# Models.dev vs Wirestock

Models.dev records 200,451 monthly visits with -3.9% month-over-month growth and Free pricing. Wirestock records 167,156 monthly visits with +12.9% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Models.dev](https://openaitools.app/tool/models-dev) | [Wirestock](https://openaitools.app/tool/wirestock) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://models.dev | https://wirestock.io |
| Categories | AI Models, AI API, Open Source AI Models, AI Tools Directory | AI Marketing, AI Art Generator, AI Image Upscaler, AI API |
| Pricing Model | Free | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 200,451 | 167,156 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -3.9% | +12.9% |
| Primary Market | China | United States |
| Direct Visits | 136,316 | 88,179 |
| Review Score | 4.4 | 4 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 13 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Models.dev

Models.dev exists to answer a very practical developer question: which model should I use, and what will it cost? The site organises every entry under a canonical identifier in the form provider/model, so the same model served by several providers can be compared directly rather than guessed at. Columns cover context window, maximum output, whether input and output are supported, reasoning, tool calling, structured output, temperature control, open versus closed weights, price per million tokens, and release and update dates.

Because model releases move fast, the catalogue is built to stay current, with sortable and searchable tables that let you scan by lab or provider and filter down to what matters. Entries include both closed flagship models and open-weight alternatives, making it useful for cost planning as well as capability research.

The project is open source and free to use, and it is intended to be consumed programmatically. Developers can pull the catalogue into their own tooling through a JSON API or a type-safe SDK, which makes it a practical backend for dashboards, routing logic, or internal cost calculators rather than just a reference page to browse.

**Pricing & Plans:** Models.dev is free and open source. It is a reference database, so the prices it lists are the per-million-token rates charged by the model providers themselves, not a fee for using the site.

- **Canonical model identifiers:** Every model uses a consistent provider/model format so the same model across providers can be compared directly.
- **Specification comparison:** Side-by-side context window, output limit, reasoning, tool calling, structured output, and temperature support.
- **Pricing transparency:** Input and output prices per million tokens listed alongside release and update dates.
- **Open and closed models:** Covers closed flagship APIs and open-weight models from many labs in one sortable catalogue.
- **Developer access:** Consume the catalogue through a JSON API or a type-safe SDK for your own tools and dashboards.

**Strengths:** Free and open source with no account required; Consistent canonical identifiers make cross-provider comparison reliable; Covers pricing, limits, and capabilities in one sortable table; Available as a JSON API and type-safe SDK for programmatic use

**Limitations:** It is a reference catalogue, not an inference or hosting service; Data quality depends on community and maintainer updates keeping pace with releases; Interface is aimed at developers and offers little guidance for non-technical users

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/models-dev.md)

## Wirestock

Wirestock sits at the intersection of the creator economy and the AI data economy. On one side, it runs a creator network of photographers, illustrators, graphic designers, videographers and 3D artists who upload work once and then earn commissions, royalties, or payouts from matched freelance projects. The site reports a community of more than 700K creators and a catalog of 50M+ pieces of content, with roughly 1M+ items sourced each month.

On the other side, Wirestock serves AI teams. It packages consented, cleared, multimodal datasets — images, video, illustrations, vector art and 3D assets — and structures them for pretraining, supervised fine-tuning (SFT), reinforcement learning (RL) and RLHF pipelines. Enterprise buyers can also commission custom datasets with rubrics, verifier tasks and expert QA and review built in. Ethically sourced, properly licensed content is the core pitch, which is a meaningful distinction for labs worried about provenance and rights.

Creators typically join by applying to the pool, building a profile, and getting matched with paid projects posted by the platform. Earnings and progress are tracked in a dashboard, and payments land monthly. The model is free to join, with the business monetized through content licensing and data licensing rather than creator subscriptions.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium: joining as a creator and uploading content is free — Wirestock earns through content licensing and commercial data deals. Custom dataset pricing for AI teams is quoted on request; contact the team for current terms.

- **Multimodal training datasets:** Coverage across images, video, illustrations, vector art and 3D assets, structured for pretraining, SFT, RL and RLHF.
- **Custom data solutions:** Bespoke datasets built to specification with rubrics, verifier tasks and expert QA and review.
- **Freelance creative jobs:** Get matched with paid projects in photography, videography, illustration, graphic design and 2D game art.
- **Commission-based licensing:** Upload work once and earn royalties whenever a buyer licenses it through the marketplace.
- **Creator dashboard:** Track earnings, project progress and payouts, with monthly payments to your account.

**Strengths:** Free for creators to join and upload, with monthly payouts; Both sides of the market in one place: content licensing and custom AI datasets; Strong emphasis on ethical sourcing, consent and clear licensing provenance; Broad asset types including video, vector and 3D, not just still images

**Limitations:** Creator earnings and project availability vary with demand, so income is not guaranteed; Enterprise dataset and custom-data pricing is quote-based rather than published; Payouts are monthly, which may be slow for creators who want faster cash flow

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/wirestock.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Models.dev and Wirestock compare in monthly traffic?

Models.dev has 200,451 monthly visits, while Wirestock has 167,156. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Models.dev has a month-over-month growth rate of -3.9%; Wirestock has +12.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Models.dev: Free. Models.dev is free and open source. It is a reference database, so the prices it lists are the per-million-token rates charged by the model providers themselves, not a fee for using the site. Wirestock: Freemium. Freemium: joining as a creator and uploading content is free — Wirestock earns through content licensing and commercial data deals. Custom dataset pricing for AI teams is quoted on request; contact the team for current terms.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Civitai](https://openaitools.app/tool/civitai) | 6,963,136 | +12.8% | Freemium | Serves as a premier community hub for AI art sharing and generation, but lacks commercial dataset licensing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/civitai.md) |
| 2 | [Apify](https://openaitools.app/tool/apify) | 4,147,762 | +3.9% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Run thousands of ready-made web scrapers and AI agents from one cloud platform | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/apify.md) |
| 3 | [ModelScope](https://openaitools.app/tool/modelscope-community) | 3,085,423 | +5.1% | Free | Hosts open-source AI models and datasets for developers, but lacks individual creator art monetization workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/modelscope-community.md) |
| 4 | [Surge AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/surgehq-ai) | 245,142 | +6.6% | Contact for Pricing | Provides expert human data and evaluation for frontier models, but lacks consumer art licensing tools. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/surgehq-ai.md) |
| 5 | [Stork](https://openaitools.app/tool/stork) | 201,544 | +2.3% | Free | Includes model pricing trackers and developer news alongside tools directories, but less focused on raw API specs. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/stork.md) |
| 6 | [Defined.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/definedcrowd-com) | 146,251 | -21% | Contact for Pricing | Focuses on enterprise-grade AI training data and annotation, but lacks Wirestock's artist creator marketplace features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/definedcrowd-com.md) |
| 7 | [InfraBase.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/infrabase-ai) | 39,072 | -13.6% | Free | Catalogues and compares AI infrastructure tools and services across categories, but lacks deep per-token pricing tables. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/infrabase-ai.md) |
| 8 | [SourceBae](https://openaitools.app/tool/sourcebae) | 21,727 | +20.1% | Contact for Pricing | Train AI with domain experts and real-world data | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/sourcebae.md) |
| 9 | [LAION](https://openaitools.app/tool/laion) | 18,486 | -24.1% | Free | Publishes open-source machine learning datasets for research, but lacks commercial artist marketplaces and stock licensing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/laion.md) |
| 10 | [AI Data Collection Company (GTS)](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-data-collection-company) | 13,006 | -17.5% | Contact for Pricing | Human-in-the-loop data collection and annotation for AI and ML models | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-data-collection-company.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/models-dev-vs-wirestock

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)