# ScienHub vs Underleaf

ScienHub records 174 monthly visits with -97.8% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Underleaf records 222,941 monthly visits with -1.9% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [ScienHub](https://openaitools.app/tool/scienhub) | [Underleaf](https://openaitools.app/tool/underleaf) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://scienhub.com | https://underleaf.ai |
| Categories | AI Writing Assistants, AI Grammar Checker, AI Rewriter, Large Language Models (LLMs) | AI Writing, AI OCR, AI Thesis Generator, AI PDF |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 174 | 222,941 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -97.8% | -1.9% |
| Primary Market | India | United States |
| Direct Visits | 67 | 26,916 |
| Review Score | 4.2 | 4.5 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## ScienHub

ScienHub targets the specific friction of writing in LaTeX: a local toolchain to install, version control to keep straight, and co-authors to coordinate with. It runs entirely in the browser, so there is no LaTeX distribution to configure, and real-time compilation shows the typeset result as you work rather than after a slow build. The site positions it directly as a free alternative to established online LaTeX editors such as Overleaf, and ScienHub is an independent product that is not affiliated with or endorsed by Overleaf.

The collaboration model is the main selling point. Multiple users edit the same document simultaneously and see changes live, which turns the usual email-a-.tex-file workflow into something closer to working in a shared document. Git version control is built in, so revision history is tracked properly instead of through filenames like final_v3_really_final.tex. Templates are provided for common paper structures, and starter QR codes for community groups suggest the team is building a user community around the tool.

On pricing, ScienHub currently states that all features are free, with no subscription and no credit card required. That is a strong offer for students, small research groups and anyone who wants collaborative LaTeX without a paid seat. Because the wording is framed as a present arrangement rather than a permanent commitment, it is worth confirming current terms on the site before building a long-lived workflow around it.

**Pricing & Plans:** ScienHub states that all features are free for now, with no subscription and no credit card required. The site includes a pricing page, so check it for the current position before relying on free access long term.

- **Real-time collaboration:** Multiple authors edit the same document at once and see each other's changes immediately, which suits research teams and supervisors.
- **Fast in-browser compilation:** Compile in the browser without installing a local LaTeX distribution and preview your typeset output as you write.
- **Git version control:** Track revisions and sync your source properly using Git version control instead of renaming files by hand.
- **Templates for papers:** Start from LaTeX templates instead of a blank document, useful for standard paper and report structures.
- **No installation required:** Everything runs on the web with no setup, so you can write from any machine without configuring a toolchain.

**Strengths:** Real-time collaborative editing removes the file-emailing workflow; Compiles in the browser with no local LaTeX installation; Built-in Git version control for proper revision tracking; Currently free with no credit card required

**Limitations:** Advanced features are stated as free 'for now', so future pricing is not guaranteed; Fewer surrounding scholarly services than the most established LaTeX suites; Community groups were still marked coming soon at the time of review; Smaller ecosystem means fewer third-party templates than larger platforms

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/scienhub.md)

## Underleaf

Underleaf focuses on the gap between what researchers already have — scanned notes, photos of a whiteboard, a journal PDF, a spreadsheet of results — and the LaTeX source they need. You upload the source material, pick the pages you care about when it is a multi-page document, and the tool returns one structured LaTeX document with sections, numbered equations, tables, and figures placed where they belong. It claims 98%+ accuracy on equations, including matrices, integrals, and aligned multi-line derivations, and shows a typeset preview before you download anything.

Beyond conversion, Underleaf bundles the writing work that usually happens afterwards: drafting abstracts and summaries, generating thesis statements, rewriting paragraphs for clarity while keeping your terminology, and looking up citations with BibTeX output. A browser extension brings the same rewriting, shortening, and explaining actions next to whatever draft you already have open, so you do not have to copy text into a separate tab.

The site reports 50,000+ academic users across 200+ universities and 240,000+ documents converted. A large set of single-purpose free tools (image to LaTeX, PDF to LaTeX, Excel to LaTeX, TikZ generator, table generator, citation generator, and more) can be used without an account, which makes it easy to test quality before paying.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. New users get 10 free credits with no credit card required, and many single-purpose converters and generators run free in the browser. Paid plans: Essentials at $12/month ($6/month billed annually, $72/year) with 200 credits per month and up to 10 pages per PDF; Pro at $24/month ($12/month billed annually, $144/year) with 500 credits per month, all LaTeX tools, and up to 20 pages per PDF. Both include the browser extension. A Team plan for groups of 5+ adds centralized billing, an admin dashboard, and reimbursable invoices.

- **Anything-to-LaTeX conversion:** Converts handwritten notes, photos and screenshots, scanned papers, Word documents, tables, and spreadsheets into LaTeX code that compiles rather than a rough approximation you must retype.
- **Whole-document PDF handling:** Uploads multi-page PDFs and lets you choose which pages to convert, returning one structured document with sections, numbered equations, tables, and figures in the right places.
- **Math and diagram recognition:** Reads equations, matrices, integrals, and aligned derivations at a stated 98%+ accuracy, and can turn diagrams and plots into TikZ.
- **Academic writing tools:** Drafts abstracts, summaries, and thesis statements; rewrites for clarity without losing your meaning; and looks up citations with BibTeX in the same place.
- **Browser extension and free tool library:** A browser extension adds rewrite, shorten, and explain actions beside your draft, while 60+ free single-purpose converters and generators run without an account.

**Strengths:** Handles many input types — handwriting, images, PDFs, Word, and spreadsheets — through one workflow; Produces structured, compilable LaTeX rather than plain-text approximations; Multi-page PDFs come back as a single document with sections, equations, and figures placed correctly; Free tier and 60+ no-account browser tools make quality easy to test before paying

**Limitations:** Credit-based limits mean heavy conversion work can require a paid tier quickly; Math accuracy is high but stated at 98%+, so output still needs a review pass; Team and institutional billing details are only available on request; Best experience depends on using the browser extension alongside your LaTeX editor

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/underleaf.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do ScienHub and Underleaf compare in monthly traffic?

ScienHub has 174 monthly visits, while Underleaf has 222,941. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

ScienHub has a month-over-month growth rate of -97.8%; Underleaf has -1.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

ScienHub: Freemium. ScienHub states that all features are free for now, with no subscription and no credit card required. The site includes a pricing page, so check it for the current position before relying on free access long term. Underleaf: Freemium. Freemium. New users get 10 free credits with no credit card required, and many single-purpose converters and generators run free in the browser. Paid plans: Essentials at $12/month ($6/month billed annually, $72/year) with 200 credits per month and up to 10 pages per PDF; Pro at $24/month ($12/month billed annually, $144/year) with 500 credits per month, all LaTeX tools, and up to 20 pages per PDF. Both include the browser extension. A Team plan for groups of 5+ adds centralized billing, an admin dashboard, and reimbursable invoices.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [ChatGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4) | 6,048,022,723 | +2.2% | Freemium | OpenAI's flagship multimodal assistant powered by GPT-6 and GPT-5.6 for reasoning, coding, and deep research. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4.md) |
| 2 | [DeepSeek](https://openaitools.app/tool/deepseek) | 372,761,591 | +4.3% | Freemium | High-efficiency open-weight and hosted reasoning AI powered by DeepSeek-V4 and R1 at ultra-low token costs. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/deepseek.md) |
| 3 | [QuillBot Paraphraser](https://openaitools.app/tool/quillbot-paraphraser) | 36,630,337 | +2.3% | Freemium | Paraphrase, proofread and summarize text with an AI writing workspace | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/quillbot-paraphraser.md) |
| 4 | [Scribbr](https://openaitools.app/tool/scribbr) | 7,530,803 | +14.6% | Freemium | Academic proofreading, plagiarism checking and AI-powered writing tools in one place | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scribbr.md) |
| 5 | [PDFgear](https://openaitools.app/tool/pdfgear) | 2,845,280 | -3.4% | Free | A free, AI-powered PDF editor for every device | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/pdfgear.md) |
| 6 | [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | +5.2% | Freemium | The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni.md) |
| 7 | [Hemingway Editor](https://openaitools.app/tool/hemingway-editor) | 605,169 | -8.6% | Free Trial, Paid, Free | Write bolder, clearer prose with instant readability and grammar feedback | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/hemingway-editor.md) |
| 8 | [Mathpix](https://openaitools.app/tool/mathpix) | 257,060 | -6.9% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Industry standard for converting scientific formulas and PDFs into LaTeX, but lacks Underleaf's dedicated writing workspace. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mathpix.md) |
| 9 | [Trinka AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/trinka-ai-grammar-checker-tool) | 246,624 | -2.3% | Freemium | Provides technical grammar checking for academic writing without offering LaTeX OCR or compilation features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/trinka-ai-grammar-checker-tool.md) |
| 10 | [ThesisAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/thesisai) | 224,434 | +18.3% | Paid | Specializes in turning reference papers into cited academic drafts rather than converting notes to raw LaTeX. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/thesisai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/scienhub-vs-underleaf

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)