# Penelope

Selon la télémétrie OpenAITools.app vérifiée le 2026-11-11, Penelope (penelope.ai) est une plateforme d'IA indexée sous Vérificateur par IA générant 3,01 k visites mensuelles avec un delta de trafic mensuel de -5,09 k (-62,8 %). Son marché géographique principal est Global (— de part de trafic), et elle fonctionne selon un modèle tarifaire Payant, Tarifs sur demande. Les principales alternatives concurrentes par volume mensuel incluent Trinka AI (246,62 k visites/mois), Thesify (116,87 k visites/mois), Jenni (1,5 M visites/mois).

Penelope.ai automates pre-submission manuscript checking for academic journals. It inspects a submission against that journal's own author guidelines — ethics, declarations, abstract structure, figures and tables, referencing style, word counts and file cleanliness — and returns an annotated report linking every result back to the exact passage that triggered it. Editors cut triage time; authors find out what is missing before they submit.

## Télémétrie et spécifications clés

| Métrique | Valeur |
| :--- | :--- |
| Nom de l'outil | Penelope |
| Identifiant | penelope-ai |
| Status | active |
| Origin | independent |
| Maintenance | active |
| Domaine officiel | penelope.ai |
| URL du site web | https://penelope.ai |
| Catégories | Vérificateur par IA, Relecture IA, Outils IA pour articles de recherche, AI Writing Assistants, Outil de recherche IA, Extraction de documents IA |
| Modèle tarifaire | Payant, Tarifs sur demande |
| Visites mensuelles | 3 010 |
| Variation du trafic mensuel | -5 086 |
| Taux de croissance mensuel | -62,8 % |
| Marché principal | Global |
| Part de marché | — |
| Visites directes | 1 216 |
| Visites de recherche organique | — |
| Visites sociales | — |
| Visites par référencement | 319 |
| Visites par e-mail | 103 |
| Score d'avis | 4,2 |
| Nombre d'enregistrements | 0 |
| Plateformes prises en charge | Site web |
| Plateformes de facturation |  |
| Attributs | Fonctionnalités: Site web; Tarification: Payant; Tarification: Tarifs sur demande |
| Étiquettes | Contrôle des manuscrits, Exigences des revues, Vérifications automatiques, Édition scientifique, Outils éditoriaux, Préparation des manuscrits, Vérification des références, Conformité éthique, Partage des données, Contributions des auteurs, Comptage de mots, Résumé, Figures et tableaux, Style de référencement, Propreté du fichier, Métadonnées |

## Aperçu

Penelope.ai automates pre-submission manuscript checking for academic journals. It inspects a submission against that journal's own author guidelines — ethics, declarations, abstract structure, figures and tables, referencing style, word counts and file cleanliness — and returns an annotated report linking every result back to the exact passage that triggered it. Editors cut triage time; authors find out what is missing before they submit.

## Tarifs et offres

Priced per journal by annual submission volume (excl. VAT), and every tier includes the full check suite plus metadata extraction. Indicative rates: around £1.50 per submission below 500 annual submissions, £1.20 for 501–1,000, £1.00 for 1,001–2,500, and £0.80 for 2,501–5,000 and above; annual packages are quoted as roughly £750, £1,350 and £2,850 in the lower bands, with higher volumes quoted directly. Publishers can alternatively let authors pay for checks themselves at no cost to the journal.

## Fonctionnalités clés et capacités

- **30+ configurable manuscript checks:** More than 30 checks spanning ethics approval and informed consent, conflict of interest, data sharing, funding, author contributions, abstract structure, required headings, figures and tables, referencing style, word counts and file cleanliness.
- **No black box — linked evidence:** Every result is tied to the relevant marked-up section of the manuscript, so editors and authors can see exactly which sentence or heading produced the pass or fail — the criteria are published in the developer documentation.
- **Journal-by-journal configuration:** Journals decide which checks to run, which are critical, and how the feedback reads, defined on a journal-by-journal basis to match that publication's author guidelines.
- **In-platform and full reports:** Top-level results surface inside the manuscript handling software, while a full interactive report gives the deeper annotated view for editors and authors.
- **Metadata extraction:** Title, page numbers, double line spacing, registered trademarks and other metadata are pulled out automatically as part of every run.

## Cas d'usage principaux

- **Cut first-pass triage time (Managing editor):** Send submitted papers through Penelope first so incomplete or non-compliant manuscripts are returned to authors before a reviewer's time is spent.
- **Pre-flight your submission (Author):** Run the checks yourself before hitting submit and fix missing declarations, abstract structure issues or reference mismatches up front.
- **Enforce guidelines consistently (Journal operations lead):** Encode your own author guidelines as configurable checks and let automated feedback enforce them consistently across every article type.
- **Give authors actionable feedback (Editorial office staff):** Use the linked, section-level results to quickly explain to an author exactly why a manuscript was sent back and what to change.

## Forces

- Directly targets the tedious first-pass triage that eats editorial time
- Transparent criteria and linked evidence instead of an opaque score
- Per-journal configuration means feedback matches each publication's actual guidelines
- Metadata extraction comes bundled rather than as a paid add-on
- Author-facing feedback reduces the volume of incomplete submissions

## Limites

- No self-serve author checkout — authors get results only when their target journal has switched checks on
- Native integration is limited to Manuscript Manager today; Editorial Manager and ScholarOne users sit on a waiting list
- Checks are structural and policy-based, so it will not catch scientific or statistical errors in the content

## Questions fréquentes

### What kinds of checks does Penelope run?
Over 30 configurable checks across ethics and consent, declarations (conflict of interest, data sharing, funding, author contributions), title page and metadata, abstract structure, required headings, figures and tables, referencing style and citation/reference matching, word and reference counts, and file cleanliness such as track changes or Endnote citations.

### Can a journal customize which checks matter?
You choose which checks run, which failures are critical and non-negotiable, and the exact wording of feedback that editors and authors see — configured per journal.

### Which submission platforms does it integrate with?
Native integration is available for journals using Manuscript Manager. Journals on Editorial Manager or ScholarOne can join the waiting list for those integrations.

### How is Penelope priced?
Pricing is based on annual submission volume and includes the full suite of checks and metadata extraction, excluding VAT. Entry pricing is around £1.50 per submission at under 500 submissions a year, dropping as volume grows, with a discounted annual package available. Alternatively, journals can offer author-paid checks at no cost to the publisher.

### Does it review the science?
No. It is a structural and policy compliance checker for journal requirements. It does not assess scientific validity, statistics or the quality of the argument.

### Quel est le trafic mensuel et la tendance de croissance de Penelope ?
Penelope reçoit actuellement 3,01 k visites mensuelles, avec une variation de trafic mensuelle de -5,09 k (taux de croissance de -62,8 %). Son marché source principal est Global (— de part), dont 1,22 k visites directes/mois et — visites de recherche organique/mois.

### Penelope est-il gratuit ? Quel est son modèle tarifaire ?
Penelope fonctionne selon un modèle tarifaire Payant, Tarifs sur demande. Priced per journal by annual submission volume (excl. VAT), and every tier includes the full check suite plus metadata extraction. Indicative rates: around £1.50 per submission below 500 annual submissions, £1.20 for 501–1,000, £1.00 for 1,001–2,500, and £0.80 for 2,501–5,000 and above; annual packages are quoted as roughly £750, £1,350 and £2,850 in the lower bands, with higher volumes quoted directly. Publishers can alternatively let authors pay for checks themselves at no cost to the journal. Les plateformes de facturation et de paiement prises en charge incluent : non répertorié.

### Quelles sont les meilleures alternatives à Penelope en 2026 ?
Sur la base du trafic de catégorie et de l'adéquation des fonctionnalités sur OpenAITools.app, les cinq principales alternatives à Penelope sont : 1. Trinka AI (246,62 k visites/mois); 2. Thesify (116,87 k visites/mois); 3. Jenni (1,5 M visites/mois); 4. Writefull (209,12 k visites/mois); 5. Researcher.Life (341,9 k visites/mois).

### Quelles plateformes et capacités d'IA principales Penelope prend-il en charge ?
Penelope est classé sous Vérificateur par IA, Relecture IA, Outils IA pour articles de recherche, AI Writing Assistants, prend en charge les plateformes suivantes : Site web, et ses étiquettes de capacités principales incluent : Contrôle des manuscrits, Exigences des revues, Vérifications automatiques, Édition scientifique, Outils éditoriaux, Préparation des manuscrits.

## Alternatives

| Nom de l'outil | Visites mensuelles | Modèle tarifaire | Comparer |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| [Trinka AI](https://openaitools.app/fr/tool/trinka-ai-grammar-checker-tool) | 246 624 | Freemium | [Comparer](https://openaitools.app/fr/compare/penelope-ai-vs-trinka-ai-grammar-checker-tool) |
| [Thesify](https://openaitools.app/fr/tool/thesify) | 116 873 | Freemium | [Comparer](https://openaitools.app/fr/compare/penelope-ai-vs-thesify) |
| [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/fr/tool/jenni) | 1 498 133 | Freemium | [Comparer](https://openaitools.app/fr/compare/jenni-vs-penelope-ai) |
| [Writefull](https://openaitools.app/fr/tool/writefull-com) | 209 118 | Freemium, Payant, Tarifs sur demande | [Comparer](https://openaitools.app/fr/compare/penelope-ai-vs-writefull-com) |
| [Researcher.Life](https://openaitools.app/fr/tool/researcher-life) | 341 897 | Essai gratuit, Payant | [Comparer](https://openaitools.app/fr/compare/penelope-ai-vs-researcher-life) |
| [Scribbr](https://openaitools.app/fr/tool/scribbr) | 7 530 803 | Freemium | [Comparer](https://openaitools.app/fr/compare/penelope-ai-vs-scribbr) |
| [ProWritingAid](https://openaitools.app/fr/tool/prowritingaid-com) | 1 623 266 | Freemium, Payant | [Comparer](https://openaitools.app/fr/compare/penelope-ai-vs-prowritingaid-com) |
| [ThesisAI](https://openaitools.app/fr/tool/thesisai) | 224 434 | Payant | [Comparer](https://openaitools.app/fr/compare/penelope-ai-vs-thesisai) |
| [Aithor](https://openaitools.app/fr/tool/aithor) | 345 936 | Freemium | [Comparer](https://openaitools.app/fr/compare/aithor-vs-penelope-ai) |
| [Hemingway Editor](https://openaitools.app/fr/tool/hemingway-editor) | 605 169 | Essai gratuit, Payant, Gratuit | [Comparer](https://openaitools.app/fr/compare/hemingway-editor-vs-penelope-ai) |
| [Yomu AI](https://openaitools.app/fr/tool/yomu-ai) | 69 160 | Payant | [Comparer](https://openaitools.app/fr/compare/penelope-ai-vs-yomu-ai) |
| [CiteTrue](https://openaitools.app/fr/tool/citetrue) | 43 073 | Gratuit | [Comparer](https://openaitools.app/fr/compare/citetrue-vs-penelope-ai) |

---
Source : https://openaitools.app/fr/tool/penelope-ai