# NoteGPT vs Underleaf NoteGPT 记录了 6,166,674 月访问量，月度环比增长为 -10.6%，定价为免费增值。Underleaf 记录了 222,941 月访问量，增长率为 -1.9%，定价为免费增值。 | 指标 | [NoteGPT](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/notegpt) | [Underleaf](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/underleaf) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | 官网地址 | https://notegpt.io | https://underleaf.ai | | 分类 | AI 助手, AI 摘要工具, AI 笔记生成器 | AI Writing, AI OCR 文字识别, AI 论文生成器, AI PDF 工具 | | 定价模式 | 免费增值 | 免费增值 | | 月访问量 | 6,166,674 | 222,941 | | 月度环比增长率 | -10.6% | -1.9% | | 主要市场 | 美国 | 美国 | | 直接访问量 | 2,315,284 | 26,916 | | 评价得分 | 4.3 | 4.5 | | 收藏数 | 14 | 0 | | 支持平台 | 网站 | 网站 | ## NoteGPT NoteGPT is an AI agent that handles research, summarizing, transcription, document writing, slides, spreadsheets, and media generation for work and study. It routes tasks across several leading LLMs and delivers editable output files. **定价与套餐:** Freemium [工具详情（Markdown）](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/notegpt.md) ## Underleaf Underleaf is an AI LaTeX assistant that converts handwritten notes, photos, PDFs, Word files, and spreadsheets into clean, compilable LaTeX, and adds academic writing tools on top. **定价与套餐:** Freemium. New users get 10 free credits with no credit card required, and many single-purpose converters and generators run free in the browser. Paid plans: Essentials at $12/month ($6/month billed annually, $72/year) with 200 credits per month and up to 10 pages per PDF; Pro at $24/month ($12/month billed annually, $144/year) with 500 credits per month, all LaTeX tools, and up to 20 pages per PDF. Both include the browser extension. A Team plan for groups of 5+ adds centralized billing, an admin dashboard, and reimbursable invoices. - **Anything-to-LaTeX conversion:** Converts handwritten notes, photos and screenshots, scanned papers, Word documents, tables, and spreadsheets into LaTeX code that compiles rather than a rough approximation you must retype. - **Whole-document PDF handling:** Uploads multi-page PDFs and lets you choose which pages to convert, returning one structured document with sections, numbered equations, tables, and figures in the right places. - **Math and diagram recognition:** Reads equations, matrices, integrals, and aligned derivations at a stated 98%+ accuracy, and can turn diagrams and plots into TikZ. - **Academic writing tools:** Drafts abstracts, summaries, and thesis statements; rewrites for clarity without losing your meaning; and looks up citations with BibTeX in the same place. - **Browser extension and free tool library:** A browser extension adds rewrite, shorten, and explain actions beside your draft, while 60+ free single-purpose converters and generators run without an account. **优势:** Handles many input types — handwriting, images, PDFs, Word, and spreadsheets — through one workflow; Produces structured, compilable LaTeX rather than plain-text approximations; Multi-page PDFs come back as a single document with sections, equations, and figures placed correctly; Free tier and 60+ no-account browser tools make quality easy to test before paying **局限:** Credit-based limits mean heavy conversion work can require a paid tier quickly; Math accuracy is high but stated at 98%+, so output still needs a review pass; Team and institutional billing details are only available on request; Best experience depends on using the browser extension alongside your LaTeX editor [工具详情（Markdown）](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/underleaf.md) ## 常见问题 ### NoteGPT 和 Underleaf 在月流量上如何比较？ NoteGPT 有 6,166,674 月访问量，而 Underleaf 有 222,941。流量估算描述的是受众规模，而非产品质量。 ### 它们的增长率如何比较？ NoteGPT 的月度环比增长率为 -10.6%；Underleaf 为 -1.9%。 ### 价格如何比较？ NoteGPT: 免费增值。Freemium Underleaf: 免费增值。Freemium. New users get 10 free credits with no credit card required, and many single-purpose converters and generators run free in the browser. Paid plans: Essentials at $12/month ($6/month billed annually, $72/year) with 200 credits per month and up to 10 pages per PDF; Pro at $24/month ($12/month billed annually, $144/year) with 500 credits per month, all LaTeX tools, and up to 20 pages per PDF. Both include the browser extension. A Team plan for groups of 5+ adds centralized billing, an admin dashboard, and reimbursable invoices. ## 替代工具 | # | 工具名称 | 月访问量 | 月度环比增长率 | 定价模式 | 简介 | 工具详情（Markdown） | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | 1 | [ChatGPT](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/chatgpt-4) | 6,048,022,723 | +2.2% | 免费增值 | OpenAI 的旗舰多模态助手，由 GPT-6 和 GPT-5.6 驱动，适用于推理、编程和深度研究。 | [.md](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/chatgpt-4.md) | | 2 | [DeepSeek](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/deepseek) | 372,761,591 | +4.3% | 免费增值 | 由 DeepSeek-V4 与 R1 驱动的高效开源权重与托管推理 AI，token 成本极低。 | [.md](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/deepseek.md) | | 3 | [Otter AI](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/otter-ai) | 7,360,981 | +9.6% | 免费增值 | 拥有更强大的自动会议逐字稿与语音搜索功能，但缺乏 NoteGPT 的演示与文档生成功能。},{de: | [.md](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/otter-ai.md) | | 4 | [Fathom](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/fathom-2-0) | 5,620,385 | +0.2% | 免费增值，免费试用 | 具备出色的视频通话录制与摘要功能，但主要是针对会议而非一般视频内容。},{de: | [.md](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/fathom-2-0.md) | | 5 | [Knowt](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/knowt-com) | 4,183,953 | +5.4% | 免费 | Free flashcard and study material creation from notes, but lacks video transcription and slide building tools. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/knowt-com.md) | | 6 | [PDFgear](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/pdfgear) | 2,845,280 | -3.4% | 免费 | 面向所有设备的免费 AI PDF 编辑器 | [.md](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/pdfgear.md) | | 7 | [Notta](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/notta) | 2,585,354 | +2% | 免费增值，付费，定价请咨询 | 具备更好的实时音频与会议逐字稿工作流程，但较少聚焦于一般网络视频摘要。},{de: | [.md](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/notta.md) | | 8 | [tl;dv](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/tldv-io) | 1,396,729 | +1.9% | 免费增值 | 强大的视频会议逐字稿与 CRM 自动化功能，但较少聚焦于学生的学习笔记与幻灯片。},{de: | [.md](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/tldv-io.md) | | 9 | [SlideSpeak](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/slidespeak) | 867,537 | +23.1% | 免费增值，定价请咨询 | 将文档变成可编辑 PowerPoint 的 AI 演示文稿工具 | [.md](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/slidespeak.md) | | 10 | [Mindgrasp](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/mindgrasp) | 672,288 | -0.5% | 免费增值，免费试用 | 更侧重于学习教材与课程笔记，但缺乏 NoteGPT 那种丰富的视频与幻灯片生成工具。 | [.md](https://openaitools.app/zh/tool/mindgrasp.md) | --- 来源：https://openaitools.app/zh/compare/notegpt-vs-underleaf 更多 Markdown 页面: [分类](https://openaitools.app/zh/categories.md) · [流量排名](https://openaitools.app/zh/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/zh/llms.txt)