# isvisible.ai

According to OpenAITools.app telemetry verified on 2026-11-11, isvisible.ai (isvisible.ai) is an AI platform indexed under AI SEO Tools generating 0 monthly visits with a month-over-month traffic delta of +0 (0%). Its primary geographic market is Global (— traffic share), and it operates on a Free pricing model. Top competing alternatives by monthly volume include Diib (120.02K visits/mo), findable. (25.38K visits/mo), Surfer (249.6K visits/mo).

See whether ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI can reach your site

## Key Telemetry & Specifications

| Metric | Value |
| :--- | :--- |
| Tool Name | isvisible.ai |
| Handle | isvisible-ai |
| Status | active |
| Origin | independent |
| Maintenance | active |
| Official Domain | isvisible.ai |
| Website URL | https://isvisible.ai |
| Categories | AI SEO Tools, AI API, AI Checker |
| Pricing Model | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 0 |
| MoM Traffic Change | 0 |
| MoM Growth Rate | 0% |
| Primary Market | Global |
| Market Share | — |
| Direct Visits | 0 |
| Organic Search Visits | 0 |
| Social Visits | 0 |
| Referral Visits | 0 |
| Email Visits | 0 |
| Review Score | 4.6 |
| Saved Count | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website |
| Billing Platforms |  |
| Attributes | Pricing: Free; Features: Website |
| Tags | AI visibility audit, AI SEO, robots.txt checker, llms.txt checker, AI crawler access, GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, OpenAI search crawler, ChatGPT browsing, search engine indexing, AI answer engines, generative engine optimization, technical SEO, website audit, crawler permissions, site access analysis, instant report, 0-100 scoring, agent-by-agent access map, live probe, PDF report, public API, no signup required |

## Overview

isvisible.ai is a free web tool that answers whether AI assistants can actually see a website. Instead of measuring classic rankings, it tests accessibility for the crawlers that feed generative engines: it reads the rules a site declares in robots.txt and llms.txt, then sends live requests using each crawler's real user-agent string. An agent counts as allowed only when both the declared rule and the live response agree, which catches the common case of a site advertising access on paper while a server or WAF quietly rejects the request.

Thirteen agents are covered in three groups. Search crawlers such as Googlebot and Bingbot power AI-assisted search results, live-answer crawlers such as ChatGPT browsing, Claude browsing and the Perplexity crawler fetch pages when a user asks a question, and training crawlers such as GPTBot, Google-Extended, Apple Intelligence, Meta AI and ByteDance collect content for model training. Training agents that are blocked are reported as opted out rather than penalised, because blocking them is a licensing choice, not an error. The report returns a 0-100 score split into AI Visibility, Content Structure and Technical Infrastructure, plus a letter grade, an agent-by-agent access map, per-page scores across subdomains and a list of unique improvements ranked by impact and effort.

The service requires no signup: enter a URL and the report is generated in seconds, downloadable as a PDF and, per the site, never shared with third parties. Results are cached for 60 minutes and a public API is available for teams that want to run the same checks from their own tooling. It complements rather than replaces classic SEO, because a page can rank well in traditional search and still be invisible to the assistants that increasingly answer user questions.

## Pricing & Plans

Completely free. The audit requires no account, no signup and no credit card: you submit a URL and receive the full report, including the 0-100 score, agent-by-agent access map, per-page matrix, ranked recommendations and PDF download. A public API is also offered for programmatic checks. Because there are no paid tiers, there is no cost cap to weigh against usage.

## Key Features & Capabilities

- **Dual-signal verification:** Declared robots.txt and llms.txt rules are combined with live requests sent under each crawler's real user-agent string, so 'allowed' only applies when both signals agree.
- **Thirteen agents mapped one by one:** The report labels every crawler as allowed, blocked or opted out, and separates search crawlers, AI training crawlers and live-answer crawlers so licensing choices are visible but not penalised.
- **Three-part 0-100 score:** AI Visibility, Content Structure and Technical Infrastructure are scored separately, weighted, and returned with a letter grade from Excellent down to Poor so weak areas are obvious at a glance.
- **Per-page performance matrix:** Up to five pages across multiple hosts are scored individually with category averages, showing the spread between your best and worst URL so one site-wide fix is not assumed to be enough.
- **Ranked recommendations and PDF export:** Each report lists unique improvements tagged by impact and effort, grouped into high impact and quick wins, and can be downloaded as a PDF or consumed through a public API.

## Primary Use Cases

- **Screen prospects before a paid engagement (Technical SEO and GEO consultants):** Run the free audit during a discovery call to show an agent-by-agent access map and a ranked fix list, demonstrating in seconds where a client's site is losing AI visibility.
- **Check whether AI assistants can cite your content (Site owners and marketing teams):** Confirm that ChatGPT browsing, Claude browsing and the Perplexity crawler are allowed in both robots.txt and practice, so the pages you publish can actually be quoted in AI answers.
- **Monitor AI access after firewall or robots changes (DevOps and growth engineers):** Call the public API after deploying a CDN, WAF or robots.txt change to catch silent blocks that would otherwise never show up in browser-based testing.
- **Separate search access from training consent (Publishers and content licensing teams):** Read the report's training-consent section to document which model-training crawlers you allow and which you opt out of, without that choice distorting your visibility score.

## Strengths

- Truly free with no signup, no account and no credit card required
- Cross-checks declared robots.txt and llms.txt rules against live requests using real user-agent strings
- Reports thirteen agents, including ChatGPT browsing, Claude browsing and Perplexity, not just training crawlers
- Presents a per-page matrix across subdomains plus ranked recommendations, so fixes can be prioritised by impact
- PDF export and a public API make the output easy to share or embed in existing monitoring

## Limitations

- Blocking training crawlers costs no points, so the score does not express whether you are comfortable being used for model training
- Reports are cached for 60 minutes, so immediate re-checks may return the previous result
- Analysis is limited to a small set of pages and host-level technical checks rather than a full deep crawl of large sites

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Is the audit really free and does it need an account?
Yes. You paste a URL and the check starts immediately with no signup and no credit card. Reports are generated by isvisible.ai and, per the site, are never shared with third parties, and the PDF can be downloaded directly.

### What is the difference between declared rules and the live probe?
Declared rules come from reading robots.txt and llms.txt. The live probe sends real requests using each crawler's actual user-agent string. An agent only counts as allowed if both agree, which prevents a site from claiming access on paper while blocking it in practice.

### Which crawlers are included?
Thirteen agents are checked, grouped into search crawlers such as Googlebot and Bingbot, AI training crawlers such as GPTBot, Google-Extended, ClaudeBot, Apple Intelligence, Meta AI and ByteDance, and live-answer crawlers such as ChatGPT browsing, Claude browsing and the Perplexity crawler.

### Does blocking training crawlers hurt my score?
No. Blocking model-training crawlers is treated as a licensing decision rather than a fault, so training agents appear as opted out and cost no points either way. The score focuses on whether search and answer engines can reach your content.

### What is isvisible.ai's monthly traffic and growth trend?
isvisible.ai currently receives 0 monthly visits, with a month-over-month traffic change of +0 (0% growth rate). Its primary source market is Global (— share), including 0 direct visits/mo and 0 organic search visits/mo.

### Is isvisible.ai free? What is its pricing model?
isvisible.ai operates on a Free pricing model. Completely free. The audit requires no account, no signup and no credit card: you submit a URL and receive the full report, including the 0-100 score, agent-by-agent access map, per-page matrix, ranked recommendations and PDF download. A public API is also offered for programmatic checks. Because there are no paid tiers, there is no cost cap to weigh against usage. Supported billing and checkout platforms include: not listed.

### What are the best isvisible.ai alternatives in 2026?
Based on OpenAITools.app category traffic and feature fit, the top five alternatives to isvisible.ai are: 1. Diib (120.02K visits/mo); 2. findable. (25.38K visits/mo); 3. Surfer (249.6K visits/mo); 4. Creaitor (34.65K visits/mo); 5. Peec AI (262.09K visits/mo).

### Which platforms and core AI capabilities does isvisible.ai support?
isvisible.ai is classified under AI SEO Tools, AI API, AI Checker, supports the following platforms: Website, and its core capability tags include: AI visibility audit, AI SEO, robots.txt checker, llms.txt checker, AI crawler access, GPTBot.

## Alternatives

| Tool Name | Monthly Visits | Pricing Model | Compare |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| [Diib](https://openaitools.app/tool/diib-com) | 120,016 | Freemium | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/diib-com-vs-isvisible-ai) |
| [findable.](https://openaitools.app/tool/findable) | 25,378 | Free Trial, Paid | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/findable-vs-isvisible-ai) |
| [Surfer](https://openaitools.app/tool/surferseo-com) | 249,599 | Paid, Contact for Pricing | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/isvisible-ai-vs-surferseo-com) |
| [Creaitor](https://openaitools.app/tool/creaitor-ai) | 34,646 | Free Trial, Paid | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/creaitor-ai-vs-isvisible-ai) |
| [Peec AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/peec-ai) | 262,088 | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/isvisible-ai-vs-peec-ai) |
| [LLM Pulse](https://openaitools.app/tool/llm-pulse) | 84,725 | Paid | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/isvisible-ai-vs-llm-pulse) |
| [SEOmator](https://openaitools.app/tool/seomator) | 187,850 | Freemium, Paid | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/isvisible-ai-vs-seomator) |
| [Rankability](https://openaitools.app/tool/rankability) | 84,715 | Free Trial, Paid | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/isvisible-ai-vs-rankability) |
| [Otterly.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/otterly-ai) | 122,389 | Free Trial, Paid | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/isvisible-ai-vs-otterly-ai) |
| [Rush Analytics](https://openaitools.app/tool/rush-analytics) | 28,578 | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/isvisible-ai-vs-rush-analytics) |
| [Nimt.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/nimt-ai) | 9,476 | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/isvisible-ai-vs-nimt-ai) |
| [Nightwatch](https://openaitools.app/tool/nightwatch-io) | 71,889 | Free Trial, Paid | [Compare](https://openaitools.app/compare/isvisible-ai-vs-nightwatch-io) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/tool/isvisible-ai