# MyDetector vs TextSight

MyDetector records 534,478 monthly visits with +1.1% month-over-month growth and Free pricing. TextSight records 51,453 monthly visits with +35.8% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [MyDetector](https://openaitools.app/tool/mydetector) | [TextSight](https://openaitools.app/tool/textsight) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://mydetector.ai | https://textsight.ai |
| Categories | AI Detector, AI Content Detector, Humanizer AI, AI Checker | AI Detector, AI Rewriter, AI Writing, AI Writing Assistants |
| Pricing Model | Free | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 534,478 | 51,453 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +1.1% | +35.8% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 87,613 | 9,643 |
| Review Score | 3.5 | 3.9 |
| Saved Count | 3 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## MyDetector

MyDetector approaches AI detection as a review workflow rather than a single pass-or-fail score. The detector estimates whether a passage was written by a person or a language model by measuring style, structure and wording, then marks and scores individual sentences so you can see exactly which lines triggered the result instead of guessing from a single number. A vocabulary panel adds readability-style insight into the language used.

Input is flexible. You can paste up to 200,000 characters or upload TXT, DOCX, PDF and PPT files, which makes it practical for whole documents rather than only short samples. You can switch between a faster checker model and a deeper analysis model depending on whether speed or detail matters more. Each run is saved to a history list, and a content comparison tool places AI-leaning and human-leaning passages next to each other.

Positioning is honest about the limits: the site states that no detector is fully exact and that structured human writing can be misflagged, so the score should be treated as a signal rather than proof. It supports English, Chinese, Japanese, Spanish, Portuguese, French, Russian, German and more. The site advertises a free trial and free credits on sign-up, with paid plans for higher volume. It is aimed at educators, editors, marketers, legal reviewers and researchers who need a quick originality signal.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free to use, with a free trial and free credits granted after account sign-up. The site advertises paid upgrades for higher volume; specific paid tier prices are not published on the page we reviewed.

- **Sentence-level AI highlighting:** Every flagged sentence is marked and individually scored, so you can locate suspected AI text without re-reading the whole draft.
- **Document upload support:** Detect inside TXT, DOCX, PDF and PPT files instead of copy-pasting, with up to 200,000 characters accepted per run.
- **Selectable detector models:** Switch between a fast checker and a deeper analysis model to balance speed against depth for each task.
- **Text humanization:** After detection, an adjustment step rewrites AI-leaning passages into a more natural human tone and improves flow.
- **History and comparison tools:** Saved run history restores previous inputs and results, while the comparison view sets AI-style and human-style passages side by side.

**Strengths:** Free trial plus free credits on sign-up, so you can test on real documents; Sentence-level scoring is far more actionable than a single percentage; Handles PDF, Word and PowerPoint uploads with a generous 200,000 character limit; Supports ten-plus languages including CJK and Russian

**Limitations:** Paid pricing is not published openly on the main page; No AI detector is exact — structured human writing can be misflagged; Uploaded file processing may be slower than plain text pasting; Humanizer output still needs human review before use

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/mydetector.md)

## TextSight

Most AI-detector sites stop at a percentage. TextSight is built as a workflow instead: you detect, you fix the flagged sentences with the built-in humanizer, and you re-run the check in the same tab to see whether the score actually improved. That loop is the core of the product, and it is why detection and rewriting live under one roof rather than in two separate subscriptions.

Under the hood there is a multi-model detector trained on output from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama and Mistral, a 0–100 Humanization Score, and a rewrite engine that only touches the passages you flag. Around that core sit roughly twenty smaller writing utilities — grammar, readability, paraphrasing, summarisation, translation — plus a Chrome extension and add-ons for Word and Google Docs.

TextSight is unusually forthcoming about the limits of detection. It published a benchmark of 1,180 human-written academic papers from 2018, before GPT-3 existed, and reports a 5.85% false-positive rate on that corpus, with the dataset, analysis script and methodology downloadable. The company explicitly labels this its own testing rather than independent third-party validation, and tells educators to treat any score as one signal rather than proof.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. The free tier gives 3 actions a day (around 1,000 words per scan without an account, ~1,500 with one; 260 words per humanization) using the same detector as paid plans. Starter is $9.99/mo, Pro $19.99/mo, Business $39.99/mo and Enterprise $79.99/mo, with annual billing discounting roughly 63%. Lower tiers include 20 daily actions and 40,000 humanizer words a month; Pro adds file upload and 5,000 API calls; higher tiers add team seats, bulk scanning, SSO and more API volume. No card is required to start, and plans can be changed or cancelled from settings.

- **Sentence-level AI detection:** Every sentence gets its own AI confidence score and colour code inside your text, so you can see which lines to fix instead of reacting to one blunt overall verdict. Sentence-level detail starts on the Starter plan.
- **Humanization Score:** A 0–100 score that rises as your writing becomes more natural, recomputed on every scan so you can watch the number move as you edit.
- **Targeted AI humanizer:** The humanizer rewrites only the passages that read as AI-written, keeping your meaning and tone. Free accounts get around 260 words per rewrite; paid plans add thousands of words a month plus Advanced, Business and Casual modes.
- **Detect, humanize, recheck in one place:** Detection, rewriting and re-scoring happen in one window. After a humanize pass you recheck the same text and compare the before-and-after AI percentage side by side.
- **Writing toolset and integrations:** About 20 supporting tools cover grammar, readability, paraphrasing, summarisation and translation, with a Chrome extension for right-click scanning of any text in your browser and add-ons for Word and Google Docs.

**Strengths:** Detection, humanizing and rechecking all happen in one window with no copy-paste between tabs; The free tier runs the same detector as the paid plans, so accuracy is not paywalled; Sentence-level flags point at specific lines rather than giving a single opaque score; The company publishes its own false-positive benchmark, dataset and methodology

**Limitations:** \"Humanization Score\" and AI probability are its own detector's numbers, so they are not an independent verdict; Heavy users (bulk files, folder libraries, team seats) must move to mid or top tiers; Detector accuracy is calibrated mainly on English text; other languages are weaker; False-positive testing is self-run and the vendor explicitly says it is not third-party validation

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/textsight.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do MyDetector and TextSight compare in monthly traffic?

MyDetector has 534,478 monthly visits, while TextSight has 51,453. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

MyDetector has a month-over-month growth rate of +1.1%; TextSight has +35.8%.

### How does pricing compare?

MyDetector: Free. Free to use, with a free trial and free credits granted after account sign-up. The site advertises paid upgrades for higher volume; specific paid tier prices are not published on the page we reviewed. TextSight: Freemium. Freemium. The free tier gives 3 actions a day (around 1,000 words per scan without an account, ~1,500 with one; 260 words per humanization) using the same detector as paid plans. Starter is $9.99/mo, Pro $19.99/mo, Business $39.99/mo and Enterprise $79.99/mo, with annual billing discounting roughly 63%. Lower tiers include 20 daily actions and 40,000 humanizer words a month; Pro adds file upload and 5,000 API calls; higher tiers add team seats, bulk scanning, SSO and more API volume. No card is required to start, and plans can be changed or cancelled from settings.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [QuillBot Paraphraser](https://openaitools.app/tool/quillbot-paraphraser) | 36,630,337 | +2.3% | Freemium | Paraphrase, proofread and summarize text with an AI writing workspace | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/quillbot-paraphraser.md) |
| 2 | [ZeroGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/zerogpt) | 32,864,541 | +19.7% | Freemium, Paid | AI content detection and a full writing toolkit in one place | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/zerogpt.md) |
| 3 | [GPTZero](https://openaitools.app/tool/gptzero-me) | 23,246,989 | +32.5% | Freemium, Paid | Industry-standard accuracy trusted by educators, though it lacks the integrated side-by-side humanizer view found in MyDetector. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gptzero-me.md) |
| 4 | [HumanizeAI.pro](https://openaitools.app/tool/humanizeai-pro) | 9,652,312 | +26% | Free | Free browser AI humanizer that rewrites AI text to read naturally | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/humanizeai-pro.md) |
| 5 | [Undetectable AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/undetectable-ai) | 3,113,403 | +17.5% | Freemium | Stronger focus on aggressive text humanization to bypass detectors, but features a slightly different reporting dashboard. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/undetectable-ai.md) |
| 6 | [StealthWriter](https://openaitools.app/tool/stealthwriter) | 2,887,114 | +15.5% | Freemium | Humanize AI text and check how human it reads | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/stealthwriter.md) |
| 7 | [Copyleaks](https://openaitools.app/tool/copyleaks) | 2,402,494 | -14.1% | Paid, Contact for Pricing | Enterprise-grade multi-format detection with robust API capabilities, but less oriented toward quick casual single-page humanizing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/copyleaks.md) |
| 8 | [AI Humanize](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-humanize) | 2,152,089 | +8.1% | Freemium, Paid | Turn AI-generated text into natural, human-sounding writing | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-humanize.md) |
| 9 | [Originality.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/originality) | 2,049,639 | +2.8% | Paid | AI detector, plagiarism and content-quality checks in one scan | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/originality.md) |
| 10 | [Walter Writes AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/walter-ai) | 1,474,367 | +24.4% | Freemium | Make AI-written text sound like you wrote it | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/walter-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/mydetector-vs-textsight

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)