Models.dev 每月有 200,451 次造訪,月增率 -3.9%,定價模式為免費。Prolific 每月有 18,697,671 次造訪,成長率 -1.8%,定價模式為付費。
| 面向/指標 | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| 官方網域 | models.dev | prolific.com |
| 定價模式 | 免費 | 付費 |
| 每月造訪次數 | 20.05萬 (200,451) | 1869.77萬 (18,697,671) |
| 月流量變化量 | -8167 (-3.9%) | -35.2萬 (-1.8%) |
| 主要市場與市佔 | 🇨🇳 中國 (23%) | 🇺🇸 美國 (48.8%) |
| 每月直接造訪 | 13.63萬 | 1297.97萬 |
| 使用者評分 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| 支援平台 | 網站 | 網站 |

開源 AI 模型資料庫,價格與能力一目了然
每個模型採用統一的 provider/model 格式,方便跨供應商直接對比同一模型。
並排查看上下文視窗、輸出上限、推理、工具呼叫、結構化輸出與溫度支援。
列出每百萬 token 的輸入輸出價格,並標註發布與更新日期。
在一個可排序目錄中同時涵蓋閉源旗艦 API 與各實驗室的開放權重模型。
為 AI 訓練、評估與研究提供高品質人類資料
依詳細的人口統計、職業與行為條件篩選參與者,觸達小眾或具代表性的樣本,而非泛泛的人群。
採集用於模型微調的人類偏好資料,執行安全性評估與紅隊測試,並透過回饋 API 把人工環節接入自動化流程。
注意力檢驗、誠實度篩查與審批流程,協助你在分析結果前剔除敷衍或欺詐性回答。
發布研究後能迅速開始收集回答,工具支援篩選條件、配額設定與縱向研究設計。

專項更強SuperAnnotate is an AI data platform that combines a collaborative multimodal annotation editor, an expert data-operations team, and the orchestration layer needed to move curated datasets into training, evaluation, and production pipelines. It is aimed at teams building computer vision, NLP, audio, and generative AI systems who need reliable, high-quality ground truth at scale.
專項更強SuperAnnotate is an AI data platform that combines a collaborative multimodal annotation editor, an expert data-operations team, and the orchestration layer needed to move curated datasets into training, evaluation, and production pipelines. It is aimed at teams building computer vision, NLP, audio, and generative AI systems who need reliable, high-quality ground truth at scale.

專項更強提供用於專業研究已驗證的 B2B 專業人士與醫療專家,但缺乏廣泛的一般大眾學術調查小組。

專項更強Includes model pricing trackers and developer news alongside tools directories, but less focused on raw API specs.

免費 / 開源Open-source data labeling and evaluation platform for AI workflows, but requires bringing your own annotation workforce.
免費 / 開源Open-source data labeling and evaluation platform for AI workflows, but requires bringing your own annotation workforce.

專項更強Catalogues and compares AI infrastructure tools and services across categories, but lacks deep per-token pricing tables.
專項更強Catalogues and compares AI infrastructure tools and services across categories, but lacks deep per-token pricing tables.
專項更強Runs automated user interviews and usability tests with real or synthetic personas, but lacks a massive human participant pool.