# Rivet.dev vs Together AI

Rivet.dev records 21,359 monthly visits with -44.3% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing. Together AI records 1,645,930 monthly visits with +64.9% growth and Freemium, Paid pricing.

| Metric | [Rivet.dev](https://openaitools.app/tool/rivet-dev) | [Together AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/together-ai) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://rivet.dev | https://www.together.ai |
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Workflow, AI Developer Tools, AI App Builder | AI Developer Tools, AI API, AI Models, Open Source AI Models |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Freemium, Paid |
| Monthly Visits | 21,359 | 1,645,930 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -44.3% | +64.9% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 10,710 | 882,212 |
| Review Score | 4.5 | 4.7 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Rivet.dev

At its core Rivet replaces the container per agent with an in-process primitive. An Actor runs inside your existing Node.js or Bun backend rather than in its own container or VM, which is why Rivet reports cold starts measured in single-digit milliseconds and a footprint of tens of kilobytes per Actor instead of hundreds of megabytes. Each Actor carries a SQLite database for memory, can access a filesystem and shell, sleeps when idle, and wakes with its durable state ready for the next request.

The platform handles the operational pieces teams usually build themselves: fault tolerance that reschedules Actors when a node goes down, multi-region placement that routes requests to wherever an Actor currently lives, end-to-end type safety where Actor definitions generate client types, and scheduling via cron or self-set timestamps. Storage is pulled apart into two tiers — a fast SSD for instant writes and object storage that settles writes at a fraction of the cost — so running many small databases stays affordable.

Rivet positions itself as infrastructure for the "agentic era" and can be deployed as a managed cloud, inside your own VPC through a bring-your-own-cloud model, or fully self-hosted down to air-gapped networks. It is open source under Apache 2.0, backed by Y Combinator and a16z Speedrun, and integrates with popular coding agents and frameworks.

**Pricing & Plans:** Rivet Cloud uses a plan-plus-nodes model. The control plane is Free ($0) for prototyping, Hobby at $10/month, Team at $120/month, and Enterprise at $900/month, each raising control-plane redundancy, Actor Node caps, and support. Actor Nodes are billed per month on top, from $4.20 (R-5) to $94.50 (R-160). Self-hosting is free and open source under Apache 2.0, and startups from Y Combinator or a16z Speedrun get 50% off the Team plan for 12 months.

- **Durable actors with persistent state:** Every Actor gets a SQLite database and a filesystem, so an agent's memory and progress survive restarts and idle periods without a separate database.
- **Lightweight secure sandboxing:** Run untrusted or AI-generated code on your own infrastructure with fine-grained control over network access, filesystem permissions, and resource limits.
- **Fault tolerance and workflows:** A node failure reschedules its Actors elsewhere with state intact, and multi-step work replays after a crash — with no checkpointing harness to build yourself.
- **Realtime and multiplayer:** Address an Actor directly over HTTP or hold a live WebSocket, and use the React SDK to subscribe components to an Actor's state in real time.
- **One-binary deployment and observability:** Ship with a single stateless Rust binary, embeds storage in S3-compatible buckets, and emits OpenTelemetry traces, metrics, and logs to your existing collector.

**Strengths:** Four-digit millisecond cold starts and a very small per-Actor memory footprint let a single server host far more agents; Open source (Apache 2.0) with a single Rust binary, so it can be self-hosted, run in a VPC, or air-gapped; Durable state via per-Actor SQLite plus object-storage-backed tiers keeps agents restart-safe and cheap; Strong developer ergonomics: typed SDKs, a React SDK, WebSocket networking, and OpenTelemetry baked in

**Limitations:** Requires Node.js or Bun and a working Rust-based control plane deployment for self-hosting, so it favors backend engineers over no-code users; Advanced durability and sandboxing concepts (Actors, WarpDrive storage) carry a learning curve; Managed cloud cost scales with Actor Nodes, which can climb for many mid-sized/sized nodes; Enterprise features like multi-tenancy and hardened compliance guidance sit behind sales conversations

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/rivet-dev.md)

## Together AI

Together AI is the AI Native Cloud — a full-stack platform for running, fine-tuning and training open-source models. It spans serverless inference APIs, dedicated endpoints, GPU clusters, post-training and storage, all backed by in-house systems research. Together AI is the AI Native Cloud — a full-stack platform for running, fine-tuning and training open-source models. It spans serverless inference APIs, dedicated endpoints, GPU clusters, post-training and storage, all backed by in-house systems research.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium, Paid

**Limitations:** Serverless pricing varies widely by model, so cost forecasting takes care; Heavy GPU-cluster and high-throughput workloads still require sales contact; Broad surface area (inference, GPU, fine-tuning, sandboxes, storage) can feel complex for beginners; Some newest models are marked experimental or preview and may change

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/together-ai.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Rivet.dev and Together AI compare in monthly traffic?

Rivet.dev has 21,359 monthly visits, while Together AI has 1,645,930. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Rivet.dev has a month-over-month growth rate of -44.3%; Together AI has +64.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Rivet.dev: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Rivet Cloud uses a plan-plus-nodes model. The control plane is Free ($0) for prototyping, Hobby at $10/month, Team at $120/month, and Enterprise at $900/month, each raising control-plane redundancy, Actor Node caps, and support. Actor Nodes are billed per month on top, from $4.20 (R-5) to $94.50 (R-160). Self-hosting is free and open source under Apache 2.0, and startups from Y Combinator or a16z Speedrun get 50% off the Team plan for 12 months. Together AI: Freemium, Paid. Freemium, Paid

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [OpenAI Platform](https://openaitools.app/tool/openai) | 234,678,639 | -9.6% | Paid | Provides industry-leading proprietary frontier models and enterprise reliability, but completely lacks support for open-weight community models. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/openai.md) |
| 2 | [Google AI Studio](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-ai-studio) | 112,620,020 | +2% | Freemium | Restricts API usage strictly to Gemini models, offering free prototyping tiers but lacking open-source model variety. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-ai-studio.md) |
| 3 | [OpenRouter](https://openaitools.app/tool/openrouter-ai) | 19,941,437 | -6.2% | Paid | Aggregates hundreds of models through a single API, offering broader model choice than Together AI's hosted lineup. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/openrouter-ai.md) |
| 4 | [Groq](https://openaitools.app/tool/groq) | 3,987,936 | +10% | Paid | Delivers dramatically faster token generation speeds using custom hardware, though with a more limited model selection. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/groq.md) |
| 5 | [fal.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/fal-ai) | 3,093,684 | -3.7% | Paid, pay-as-you-go usage-based pricing | One API for 1,500+ production-ready generative media models | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/fal-ai.md) |
| 6 | [Replicate AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/replicate-ai) | 904,038 | -8.4% | Paid | Focuses heavily on deploying custom machine learning models and media generation pipelines alongside standard text LLMs. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replicate-ai.md) |
| 7 | [Unsloth AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/unsloth-ai) | 887,457 | -17.6% | Free | Open-source, memory-efficient fine-tuning and local model running | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/unsloth-ai.md) |
| 8 | [Fireworks](https://openaitools.app/tool/fireworks-ai) | 659,687 | +6% | Contact for Pricing | Provides exceptionally fast inference speeds and robust fine-tuning tools, competing directly on open-source model deployment performance. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/fireworks-ai.md) |
| 9 | [DeepInfra](https://openaitools.app/tool/deep-infra) | 457,810 | -8.9% | Paid | Offers similar low-cost serverless inference for open-weight models, but with a simpler pay-as-you-go pricing model. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/deep-infra.md) |
| 10 | [Mastra](https://openaitools.app/tool/mastra) | 318,954 | -5% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The TypeScript framework for building, deploying, and observing AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mastra.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/rivet-dev-vs-together-ai

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)