# Autosana

According to OpenAITools.app telemetry verified on 2026-11-11, Autosana (autosana.ai) is an AI platform indexed under AI Agent generating 12.06K monthly visits with a month-over-month traffic delta of +7K (+138.3%). Its primary geographic market is India (55% traffic share), and it operates on a Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing model. Top competing alternatives by monthly volume include KaneAI (901.34K visits/mo), Autify (60.13K visits/mo), QA.tech (30.55K visits/mo).

Natural-language end-to-end testing for mobile and web apps

## Key Telemetry & Specifications

| Metric | Value |
| :--- | :--- |
| Tool Name | Autosana |
| Handle | autosana |
| Status | active |
| Origin | independent |
| Maintenance | active |
| Official Domain | autosana.ai |
| Website URL | https://autosana.ai |
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Testing, AI Developer Tools, No-Code&Low-Code |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 12,057 |
| MoM Traffic Change | 6,997 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +138.3% |
| Primary Market | India |
| Market Share | 55% |
| Direct Visits | 6,410 |
| Organic Search Visits | — |
| Social Visits | — |
| Referral Visits | 1,205 |
| Email Visits | 243 |
| Review Score | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 1 |
| Supported Platforms | Website |
| Billing Platforms |  |
| Attributes | Pricing: Contact for Pricing; Features: Website |
| Tags | mobile app testing, E2E testing, automated testing, QA automation, mobile testing, iOS testing, Android testing, no-code testing, AI testing, mobile QA, app testing platform, mobile QA agent, natural language testing, self-healing tests, QA agent, mobile app testing agent, mobile app testing platform, mobile app testing tool, mobile app testing framework, Y Combinator |

## Overview

Autosana replaces brittle selector-based test scripts with short natural-language flow files. You describe what a user should do and what should happen along the way, and AI agents carry out those steps against iOS and Android builds, web browsers, Chrome extensions, and App Clips. Because the flows describe intent rather than specific UI elements, they keep working when a redesign moves buttons or changes layout, removing much of the maintenance burden that makes traditional E2E suites expensive.

The platform is designed to fit into existing engineering workflows rather than sit beside them. Flows and suites live in your repository as code, a GitHub bot runs the flows touched by each pull request on that PR's build and posts videos and results back to the PR, and cached steps replay five to eight times faster to keep CI time down. Coding agents can create, run, and fix flows locally through the CLI or MCP before a PR is even opened, and setups that need backend state can use hooks, environments, and secrets.

Beyond simple pass/fail, Autosana records runs step by step with video, captures every network request made during a run, monitors CPU and memory to surface slow or memory-hungry screens, and reports bugs and confusing UX it encounters while testing. Results route to Slack, email, webhooks, Linear, and Jira. The vendor offers a free pay-as-you-go tier with 1,000 AI actions per month, a Startup plan at $999 per month, a Pro plan at $2,499 per month, and custom Enterprise pricing with SOC 2 documentation and a dedicated forward-deployed engineer.

## Pricing & Plans

Free pay-as-you-go tier with up to 1,000 AI actions refilled monthly; Startup at $999/month with 15,000 AI actions; Pro at $2,499/month with 50,000 AI actions; Enterprise custom pricing. Paid plans include a 30-day money-back guarantee.

## Key Features & Capabilities

- **Natural-language flow authoring:** Write a user journey in a sentence instead of maintaining selectors or scripts; flows live in your repo as YAML and run across iOS, Android, web, Chrome extensions, and App Clips.
- **Self-healing tests:** When the UI is redesigned, flows adapt automatically as long as the underlying user journey is unchanged, so you do not rewrite tests after a visual refresh.
- **Pull-request CI integration:** A GitHub bot runs the flows a change touches on the PR's build, posts pass/fail results and run videos on the PR, and reviewers can see exactly what broke.
- **Coding-agent workflow via CLI and MCP:** Run flows locally through the CLI or MCP so AI coding agents can reproduce a failure, patch the code, and verify the fix before opening the pull request.
- **Deep debugging telemetry:** Step-by-step run recordings with video, network request logs, CPU and memory monitoring, plus automated bug and UX reports; results flow into Slack, Linear, and Jira.

## Primary Use Cases

- **Regression suites without script maintenance (Mobile QA engineer):** Replace a large Maestro or Appium suite with intent-based flows that survive UI redesigns, cutting regression time from days to about an hour.
- **Gate every pull request on real builds (Mobile platform lead):** Run the flows affected by a change on the PR build and block merges until they pass, so regressions are caught before they reach users.
- **Let coding agents verify their own changes (AI-assisted developer):** Expose Autosana over MCP so an AI coding agent can run a flow, read the failure, fix the code, and re-run the test locally without human intervention.
- **Test checkout, purchases, and auth flows (Growth and monetization engineer):** Cover in-app purchases, RevenueCat entitlements, email and SMS OTP logins, push notifications, and deep links that are hard to verify manually.

## Strengths

- Flows are written in natural language and stored as code in your repository
- Self-healing behaviour drastically reduces E2E maintenance vs. selector-based tools
- Broad platform coverage across iOS, Android, web, Chrome extensions, and App Clips
- Free tier with 1,000 AI actions per month and no credit card required to start
- Strong CI and tooling story: GitHub PR bot, MCP, CLI, API, Slack, Linear, Jira

## Limitations

- Paid tiers are expensive for small teams ($999/month for Startup)
- Usage is metered in AI actions, so heavy test suites require careful cost planning
- Powerful features such as parallel cloud sessions and physical devices are gated to upper tiers

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Do I have to rewrite tests when my UI changes?
No. Flows describe the user journey rather than specific selectors, so as long as the intent is intact they adapt to layout and component changes automatically.

### Can I run Autosana locally?
Yes. Local runs and CLI/MCP access are available across plans, letting you test against localhost and your own simulators before pushing.

### Where do my tests live?
Flows and suites are stored in your repository as code, so they are versioned alongside the app and reviewed like any other change.

### How much does Autosana cost?
Pay-as-you-go starts free with up to 1,000 AI actions per month, then $0.10 per AI action. Startup is $999/month (15,000 actions) and Pro is $2,499/month (50,000 actions); Enterprise is custom.

### What is Autosana's monthly traffic and growth trend?
Autosana currently receives 12.06K monthly visits, with a month-over-month traffic change of +7K (+138.3% growth rate). Its primary source market is India (55% share), including 6.41K direct visits/mo and — organic search visits/mo.

### Is Autosana free? What is its pricing model?
Autosana operates on a Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing model. Free pay-as-you-go tier with up to 1,000 AI actions refilled monthly; Startup at $999/month with 15,000 AI actions; Pro at $2,499/month with 50,000 AI actions; Enterprise custom pricing. Paid plans include a 30-day money-back guarantee. Supported billing and checkout platforms include: not listed.

### What are the best Autosana alternatives in 2026?
Based on OpenAITools.app category traffic and feature fit, the top five alternatives to Autosana are: 1. KaneAI (901.34K visits/mo); 2. Autify (60.13K visits/mo); 3. QA.tech (30.55K visits/mo); 4. testRigor (105.87K visits/mo); 5. Virtuoso QA (20.17K visits/mo).

### Which platforms and core AI capabilities does Autosana support?
Autosana is classified under AI Agent, AI Testing, AI Developer Tools, No-Code&Low-Code, supports the following platforms: Website, and its core capability tags include: mobile app testing, E2E testing, automated testing, QA automation, mobile testing, iOS testing.

## Alternatives

| Tool Name | Monthly Visits | Pricing Model | Compare |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| [KaneAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai) | 901,340 | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/autosana-vs-kaneai) |
| [Autify](https://openaitools.app/tool/autify-com) | 60,130 | Contact for Pricing | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/autify-com-vs-autosana) |
| [QA.tech](https://openaitools.app/tool/qa-tech) | 30,550 | Paid, Contact for Pricing | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/autosana-vs-qa-tech) |
| [testRigor](https://openaitools.app/tool/testrigor-com) | 105,865 | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/autosana-vs-testrigor-com) |
| [Virtuoso QA](https://openaitools.app/tool/virtuoso-qa) | 20,169 | Paid, Contact for Pricing | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/autosana-vs-virtuoso-qa) |
| [Katalon](https://openaitools.app/tool/katalon-studio) | 158,090 | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/autosana-vs-katalon-studio) |
| [Momentic](https://openaitools.app/tool/momentic) | 68,819 | Freemium, Usage-based, Enterprise | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/autosana-vs-momentic) |
| [TestSprite](https://openaitools.app/tool/testsprite) | 114,205 | Freemium | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/autosana-vs-testsprite) |
| [Pie](https://openaitools.app/tool/pie) | 11,551 | Contact for Pricing | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/autosana-vs-pie) |
| [Drizz](https://openaitools.app/tool/drizz) | 40,750 | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/autosana-vs-drizz) |
| [Qase](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase) | 319,213 | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/autosana-vs-qase) |
| [Shiplight AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/shiplight-ai) | 33,676 | Contact for Pricing | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/autosana-vs-shiplight-ai) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/tool/autosana