# Jellyfish (VibeOnly)

OpenAITools.app のテレメトリ（2026-11-11 検証）によると、Jellyfish (VibeOnly)（vibeonly.ai）は AI 採用に分類される AI プラットフォームで、月間 0 の訪問を生み出し、前月比のトラフィック増減は +0（0%）です。主要な地域市場はグローバル（トラフィックシェア —）で、Demo-based / contact sales の料金モデルで運営されています。月間ボリューム別の主な競合代替ツールには Workable（月間 1078.06万訪問）、TalentRecruit（月間 31.93万訪問）、Kula AI（月間 49.23万訪問）が含まれます。

Jellyfish, formerly VibeOnly, is an AI sourcing product for recruiting firms. Its agent, Amy, learns the judgment of your best recruiters from who they submit, reject, and place, then sources candidates the same way across every role.

## 主なテレメトリと仕様

| 指標 | 値 |
| :--- | :--- |
| ツール名 | Jellyfish (VibeOnly) |
| ハンドル | vibeonly |
| Status | active |
| Origin | independent |
| Maintenance | active |
| 公式ドメイン | vibeonly.ai |
| ウェブサイト URL | https://www.vibeonly.ai |
| カテゴリ | AI 採用, AI テスト, AI開発者ツール |
| 料金モデル | Demo-based / contact sales |
| 月間訪問数 | 0 |
| 前月比トラフィック変動 | 0 |
| 前月比成長率 | 0% |
| 主要市場 | グローバル |
| 市場シェア | — |
| ダイレクト訪問 | 0 |
| オーガニック検索訪問 | 0 |
| ソーシャル訪問 | 0 |
| リファラル訪問 | 0 |
| メール訪問 | 0 |
| レビュースコア | 3.8 |
| 保存数 | 0 |
| 対応プラットフォーム | ウェブサイト |
| 請求プラットフォーム |  |
| 属性 | 機能: ウェブサイト; 料金: 無料トライアル |
| タグ | AI スキル評価, 採用プラットフォーム, 人材採用, AI 活用力, 技術力評価, プロンプトエンジニアリング, UI チャレンジ, Vibeコーディング, AI ネイティブ人材 |

## 概要

Jellyfish, formerly VibeOnly, is an AI sourcing product for recruiting firms. Its agent, Amy, learns the judgment of your best recruiters from who they submit, reject, and place, then sources candidates the same way across every role.

## 料金とプラン

Jellyfish does not publish public pricing. Access starts with a live demo booked through the site, after which commercial terms are handled directly with the sales team. The legacy VibeOnly free trial is no longer advertised.

## 主な機能と特長

- **Taste learning from real outcomes:** Amy tracks who each recruiter submits, passes on, and places, then applies those patterns to future searches instead of relying on static filters.
- **Guided intake and requirement approval:** Paste a job order or call notes and Amy drafts the requirement list, suggests criteria you may have missed, and waits for your approval before anything is added.
- **Sourcing beyond LinkedIn:** Candidates are surfaced from projects, research, and online communities, with supporting evidence for each match so recruiters can judge fit before reaching out.
- **Autonomous sourcing and outreach:** Once Amy understands your taste, she can keep sourcing and contacting candidates while your team is on calls, with configurable autonomy per workflow step.
- **Cross-role and per-client memory:** What Amy learns on one search carries into the next, including different role types, while each client's requirements remain kept separate.

## 主なユースケース

- **Scale a boutique desk without adding sourcers (Recruiting agency owner):** Give Amy your firm's placement history and she can run sourcing on new job orders in the same style as your strongest biller, letting a small team cover more roles.
- **Find engineers that title searches miss (Technical recruiter):** Instead of filtering on job titles, let Amy read projects, research, and community activity to surface customer-facing engineers who would never appear in a keyword search.
- **Codify a team's screening judgment (Talent acquisition lead):** Capture the reasoning behind the candidates your team submits and rejects so new recruiters can produce comparable shortlists from day one.
- **Keep each client brief isolated and precise (Executive search consultant):** Use per-client requirement tracking and Amy's suggested additions to make sure nuanced constraints, like regulatory or clearance experience, are not overlooked.

## 強み

- Learns from actual submissions, rejections, and placements rather than static keyword filters
- Surfaces candidates from projects, research, and communities that LinkedIn-first searches overlook
- Requirement intake is collaborative — Amy proposes, you approve before criteria are locked in
- Configurable autonomy lets firms decide what runs on its own and what needs review
- Keeps memory across roles while separating each client's brief

## 制約・デメリット

- No public pricing or self-serve plan; you must book a demo to get started
- The rebrand from VibeOnly to Jellyfish can be confusing when searching for the product
- Value depends on having historical recruiting data for the model to learn from
- Best suited to recruiting firms and internal talent teams, not individual job seekers

## よくある質問

### Is Jellyfish the same product as VibeOnly?
Yes. VibeOnly has been rebranded as Jellyfish, operated by Jellybrain, Inc. The site at vibeonly.ai now presents Amy, the AI sourcing agent, and the recruiter application still signs in through recruiter.vibeonly.ai.

### What does Amy actually do?
Amy handles sourcing work: she takes in a job order or call notes, structures the requirements, searches for candidates beyond LinkedIn, explains why each person fits, and can run outreach on her own once she has learned your team's preferences.

### How does the AI learn a recruiter's judgment?
It observes outcomes. Every candidate a recruiter submits, passes on, or places becomes a signal, and Amy reuses those patterns on the next search, including for a different kind of role.

### Can I control how autonomous it is?
Yes. Firms decide which steps Amy performs independently and which she must check first, and each client's requirements are tracked separately.

### Does it replace recruiters?
No. Jellyfish is positioned as decision-support: it widens the candidate pool and removes manual searching so recruiters spend their time on calls, judgment, and placements.

### How much does it cost?
Pricing is not published publicly. The starting point is a live demo arranged through the website, where commercial details are discussed directly.

### Jellyfish (VibeOnly) の月間トラフィックと成長トレンドはどうですか？
Jellyfish (VibeOnly) は現在、月間 0 の訪問があり、前月比のトラフィック変動は +0（成長率 0%）です。主要な流入市場はグローバル（シェア —）で、月間 0 のダイレクト訪問と月間 0 のオーガニック検索訪問を含みます。

### Jellyfish (VibeOnly) は無料ですか？料金モデルは何ですか？
Jellyfish (VibeOnly) は Demo-based / contact sales の料金モデルで運営されています。Jellyfish does not publish public pricing. Access starts with a live demo booked through the site, after which commercial terms are handled directly with the sales team. The legacy VibeOnly free trial is no longer advertised. 対応する請求・チェックアウトプラットフォームには未掲載が含まれます。

### 2026年における Jellyfish (VibeOnly) の最適な代替ツールはどれですか？
OpenAITools.app のカテゴリ別トラフィックと機能の適合性に基づくと、Jellyfish (VibeOnly) の代替ツールトップ5は次のとおりです: 1. Workable（月間 1078.06万訪問）; 2. TalentRecruit（月間 31.93万訪問）; 3. Kula AI（月間 49.23万訪問）; 4. Jack and Jill（月間 125.43万訪問）; 5. Juicebox (PeopleGPT)（月間 29.32万訪問）。

### Jellyfish (VibeOnly) はどのプラットフォームと主要な AI 機能に対応していますか？
Jellyfish (VibeOnly) は AI 採用, AI テスト, AI開発者ツールに分類され、以下のプラットフォームに対応しています: ウェブサイト。中核機能のタグには AI スキル評価, 採用プラットフォーム, 人材採用, AI 活用力, 技術力評価, プロンプトエンジニアリングが含まれます。

## 代替ツール

| ツール名 | 月間訪問数 | 料金モデル | 比較 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| [Workable](https://openaitools.app/ja/tool/workable) | 10,780,627 | 無料トライアル、有料 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/ja/compare/vibeonly-vs-workable) |
| [TalentRecruit](https://openaitools.app/ja/tool/talentrecruit) | 319,337 | 料金は要問い合わせ | [比較](https://openaitools.app/ja/compare/talentrecruit-vs-vibeonly) |
| [Kula AI](https://openaitools.app/ja/tool/kula-ai) | 492,326 | 有料、料金は要問い合わせ | [比較](https://openaitools.app/ja/compare/kula-ai-vs-vibeonly) |
| [Jack and Jill](https://openaitools.app/ja/tool/jack-and-jill) | 1,254,267 | フリーミアム、料金は要問い合わせ | [比較](https://openaitools.app/ja/compare/jack-and-jill-vs-vibeonly) |
| [Juicebox (PeopleGPT)](https://openaitools.app/ja/tool/juicebox-work) | 293,157 | 有料 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/ja/compare/juicebox-work-vs-vibeonly) |
| [Manatal](https://openaitools.app/ja/tool/manatal) | 459,004 | 無料トライアル、有料 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/ja/compare/manatal-vs-vibeonly) |
| [Humanly](https://openaitools.app/ja/tool/humanly-io) | 109,717 | 料金は要問い合わせ | [比較](https://openaitools.app/ja/compare/humanly-io-vs-vibeonly) |
| [HireAI：Arc による AI 採用担当](https://openaitools.app/ja/tool/hireai-ai-recruiter-by-arc) | 496,923 | 有料 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/ja/compare/hireai-ai-recruiter-by-arc-vs-vibeonly) |
| [Helio.AI](https://openaitools.app/ja/tool/helio-ai) | 46,540 | 料金は要問い合わせ | [比較](https://openaitools.app/ja/compare/helio-ai-vs-vibeonly) |
| [TapTalent](https://openaitools.app/ja/tool/taptalent) | 15,849 | 料金は要問い合わせ | [比較](https://openaitools.app/ja/compare/taptalent-vs-vibeonly) |
| [Mercor](https://openaitools.app/ja/tool/mercor) | 67,221 | 料金は要問い合わせ | [比較](https://openaitools.app/ja/compare/mercor-vs-vibeonly) |
| [PyjamaHR](https://openaitools.app/ja/tool/pyjamahr) | 325,592 | 無料トライアル、有料、料金は要問い合わせ | [比較](https://openaitools.app/ja/compare/pyjamahr-vs-vibeonly) |

---
出典: https://openaitools.app/ja/tool/vibeonly