# PulpMiner vs TinyFish

PulpMiner records 1,756 monthly visits with -9.2% month-over-month growth and Paid pricing. TinyFish records 1,124,952 monthly visits with +199.7% growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [PulpMiner](https://openaitools.app/tool/pulpminer) | [TinyFish](https://openaitools.app/tool/tinyfish) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.pulpminer.com | https://www.tinyfish.ai |
| Categories | AI API, AI Web Scraping, No-Code&Low-Code | AI API, AI Agent, AI Browsers, AI Web Scraping |
| Pricing Model | Paid | Freemium, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 1,756 | 1,124,952 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -9.2% | +199.7% |
| Primary Market | Global | United States |
| Direct Visits | 684 | 401,320 |
| Review Score | 4.1 | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## PulpMiner

PulpMiner solves a small but constant problem: you need data that only exists on a webpage. Instead of writing and maintaining a scraper, you paste the URL into PulpMiner, and it reads the page structure and proposes a clean JSON object. You adjust the fields you care about — title, price, author, rating, stock status, whatever the page exposes — and save it. From then on it is a working endpoint returning live, structured data on every request, callable with a plain GET and an API key.

The workflow is deliberately three-step: enter a URL, get a JSON shape, call your live API. Because extraction is AI-driven rather than selector-driven, it survives the layout changes that normally break scrapers, and because rendering happens server-side, JavaScript-heavy single-page applications work too. Part of a URL can be made dynamic, so one endpoint can serve a whole category of pages, and optional caching speeds up frequently-hit endpoints while reducing credit consumption.

The integration story is where PulpMiner differentiates itself from raw scraping APIs. There is a Google Sheets add-on that turns a column of URLs into structured data with no API key or formulas; an n8n community node; a native Zapier app; and a hosted MCP server that lets AI assistants such as Claude and Cursor turn pages into JSON and call your saved APIs directly. Pricing is credit-based rather than subscription-based — credits never expire — starting from a free tier, with published packages and an enterprise tier with SLA and custom scrapers.

**Pricing & Plans:** Credit-based, no subscription, and credits never expire. Free tier: 5 credits (about 10 API requests), no card required. Paid packages: $15 for 300 credits (~600 requests) and $55 for 1,100 credits (~2,200 requests), plus a custom amount option from 300 to 10,500 credits. Enterprise pricing with SLA guarantees, priority support, custom packages and enhanced scrapers is available on request.

- **URL to live JSON API:** Paste any public URL and PulpMiner proposes a structured JSON shape you can adjust, then saves it as a persistent API endpoint returning fresh data on every call.
- **AI extraction with no selector code:** The extractor reads page structure and pulls exactly the fields you asked for — price, title, author, stock status and so on — as clean JSON without writing selectors.
- **Dynamic URL variables and caching:** Make parts of the URL dynamic so one endpoint serves many pages through parameters, and turn on optional caching for pages you hit often to save credits.
- **JavaScript rendering:** Renders JavaScript, so single-page apps and dynamically loaded content are supported alongside plain HTML pages.
- **Integrations and secure keys:** Google Sheets add-on, n8n community node, native Zapier app and a hosted MCP server for Claude, Cursor and other AI assistants — with API keys securing every endpoint.

**Strengths:** Turns a URL into a working API in three steps without writing or maintaining scraper code; AI-driven extraction is resilient to the layout changes that break CSS-selector scrapers; Credits are a one-time purchase and never expire — no forced monthly subscription; Strong automation integrations: Google Sheets add-on, n8n node, Zapier app and an MCP server for AI assistants

**Limitations:** Credits are prepaid, so heavy or unpredictable scraping volumes need advance budgeting; If a target page's structure changes significantly, endpoints may need to be re-shaped; Very high-frequency polling still consumes credits even though each call returns live data; Enterprise pricing is a sales conversation rather than a published number

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/pulpminer.md)

## TinyFish

TinyFish describes itself as the web stack for AI agents: a serverless platform that lets agents search, extract, browse and act on the live web. Rather than a single point tool, it groups several products under one API key and one wallet — TinySearch for fresh, browser-rendered web search returned as structured JSON, TinyFetch for turning any URL into clean Markdown, JSON or HTML, TinyBrowser for real cloud browser sessions driven with Playwright, Puppeteer or CDP, TinyAgent for plain-English multi-step automation, and TinyMonitor for alerts when a page or topic changes.

The platform is aimed at production workloads rather than demos. It emphasises reliability and structure, real browser rendering instead of thin cached results, persistent session state, and the ability to handle authenticated flows. Supporting pieces include TinyVault for connecting 1Password or Bitwarden so credentials stay hidden from the model, TinyProfiles for saving signed-in sessions, and step-by-step run recordings so you can audit exactly what an agent did on a site.

TinyFish is designed to slot into existing developer stacks. It is promoted for use alongside Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and other agent runtimes, offers an MCP connection, Python SDK and CLI, and is positioned for workloads such as price monitoring, record enrichment, deep research and supplier-portal automation. Entry-level search and fetch calls are free, while agent steps, browser minutes and monitoring checks are metered on a pay-as-you-go wallet basis, with an enterprise track for larger deployments.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium and usage-based. Search and basic fetch are free with no search fee, while TinyAgent is billed per step, TinyBrowser per minute and TinyMonitor per check from a prepaid wallet; new users can claim a small free credit. Enterprise plans are custom — confirm current rates on the pricing page.

- **TinySearch:** Real browser-rendered search that returns structured JSON with fresh, uncached results from the live web, with no search fee.
- **TinyFetch:** Convert any URL into token-efficient Markdown, JSON or HTML, stripping navigation bars, cookie banners and ads before they reach your model.
- **TinyBrowser:** Full cloud browser sessions with persistent state that you drive with Playwright, Puppeteer or the Chrome DevTools Protocol.
- **TinyAgent and TinyMonitor:** Give an agent a goal in plain English and it navigates, fills forms and returns structured results; monitoring fires alerts when a tracked page or topic changes.
- **One API key, one wallet:** Search, fetch, browser and agent products share single authentication and billing, plus an MCP connection, Python SDK and CLI.

**Strengths:** Consolidates search, fetch, browsing, agent automation and monitoring behind one API key and wallet; Browser-rendered, uncached results rather than thin cached snippets; Free search and fetch tiers lower the cost per task compared to several paid search APIs; Strong developer ergonomics: MCP, Python SDK, CLI and integrations with popular agent runtimes

**Limitations:** Agent steps, browser minutes and monitoring checks are metered, so heavy automation volumes add up; More complex auth flows still carry the usual fragility of driving third-party sites; It is infrastructure for builders — not aimed at non-technical end users

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/tinyfish.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do PulpMiner and TinyFish compare in monthly traffic?

PulpMiner has 1,756 monthly visits, while TinyFish has 1,124,952. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

PulpMiner has a month-over-month growth rate of -9.2%; TinyFish has +199.7%.

### How does pricing compare?

PulpMiner: Paid. Credit-based, no subscription, and credits never expire. Free tier: 5 credits (about 10 API requests), no card required. Paid packages: $15 for 300 credits (~600 requests) and $55 for 1,100 credits (~2,200 requests), plus a custom amount option from 300 to 10,500 credits. Enterprise pricing with SLA guarantees, priority support, custom packages and enhanced scrapers is available on request. TinyFish: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Freemium and usage-based. Search and basic fetch are free with no search fee, while TinyAgent is billed per step, TinyBrowser per minute and TinyMonitor per check from a prepaid wallet; new users can claim a small free credit. Enterprise plans are custom — confirm current rates on the pricing page.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Apify](https://openaitools.app/tool/apify) | 4,147,762 | +3.9% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Features a massive marketplace of ready-to-run scrapers, though it operates more as an actor platform than a raw API. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/apify.md) |
| 2 | [Firecrawl](https://openaitools.app/tool/firecrawl-dev) | 1,828,239 | -1.9% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Provides cleaner LLM-ready markdown conversion and crawling, but lacks TinyFish's interactive cloud browser automation capabilities. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/firecrawl-dev.md) |
| 3 | [Exa](https://openaitools.app/tool/exa-ai) | 1,062,574 | +16.8% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Offers superior neural web search designed for AI agents, but provides less comprehensive raw browser automation tools. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/exa-ai.md) |
| 4 | [Bright Data](https://openaitools.app/tool/bright-data) | 802,752 | -5.9% | Free Trial, Paid | Delivers enterprise-grade proxy networks and scraping infrastructure, but involves a steeper learning curve than TinyFish. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/bright-data.md) |
| 5 | [Jina AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/jina-ai) | 280,782 | -16.5% | Freemium, Paid | Excels at converting URLs into clean markdown and embeddings, but lacks dedicated browser actuation and live search endpoints. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jina-ai.md) |
| 6 | [Browserless](https://openaitools.app/tool/browserless) | 185,543 | -21.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Gives you robust headless browser automation and control, but requires more custom development than managed agent APIs. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/browserless.md) |
| 7 | [Thor Data](https://openaitools.app/tool/thor-data) | 181,966 | -3.5% | Free Trial, Paid | Proxies and web data APIs for scraping and AI pipelines | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/thor-data.md) |
| 8 | [Yep.com](https://openaitools.app/tool/yep-com) | 155,834 | +6.2% | Free | Provides independent web search and agent grounding, but lacks content fetching and browser automation features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/yep-com.md) |
| 9 | [ScrapeGraphAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/scrapegraphai) | 91,362 | -25.7% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Uses natural language prompts for open-source web scraping, but offers fewer managed enterprise cloud browser features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scrapegraphai.md) |
| 10 | [Scrapingdog](https://openaitools.app/tool/scrapingdog) | 89,683 | -15% | Free Trial, Paid | Provides reliable proxy and web scraping endpoints for data extraction, but lacks advanced agentic cloud browser workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scrapingdog.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/pulpminer-vs-tinyfish

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)
