0xmd records 128,262 monthly visits with -2.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% growth and Freemium pricing.
Generative AI for medical and everyday health questions
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | 0xmd.com | consensus.app |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 128.26K (128,262) | 6.01M (6,014,388) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -2.86K (-2.2%) | -71.39K (-1.2%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇭🇰 Hong Kong SAR China (67.7%) | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 60.84K | 2.92M |
| User Rating | 4.1 | 4.7 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
Generative AI for medical and everyday health questions
Language models trained on healthcare and medical literature, designed to understand, generate and reason over clinical content rather than general trivia.
Upload lab reports, imaging results, photos or documents and have the system explain what the contents typically mean in everyday language.
Describe how you feel or paste in results to get organized, readable context on possible interpretations and topics worth raising with a clinician.
Ask questions and read explanations in more than fifty languages, which helps users who are reading medical material in a second language.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Free AI symptom checker developed by doctors
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
AI health guidance with licensed doctors on demand
AI health guidance with licensed doctors on demand
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
AI scribe and front desk that give independent clinics their time back
AI scribe and front desk that give independent clinics their time back
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
