# Pie vs QA.tech

Pie records 11,551 monthly visits with +21.8% month-over-month growth and Contact for Pricing pricing. QA.tech records 30,550 monthly visits with -4.4% growth and Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Pie](https://openaitools.app/tool/pie) | [QA.tech](https://openaitools.app/tool/qa-tech) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://pie.inc | https://qa.tech |
| Categories | AI Testing, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, No-Code&Low-Code | AI Testing, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, AI Productivity Tools |
| Pricing Model | Contact for Pricing | Paid, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 11,551 | 30,550 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +21.8% | -4.4% |
| Primary Market | United States | Sweden |
| Direct Visits | 5,132 | 21,231 |
| Review Score | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Pie

Pie approaches software quality from a different angle than script-based automation. Instead of maintaining selectors and assertions, it explores your product the way a person would: it maps real user flows, looks at the screen to find elements, and exercises each change the way a customer would. Because it relies on vision rather than selectors, coverage keeps working when the interface is redesigned, and self-healing tests are the norm rather than the exception.

The platform hooks into your development workflow. It reads pull requests, runs the affected journeys before release, and reports functional and usability problems that a passing status code would hide, such as a cart badge showing one item while the cart is actually empty. When it finds a confirmed issue, Pie drafts a fix pull request with the root cause explained, so engineers review a solution instead of a bug report. Only findings that are reproduced reach you, which keeps the signal high and the noise low.

Pie runs on the surfaces where your customers actually are: iOS, Android, web, and cross-platform stacks such as React Native, Flutter and webviews. It integrates with GitHub, Slack, Jira and MCP, supports plain-English test authoring, and is built for security-conscious teams with SOC 2 Type 2 compliance and scoped access. Instead of replacing engineers, it takes the maintenance burden off manual QA so releases can move faster with more confidence.

**Pricing & Plans:** Custom pricing; the vendor asks you to book a demo for a quote. There is no published self-serve plan.

- **Vision-first autonomous discovery:** Pie maps your real user flows from a URL or build and finds elements by looking at the screen, so there are no selectors to maintain.
- **Tests every pull request:** Each PR is read and exercised against the running app, so regressions are caught before they reach users.
- **Self-healing coverage:** Tests survive redesigns and deep links because they rely on how the interface looks and behaves, not on brittle CSS or accessibility paths.
- **Automatic fix pull requests:** When Pie confirms a bug, it drafts a fix PR with the root cause and the applied change, ready for review and merge.
- **Runs across iOS, Android and web:** Coverage spans native mobile, browsers and popular cross-platform frameworks, with integrations for GitHub, Slack, Jira and MCP.

**Strengths:** No test scripts or selectors to write or maintain; Finds functional and usability bugs that assertion-based tests pass; Drafts fix pull requests instead of only filing bug reports; Covers iOS, Android and web, including cross-platform frameworks

**Limitations:** No public self-serve pricing; sales conversation required; Enterprise-oriented, so it may be heavy for very small teams; Best results depend on granting repository and app access

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/pie.md)

## QA.tech

QA.tech positions itself as the verification layer for teams shipping software with heavy AI assistance: coding got much faster, but review and QA did not keep pace. Instead of maintaining a fragile library of selectors and scripts, QA.tech runs autonomous agents that open your live web or native mobile app, work toward goals the way a person would, and report back on what actually works before code is merged.,The product is built around continuous, dynamic testing rather than one-off suites. Connect GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket and a CI provider, and agents automatically pick up each pull request together with its preview environment, run end-to-end and exploratory passes, and comment on the PR with results. When something fails, you get screenshots, console and network activity and the agent's reasoning at the point of failure, which shortens time to root cause considerably.,Testing is also context-aware over time. Journeys and domain rules you spell out in chat accumulate as knowledge the agents reuse on every later run, and a blast-radius view flags changes that ship untested because a required test user or journey is missing. The platform is cloud-native, needs no code access, and is targeted at QA leads, engineers, CTOs and DevOps teams; Vercel Ventures and founder investors back the company. Pricing is not published as a simple self-serve number — teams book a demo, though a free getting-started path is offered.

**Pricing & Plans:** Enterprise-style, contact-for-pricing model: the site offers a free getting-started path and a demo booking rather than public per-seat numbers, so exact costs depend on team size, coverage scope and mobile testing needs.

- **Plain-language test authoring:** Describe a journey or rule in chat and the agent turns it into durable test cases that survive refactors and redesigns.
- **PR-level verification:** Every pull request gets a dynamic exploratory pass with preview environments, failure breakdowns, screenshots, console and network logs.
- **Web and native mobile:** Agents target real browsers and native iOS and Android apps, so coverage reaches beyond the web front end.
- **CI, Git and issue-tracker integrations:** Findings flow into Jira and Linear, and agents can be queried over MCP by other coding agents.
- **Blast-radius analysis:** Detects when changes to a module are untested and recommends the exact journeys or test users needed to close the gap.

**Strengths:** Agents test visually without selectors, so suites survive redesigns and framework migrations; Runs automatically on every pull request with preview environments; Plain-English test authoring is accessible to non-engineers; Rich failure evidence — screenshots, logs, network data and agent reasoning

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/qa-tech.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Pie and QA.tech compare in monthly traffic?

Pie has 11,551 monthly visits, while QA.tech has 30,550. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Pie has a month-over-month growth rate of +21.8%; QA.tech has -4.4%.

### How does pricing compare?

Pie: Contact for Pricing. Custom pricing; the vendor asks you to book a demo for a quote. There is no published self-serve plan. QA.tech: Paid, Contact for Pricing. Enterprise-style, contact-for-pricing model: the site offers a free getting-started path and a demo booking rather than public per-seat numbers, so exact costs depend on team size, coverage scope and mobile testing needs.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Cognition's autonomous software engineer that ships real pull requests | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 2 | [KaneAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai) | 901,340 | +13.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | GenAI-native end-to-end QA agent that plans, writes and heals tests in plain language | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai.md) |
| 3 | [Qase](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase) | 319,213 | -25.5% | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Ship with confidence: one system of record for manual, automated, and CI tests | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase.md) |
| 4 | [ProjectDiscovery Neo](https://openaitools.app/tool/projectdiscovery-neo) | 158,530 | +22.5% | Paid, Contact for Pricing | AI security platform that finds exposures, proves they're exploitable, and ships the fix | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/projectdiscovery-neo.md) |
| 5 | [Katalon](https://openaitools.app/tool/katalon-studio) | 158,090 | -29.6% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | AI-augmented quality platform for web, mobile, API and desktop testing | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/katalon-studio.md) |
| 6 | [TestSprite](https://openaitools.app/tool/testsprite) | 114,205 | +15.8% | Freemium | Agentic end-to-end testing that writes, runs and heals your test suite | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/testsprite.md) |
| 7 | [testRigor](https://openaitools.app/tool/testrigor-com) | 105,865 | -2.7% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Write end-to-end test automation in plain English, no code required | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/testrigor-com.md) |
| 8 | [Momentic](https://openaitools.app/tool/momentic) | 68,819 | -15.2% | Freemium, Usage-based, Enterprise | Agentic AI QA engineer for web, iOS, and Android testing | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/momentic.md) |
| 9 | [Autify](https://openaitools.app/tool/autify-com) | 60,130 | +6% | Contact for Pricing | AI testing platform for the entire software testing lifecycle | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/autify-com.md) |
| 10 | [Virtuoso QA](https://openaitools.app/tool/virtuoso-qa) | 20,169 | +84.5% | Paid, Contact for Pricing | Agentic test automation that builds, runs and maintains your enterprise tests | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/virtuoso-qa.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/pie-vs-qa-tech

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)