# Notta vs Screenify

Notta records 2,585,354 monthly visits with +2% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing. Screenify records 4,326 monthly visits with -17.1% growth and Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Notta](https://openaitools.app/tool/notta) | [Screenify](https://openaitools.app/tool/screenify) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.notta.ai/en | https://screenify.ai |
| Categories | AI Transcriber, AI Speech-to-Text, Audio To Text AI, AI Summarizer | AI Interview Assistant, AI Recruiting, AI Chatbot |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 2,585,354 | 4,326 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +2% | -17.1% |
| Primary Market | Japan | United States |
| Direct Visits | 1,489,035 | 1,694 |
| Review Score | 4.4 | 4 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Notta

Notta is built around one goal: making sure nothing important said in a meeting gets lost. It can join online calls as a bot, record locally on your device without a bot, capture screen and camera, or simply accept uploaded audio, video and YouTube links. Speech is converted to text in real time or after the fact, with bilingual transcription and on-device options for privacy-sensitive situations.

On top of transcripts, Notta layers AI features that do the downstream work: summaries with action items, cross-meeting Q&A through Notta Brain, bilingual real-time translation, shareable infographics, generated presentations, document creation for PDF, Word and Excel, and follow-up email drafts. It also exposes an MCP server and CLI so AI agents can pull meeting context directly.

Integration and compliance are treated seriously — native connections with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Webex, Slack, Notion, Salesforce and Google Drive, plus SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR and HIPAA alignment. A generous free tier and modest paid plans make it accessible for individual professionals before scaling to teams.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free plan with 120 transcription minutes per month and full transcription features. Paid Pro plans start around $8.17 per month when billed annually, with higher tiers and enterprise options; a contact-based plan is available for organizations.

- **Flexible recording and import:** Record online meetings with a bot, record bot-free on desktop or mobile, capture screen and camera, or upload audio, video and YouTube links.
- **58-language transcription:** Transcribe and translate in 58 languages, with real-time, bilingual and on-device transcription modes.
- **AI notes and summaries:** Generate summaries, action items and key decisions automatically, then ask questions across all your meetings.
- **Visual and document output:** Turn discussions into infographics, presentations, PDF, Word and Excel documents, and ready-to-send follow-up emails.
- **Integrations and compliance:** Connect Zoom, Meet, Teams, Webex, Slack, Notion and Salesforce, with SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR and HIPAA alignment.

**Strengths:** Reliable transcription with very broad language coverage; Strong privacy and compliance posture including on-device mode; Deliverables go beyond text into slides, infographics and documents; Wide list of native integrations with common business tools

**Limitations:** Free minutes are limited and can run out quickly with heavy meeting loads; AI summary quality depends on audio clarity and speaker separation; Advanced visual and document features are tied to paid tiers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/notta.md)

## Screenify

Screenify positions itself as a fully automated screener rather than another skills-assessment tool. The company reports that customers see around a 33% reduction in time to hire, 10x more hiring capacity, and up to 90% lower hiring costs, figures it attributes to removing scheduling back-and-forth and manual first-round screening. Customer testimonials cited on the site mention over 80% alignment between Screenify's evaluations and internal team assessments, which is the kind of claim worth validating against your own roles during a trial.

The workflow is deliberately simple. A recruiter builds the interview, writes the questions and scoring criteria, and sends invitations to applicants. Candidates receive an email with a custom intro video and then complete the conversation on Google Meet or Zoom at any hour, which removes the usual scheduling friction and tends to improve completion rates. Screenify then returns scored summaries so the hiring team can shortlist quickly.

Integration is handled through applicant tracking systems as well as non-ATS tools such as Typeform and Airtable, and companies without an ATS can still share candidate details inside the platform. Plans scale by job role and interview volume, with a 7-day free trial on paid tiers and custom pricing for high-volume or private-infrastructure requirements.

**Pricing & Plans:** Screenify uses volume-based pricing with a 7-day free trial on paid plans: Starter at $149/month covers 1 job role and up to 100 interviews per month, Growth at $629/month covers up to 5 job roles, 500 interviews, up to 3 integrations, and custom branding, and larger requirements are quoted custom. Credits are only charged for interviews that candidates start and join.

- **Fully automated screening:** Create an interview, define scoring criteria, and send invitations automatically so screening, scheduling, and feedback collection happen without manual coordination.
- **Adaptive, personalised interviews:** Every interview is tailored to the role and the candidate's experience, and the AI follows up on responses the way a human interviewer would.
- **Consistent AI scoring:** Candidates are scored against your company's criteria using AI evaluation, which reduces interviewer bias and keeps comparisons fair across applicants.
- **Candidate-friendly experience:** Applicants get an email invite, a custom intro video, and the freedom to interview any time through Google Meet or Zoom, with your own branding throughout.
- **ATS and workflow integrations:** Connect Screenify to your ATS or to no-code tools like Typeform and Airtable so candidate data flows into the systems you already use.

**Strengths:** Fully automates first-round screening, scheduling, and feedback collection; Candidates can interview any time via Google Meet or Zoom, improving completion rates; AI scoring applies your criteria consistently and reduces interviewer bias; Works with ATS platforms as well as non-ATS tools like Typeform and Airtable

**Limitations:** Pricing starts at $149/month, which is steep for very small teams or occasional hiring; Interview credits are metered monthly, so high-volume hiring seasons can push you into an upgrade; Advanced features such as custom branding and multiple ATS integrations are gated behind the Growth tier; AI scoring is consistent but still benefits from a human review pass for senior or highly specialized roles

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/screenify.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Notta and Screenify compare in monthly traffic?

Notta has 2,585,354 monthly visits, while Screenify has 4,326. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Notta has a month-over-month growth rate of +2%; Screenify has -17.1%.

### How does pricing compare?

Notta: Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Free plan with 120 transcription minutes per month and full transcription features. Paid Pro plans start around $8.17 per month when billed annually, with higher tiers and enterprise options; a contact-based plan is available for organizations. Screenify: Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Screenify uses volume-based pricing with a 7-day free trial on paid plans: Starter at $149/month covers 1 job role and up to 100 interviews per month, Growth at $629/month covers up to 5 job roles, 500 interviews, up to 3 integrations, and custom branding, and larger requirements are quoted custom. Credits are only charged for interviews that candidates start and join.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [TurboScribe](https://openaitools.app/tool/turboscribe-ai) | 27,661,771 | +2.1% | Freemium | Unlimited AI transcription of audio and video in 98+ languages | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/turboscribe-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Otter AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/otter-ai) | 7,360,981 | +9.6% | Freemium | A pioneer in automated meeting notes with strong live transcription, but less robust multilingual slide export options. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/otter-ai.md) |
| 3 | [Fathom](https://openaitools.app/tool/fathom-2-0) | 5,620,385 | +0.2% | Freemium, Free Trial | Provides free unlimited video call recording and summarization, but lacks Notta's dedicated audio file translation features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/fathom-2-0.md) |
| 4 | [Fireflies.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/fireflies-ai) | 4,411,502 | +3% | Freemium | Offers powerful enterprise meeting search and analytics, but has a more complex pricing and setup structure. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/fireflies-ai.md) |
| 5 | [Happy Scribe](https://openaitools.app/tool/happyscribe-com) | 4,088,330 | +8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid | AI transcription and meeting notes in 150+ languages | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/happyscribe-com.md) |
| 6 | [UniScribe](https://openaitools.app/tool/uniscribe) | 1,486,239 | +0.7% | Freemium | Turn audio and video into accurate, searchable text in minutes | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/uniscribe.md) |
| 7 | [Transkriptor](https://openaitools.app/tool/transkriptor-com) | 628,671 | -3.6% | Free Trial, Paid | Focuses heavily on accurate audio-to-text conversion and translation across files, with straightforward note summaries. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/transkriptor-com.md) |
| 8 | [Bluedot](https://openaitools.app/tool/bluedot) | 546,739 | -5.4% | Freemium | Offers bot-free meeting recording via browser extensions, avoiding awkward calendar bots in customer calls. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/bluedot.md) |
| 9 | [Noota](https://openaitools.app/tool/noota) | 283,526 | +3.3% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Combines meeting transcription with voice dictation and automated follow-up emails, though with smaller user adoption. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/noota.md) |
| 10 | [Metaview](https://openaitools.app/tool/metaview) | 259,340 | +54.3% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Agentic recruiting platform for sourcing, screening, and interviews | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/metaview.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/notta-vs-screenify

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)