# Penelope

依據 OpenAITools.app 於 2026-11-11 查驗的觀測資料，Penelope（penelope.ai）是收錄於 AI 檢測工具的 AI 平台，每月產生 3010 次造訪，月流量變化量為 -5086（-62.8%）。其主要地理市場為全球（流量佔比 —），並採用付費、需聯絡報價定價模式。依每月流量計算的主要競爭替代方案包括 Trinka AI（每月 24.66萬次造訪），Thesify（每月 11.69萬次造訪），Jenni（每月 149.81萬次造訪）。

Penelope.ai automates pre-submission manuscript checking for academic journals. It inspects a submission against that journal's own author guidelines — ethics, declarations, abstract structure, figures and tables, referencing style, word counts and file cleanliness — and returns an annotated report linking every result back to the exact passage that triggered it. Editors cut triage time; authors find out what is missing before they submit.

## 主要觀測資料與規格

| 指標 | 數值 |
| :--- | :--- |
| 工具名稱 | Penelope |
| 代稱 | penelope-ai |
| Status | active |
| Origin | independent |
| Maintenance | active |
| 官方網域 | penelope.ai |
| 網站網址 | https://penelope.ai |
| 分類 | AI 檢測工具, AI 校對, AI 研究論文工具, AI Writing Assistants, AI 研究工具, AI 文件擷取 |
| 定價模式 | 付費、需聯絡報價 |
| 每月造訪次數 | 3,010 |
| 月流量變化 | -5,086 |
| 月成長率 | -62.8% |
| 主要市場 | 全球 |
| 市佔率 | — |
| 直接造訪 | 1,216 |
| 自然搜尋造訪 | — |
| 社群造訪 | — |
| 推薦流量造訪 | 319 |
| 電子郵件造訪 | 103 |
| 評論分數 | 4.2 |
| 收藏數 | 0 |
| 支援平台 | 網站 |
| 帳務平台 |  |
| 屬性 | 功能: 網站; 價格: 付費; 價格: 需聯絡報價 |
| 標籤 | 稿件檢查, 期刊要求, 自動檢查, 科學出版, 編輯工具, 稿件準備, 參考文獻檢查, 倫理合規, 資料共享, 作者貢獻, 字數統計, 摘要, 圖與表, 引用格式, 檔案整潔度, 中繼資料 |

## 總覽

Penelope.ai automates pre-submission manuscript checking for academic journals. It inspects a submission against that journal's own author guidelines — ethics, declarations, abstract structure, figures and tables, referencing style, word counts and file cleanliness — and returns an annotated report linking every result back to the exact passage that triggered it. Editors cut triage time; authors find out what is missing before they submit.

## 價格與方案

Priced per journal by annual submission volume (excl. VAT), and every tier includes the full check suite plus metadata extraction. Indicative rates: around £1.50 per submission below 500 annual submissions, £1.20 for 501–1,000, £1.00 for 1,001–2,500, and £0.80 for 2,501–5,000 and above; annual packages are quoted as roughly £750, £1,350 and £2,850 in the lower bands, with higher volumes quoted directly. Publishers can alternatively let authors pay for checks themselves at no cost to the journal.

## 關鍵功能與能力

- **30+ configurable manuscript checks:** More than 30 checks spanning ethics approval and informed consent, conflict of interest, data sharing, funding, author contributions, abstract structure, required headings, figures and tables, referencing style, word counts and file cleanliness.
- **No black box — linked evidence:** Every result is tied to the relevant marked-up section of the manuscript, so editors and authors can see exactly which sentence or heading produced the pass or fail — the criteria are published in the developer documentation.
- **Journal-by-journal configuration:** Journals decide which checks to run, which are critical, and how the feedback reads, defined on a journal-by-journal basis to match that publication's author guidelines.
- **In-platform and full reports:** Top-level results surface inside the manuscript handling software, while a full interactive report gives the deeper annotated view for editors and authors.
- **Metadata extraction:** Title, page numbers, double line spacing, registered trademarks and other metadata are pulled out automatically as part of every run.

## 主要使用情境

- **Cut first-pass triage time (Managing editor):** Send submitted papers through Penelope first so incomplete or non-compliant manuscripts are returned to authors before a reviewer's time is spent.
- **Pre-flight your submission (Author):** Run the checks yourself before hitting submit and fix missing declarations, abstract structure issues or reference mismatches up front.
- **Enforce guidelines consistently (Journal operations lead):** Encode your own author guidelines as configurable checks and let automated feedback enforce them consistently across every article type.
- **Give authors actionable feedback (Editorial office staff):** Use the linked, section-level results to quickly explain to an author exactly why a manuscript was sent back and what to change.

## 優勢

- Directly targets the tedious first-pass triage that eats editorial time
- Transparent criteria and linked evidence instead of an opaque score
- Per-journal configuration means feedback matches each publication's actual guidelines
- Metadata extraction comes bundled rather than as a paid add-on
- Author-facing feedback reduces the volume of incomplete submissions

## 限制

- No self-serve author checkout — authors get results only when their target journal has switched checks on
- Native integration is limited to Manuscript Manager today; Editorial Manager and ScholarOne users sit on a waiting list
- Checks are structural and policy-based, so it will not catch scientific or statistical errors in the content

## 常見問題

### What kinds of checks does Penelope run?
Over 30 configurable checks across ethics and consent, declarations (conflict of interest, data sharing, funding, author contributions), title page and metadata, abstract structure, required headings, figures and tables, referencing style and citation/reference matching, word and reference counts, and file cleanliness such as track changes or Endnote citations.

### Can a journal customize which checks matter?
You choose which checks run, which failures are critical and non-negotiable, and the exact wording of feedback that editors and authors see — configured per journal.

### Which submission platforms does it integrate with?
Native integration is available for journals using Manuscript Manager. Journals on Editorial Manager or ScholarOne can join the waiting list for those integrations.

### How is Penelope priced?
Pricing is based on annual submission volume and includes the full suite of checks and metadata extraction, excluding VAT. Entry pricing is around £1.50 per submission at under 500 submissions a year, dropping as volume grows, with a discounted annual package available. Alternatively, journals can offer author-paid checks at no cost to the publisher.

### Does it review the science?
No. It is a structural and policy compliance checker for journal requirements. It does not assess scientific validity, statistics or the quality of the argument.

### Penelope 的每月流量與成長趨勢為何？
Penelope 目前每月有 3010 次造訪，月流量變化為 -5086（成長率 -62.8%）。其主要來源市場為全球（佔比 —），其中包含每月 1216 次直接造訪與每月 — 次自然搜尋造訪。

### Penelope 是免費的嗎？其定價模式為何？
Penelope 採用付費、需聯絡報價定價模式。Priced per journal by annual submission volume (excl. VAT), and every tier includes the full check suite plus metadata extraction. Indicative rates: around £1.50 per submission below 500 annual submissions, £1.20 for 501–1,000, £1.00 for 1,001–2,500, and £0.80 for 2,501–5,000 and above; annual packages are quoted as roughly £750, £1,350 and £2,850 in the lower bands, with higher volumes quoted directly. Publishers can alternatively let authors pay for checks themselves at no cost to the journal. 支援的帳務與結帳平台包括：未列出。

### 2026 年最佳的 Penelope 替代方案有哪些？
依據 OpenAITools.app 的分類流量與功能契合度，Penelope 的前五大替代方案為：1. Trinka AI（每月 24.66萬次造訪）; 2. Thesify（每月 11.69萬次造訪）; 3. Jenni（每月 149.81萬次造訪）; 4. Writefull（每月 20.91萬次造訪）; 5. Researcher.Life（每月 34.19萬次造訪）。

### Penelope 支援哪些平台與核心 AI 能力？
Penelope 分類於 AI 檢測工具, AI 校對, AI 研究論文工具, AI Writing Assistants，支援以下平台：網站，其核心能力標籤包括：稿件檢查, 期刊要求, 自動檢查, 科學出版, 編輯工具, 稿件準備。

## 替代方案

| 工具名稱 | 每月造訪次數 | 定價模式 | 比較 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| [Trinka AI](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/trinka-ai-grammar-checker-tool) | 246,624 | 免費增值 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/penelope-ai-vs-trinka-ai-grammar-checker-tool) |
| [Thesify](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/thesify) | 116,873 | 免費增值 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/penelope-ai-vs-thesify) |
| [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | 免費增值 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/jenni-vs-penelope-ai) |
| [Writefull](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/writefull-com) | 209,118 | 免費增值、付費、需聯絡報價 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/penelope-ai-vs-writefull-com) |
| [Researcher.Life](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/researcher-life) | 341,897 | 免費試用、付費 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/penelope-ai-vs-researcher-life) |
| [Scribbr](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/scribbr) | 7,530,803 | 免費增值 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/penelope-ai-vs-scribbr) |
| [ProWritingAid](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/prowritingaid-com) | 1,623,266 | 免費增值、付費 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/penelope-ai-vs-prowritingaid-com) |
| [ThesisAI](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/thesisai) | 224,434 | 付費 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/penelope-ai-vs-thesisai) |
| [Aithor](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/aithor) | 345,936 | 免費增值 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/aithor-vs-penelope-ai) |
| [Hemingway Editor](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/hemingway-editor) | 605,169 | 免費試用、付費、免費 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/hemingway-editor-vs-penelope-ai) |
| [Yomu AI](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/yomu-ai) | 69,160 | 付費 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/penelope-ai-vs-yomu-ai) |
| [CiteTrue](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/citetrue) | 43,073 | 免費 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/citetrue-vs-penelope-ai) |

---
來源：https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/penelope-ai