on OpenGPT and compare them under the same requirements.
- **Upgrade Radar and change tracking:** Monitor ranking changes and report verification so you know when a better option appears.
- **Transparent methodology:** Ranking methodology, editorial policy and a trust and data status page document how suggestions are produced.

**Strengths:** Starts from tasks rather than an overwhelming tool directory; Compares actual outputs under the same requirements instead of marketing copy; Publishes ranking methodology and verification information for transparency; Explicitly provider-neutral and independent of OpenAI

**Limitations:** Does not generate content itself, so you still need accounts on the tools you test; The site has moved away from the community, GPT store and art-generation features it once advertised; Ranking coverage depends on which providers and tasks OpenGPT tracks

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/opengpt-com.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Models.dev and OpenGPT compare in monthly traffic?

Models.dev has 200,451 monthly visits, while OpenGPT has 3,559. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Models.dev has a month-over-month growth rate of -3.9%; OpenGPT has -24.7%.

### How does pricing compare?

Models.dev: Free. Models.dev is free and open source. It is a reference database, so the prices it lists are the per-million-token rates charged by the model providers themselves, not a fee for using the site. OpenGPT: Freemium. Free to use for browsing rankings, comparing models and recording results. Details of any paid tiers are not stated on the homepage.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [FlowGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/flowgpt) | 1,761,490 | +13.3% | Freemium | A community library of AI prompts and chatbots you can chat with instantly | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/flowgpt.md) |
| 2 | [Design Arena](https://openaitools.app/tool/design-arena) | 949,534 | -13.2% | Free | Crowdsourced arena where AI models compete and humans crown the best design output | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/design-arena.md) |
| 3 | [Stork](https://openaitools.app/tool/stork) | 201,544 | +2.3% | Free | AI 工具目录、深度评测与每日 AI 新闻 | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/stork.md) |
| 4 | [Easy With AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/easywithai-com) | 119,734 | -2.7% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | A hand-curated directory for discovering AI tools and resources | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/easywithai-com.md) |
| 5 | [ChatGPT Shortcut](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-shortcut) | 84,028 | -9.9% | Free | Free, community-curated AI prompt library for ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-shortcut.md) |
| 6 | [ToolCenter](https://openaitools.app/tool/toolcenter) | 66,647 | +3.2% | Free | A curated directory of thousands of AI tools, updated daily. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/toolcenter.md) |
| 7 | [Open Apps](https://openaitools.app/tool/open-apps) | 55,880 | +6.1% | Free | Independently scored open-source alternatives to paid SaaS | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/open-apps.md) |
| 8 | [InfraBase.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/infrabase-ai) | 39,072 | -13.6% | Free | Catalogues and compares AI infrastructure tools and services across categories, but lacks deep per-token pricing tables. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/infrabase-ai.md) |
| 9 | [All GPTs](https://openaitools.app/tool/all-gpts) | 32,569 | +9.3% | Free | A curated directory of 30,000+ custom GPTs and AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/all-gpts.md) |
| 10 | [ToolDirectory.AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/tooldirectory-ai) | 30,123 | +64.9% | Freemium | An editor-reviewed directory of 2,888+ AI tools, dated and marked live or retired | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/tooldirectory-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/models-dev-vs-opengpt-com

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)