# Jellyfish (VibeOnly)

依據 OpenAITools.app 於 2026-11-11 查驗的觀測資料，Jellyfish (VibeOnly)（vibeonly.ai）是收錄於 AI 招募的 AI 平台，每月產生 0 次造訪，月流量變化量為 +0（0%）。其主要地理市場為全球（流量佔比 —），並採用 Demo-based / contact sales 定價模式。依每月流量計算的主要競爭替代方案包括 Workable（每月 1078.06萬次造訪），TalentRecruit（每月 31.93萬次造訪），Kula AI（每月 49.23萬次造訪）。

Jellyfish, formerly VibeOnly, is an AI sourcing product for recruiting firms. Its agent, Amy, learns the judgment of your best recruiters from who they submit, reject, and place, then sources candidates the same way across every role.

## 主要觀測資料與規格

| 指標 | 數值 |
| :--- | :--- |
| 工具名稱 | Jellyfish (VibeOnly) |
| 代稱 | vibeonly |
| Status | active |
| Origin | independent |
| Maintenance | active |
| 官方網域 | vibeonly.ai |
| 網站網址 | https://www.vibeonly.ai |
| 分類 | AI 招募, AI 測試, AI 開發者工具 |
| 定價模式 | Demo-based / contact sales |
| 每月造訪次數 | 0 |
| 月流量變化 | 0 |
| 月成長率 | 0% |
| 主要市場 | 全球 |
| 市佔率 | — |
| 直接造訪 | 0 |
| 自然搜尋造訪 | 0 |
| 社群造訪 | 0 |
| 推薦流量造訪 | 0 |
| 電子郵件造訪 | 0 |
| 評論分數 | 3.8 |
| 收藏數 | 0 |
| 支援平台 | 網站 |
| 帳務平台 |  |
| 屬性 | 功能: 網站; 價格: 免費試用 |
| 標籤 | AI 技能評估, 徵才平台, 人才招募, AI 熟練度, 技術能力評估, 提示詞工程, UI 挑戰, 氛圍編程, AI 原生人才 |

## 總覽

Jellyfish, formerly VibeOnly, is an AI sourcing product for recruiting firms. Its agent, Amy, learns the judgment of your best recruiters from who they submit, reject, and place, then sources candidates the same way across every role.

## 價格與方案

Jellyfish does not publish public pricing. Access starts with a live demo booked through the site, after which commercial terms are handled directly with the sales team. The legacy VibeOnly free trial is no longer advertised.

## 關鍵功能與能力

- **Taste learning from real outcomes:** Amy tracks who each recruiter submits, passes on, and places, then applies those patterns to future searches instead of relying on static filters.
- **Guided intake and requirement approval:** Paste a job order or call notes and Amy drafts the requirement list, suggests criteria you may have missed, and waits for your approval before anything is added.
- **Sourcing beyond LinkedIn:** Candidates are surfaced from projects, research, and online communities, with supporting evidence for each match so recruiters can judge fit before reaching out.
- **Autonomous sourcing and outreach:** Once Amy understands your taste, she can keep sourcing and contacting candidates while your team is on calls, with configurable autonomy per workflow step.
- **Cross-role and per-client memory:** What Amy learns on one search carries into the next, including different role types, while each client's requirements remain kept separate.

## 主要使用情境

- **Scale a boutique desk without adding sourcers (Recruiting agency owner):** Give Amy your firm's placement history and she can run sourcing on new job orders in the same style as your strongest biller, letting a small team cover more roles.
- **Find engineers that title searches miss (Technical recruiter):** Instead of filtering on job titles, let Amy read projects, research, and community activity to surface customer-facing engineers who would never appear in a keyword search.
- **Codify a team's screening judgment (Talent acquisition lead):** Capture the reasoning behind the candidates your team submits and rejects so new recruiters can produce comparable shortlists from day one.
- **Keep each client brief isolated and precise (Executive search consultant):** Use per-client requirement tracking and Amy's suggested additions to make sure nuanced constraints, like regulatory or clearance experience, are not overlooked.

## 優勢

- Learns from actual submissions, rejections, and placements rather than static keyword filters
- Surfaces candidates from projects, research, and communities that LinkedIn-first searches overlook
- Requirement intake is collaborative — Amy proposes, you approve before criteria are locked in
- Configurable autonomy lets firms decide what runs on its own and what needs review
- Keeps memory across roles while separating each client's brief

## 限制

- No public pricing or self-serve plan; you must book a demo to get started
- The rebrand from VibeOnly to Jellyfish can be confusing when searching for the product
- Value depends on having historical recruiting data for the model to learn from
- Best suited to recruiting firms and internal talent teams, not individual job seekers

## 常見問題

### Is Jellyfish the same product as VibeOnly?
Yes. VibeOnly has been rebranded as Jellyfish, operated by Jellybrain, Inc. The site at vibeonly.ai now presents Amy, the AI sourcing agent, and the recruiter application still signs in through recruiter.vibeonly.ai.

### What does Amy actually do?
Amy handles sourcing work: she takes in a job order or call notes, structures the requirements, searches for candidates beyond LinkedIn, explains why each person fits, and can run outreach on her own once she has learned your team's preferences.

### How does the AI learn a recruiter's judgment?
It observes outcomes. Every candidate a recruiter submits, passes on, or places becomes a signal, and Amy reuses those patterns on the next search, including for a different kind of role.

### Can I control how autonomous it is?
Yes. Firms decide which steps Amy performs independently and which she must check first, and each client's requirements are tracked separately.

### Does it replace recruiters?
No. Jellyfish is positioned as decision-support: it widens the candidate pool and removes manual searching so recruiters spend their time on calls, judgment, and placements.

### How much does it cost?
Pricing is not published publicly. The starting point is a live demo arranged through the website, where commercial details are discussed directly.

### Jellyfish (VibeOnly) 的每月流量與成長趨勢為何？
Jellyfish (VibeOnly) 目前每月有 0 次造訪，月流量變化為 +0（成長率 0%）。其主要來源市場為全球（佔比 —），其中包含每月 0 次直接造訪與每月 0 次自然搜尋造訪。

### Jellyfish (VibeOnly) 是免費的嗎？其定價模式為何？
Jellyfish (VibeOnly) 採用 Demo-based / contact sales 定價模式。Jellyfish does not publish public pricing. Access starts with a live demo booked through the site, after which commercial terms are handled directly with the sales team. The legacy VibeOnly free trial is no longer advertised. 支援的帳務與結帳平台包括：未列出。

### 2026 年最佳的 Jellyfish (VibeOnly) 替代方案有哪些？
依據 OpenAITools.app 的分類流量與功能契合度，Jellyfish (VibeOnly) 的前五大替代方案為：1. Workable（每月 1078.06萬次造訪）; 2. TalentRecruit（每月 31.93萬次造訪）; 3. Kula AI（每月 49.23萬次造訪）; 4. Jack and Jill（每月 125.43萬次造訪）; 5. Juicebox (PeopleGPT)（每月 29.32萬次造訪）。

### Jellyfish (VibeOnly) 支援哪些平台與核心 AI 能力？
Jellyfish (VibeOnly) 分類於 AI 招募, AI 測試, AI 開發者工具，支援以下平台：網站，其核心能力標籤包括：AI 技能評估, 徵才平台, 人才招募, AI 熟練度, 技術能力評估, 提示詞工程。

## 替代方案

| 工具名稱 | 每月造訪次數 | 定價模式 | 比較 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| [Workable](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/workable) | 10,780,627 | 免費試用、付費 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/vibeonly-vs-workable) |
| [TalentRecruit](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/talentrecruit) | 319,337 | 需聯絡報價 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/talentrecruit-vs-vibeonly) |
| [Kula AI](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/kula-ai) | 492,326 | 付費、需聯絡報價 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/kula-ai-vs-vibeonly) |
| [Jack and Jill](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/jack-and-jill) | 1,254,267 | 免費增值、需聯絡報價 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/jack-and-jill-vs-vibeonly) |
| [Juicebox (PeopleGPT)](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/juicebox-work) | 293,157 | 付費 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/juicebox-work-vs-vibeonly) |
| [Manatal](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/manatal) | 459,004 | 免費試用、付費 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/manatal-vs-vibeonly) |
| [Humanly](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/humanly-io) | 109,717 | 需聯絡報價 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/humanly-io-vs-vibeonly) |
| [HireAI：Arc 推出的 AI 招募助手](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/hireai-ai-recruiter-by-arc) | 496,923 | 付費 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/hireai-ai-recruiter-by-arc-vs-vibeonly) |
| [Helio.AI](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/helio-ai) | 46,540 | 需聯絡報價 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/helio-ai-vs-vibeonly) |
| [TapTalent](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/taptalent) | 15,849 | 需聯絡報價 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/taptalent-vs-vibeonly) |
| [Mercor](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/mercor) | 67,221 | 需聯絡報價 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/mercor-vs-vibeonly) |
| [PyjamaHR](https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/pyjamahr) | 325,592 | 免費試用、付費、需聯絡報價 | [比較](https://openaitools.app/tw/compare/pyjamahr-vs-vibeonly) |

---
來源：https://openaitools.app/tw/tool/vibeonly