Executive Telemetry Verdict (BLUF)In our 2026 telemetry benchmark, DeepSeek leads total web traffic with 357.40M monthly visits (357,399,386) versus ANDRE at 3.5K (3,538)—representing 101017.4x volume and a difference of 357.40M visits per month. For month-over-month momentum, ANDRE leads growth velocity at +3.3% (+112 visits/mo) compared with DeepSeek at +1.0%. Pricing compares ANDRE (Freemium) against DeepSeek (Freemium), with primary geographic demand led by United States (100.0%) for ANDRE and China (50.5%) for DeepSeek.

AI-powered survey data analysis automation for insights and reports.
Verified 2026 monthly traffic volume, acquisition channels, pricing structure, and ecosystem footprint
| Dimension / Metric | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | andre.ai | deepseek.com |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing Details | Freemium | Kostenlose Web- und Mobile-Chat-App unter chat.deepseek.com; nutzungsbasierte OpenAI-kompatible API mit Nebenzeittarifen von $0.15/1M Input-Token ($0.003 bei Cache-Hit) und $0.60/1M Output-Token für deepseek-flash (V4.1-Flash) sowie $0.66/1M Input ($0.022 bei Cache-Hit) und $1.98/1M Output für deepseek-v4-pro (wochentags zu UTC-Spitzenzeiten gilt der doppelte Preis). |
| Monthly Web Visits | 3.5K3,538 visits/mo | 357.40M357,399,386 visits/mo |
| MoM Traffic Delta | +112112 visits delta | +3.60M3,597,280 visits delta |
| MoM Growth Velocity (%) | +3.3% | +1.0% |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States(100.0% share) | 🇨🇳 China(50.5% share) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 1.4K(1,388) | 280.06M(280,059,676) |
| Referral Visits / mo | 368(368) | 10.57M(10,570,000) |
| Email Visits / mo | 131(131) | 2.21M(2,211,842) |
| User Rating | 5.0 / 5.0(83 reviews) | 3.8 / 5.0(68 reviews) |
| Bookmarks | 1 saves | 44 saves |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
| Chrome Extension Installs | — | — |
| Discord Community Members | 7 members | — |
| Primary Categories |

AI-powered survey data analysis automation for insights and reports.
AI-powered survey data analysis automation for insights and reports.

Hocheffiziente Open-Weight- und gehostete Reasoning-KI auf Basis von DeepSeek-V4 und R1 zu extrem niedrigen Token-Preisen.
Leverages a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture (49B active parameters out of 1.6T on V4-Pro) to process up to 1 million tokens with minimal latency and memory overhead.
Pioneered by DeepSeek-R1 and integrated into V3.2 and V4 thinking modes, exposing step-by-step self-verification for complex math, logic, and code debugging.
Drops input token costs to $0.003/1M on Flash and $0.022/1M on V4-Pro for cache hits, with 50% lower rates during off-peak UTC hours.
Provides free access at chat.deepseek.com and on iOS/Android with document uploads, reasoning mode, and web search without paywalling core models.
DeepSeek generates more monthly web traffic with 357.40M visits/mo (357,399,386) compared to ANDRE with 3.5K visits/mo (3,538), giving DeepSeek 101017.35x the monthly reach (357.40M additional visits). Across acquisition channels, ANDRE records 1.4K direct visits, 368 referral visits, and 131 email visits per month, while DeepSeek records 280.06M direct visits, 10.57M referral visits, and 2.21M email visits per month.
ANDRE is growing faster on a month-over-month velocity basis in 2026. ANDRE posted a MoM growth velocity of +3.3% with a monthly traffic delta of +112 visits (112), whereas DeepSeek posted a MoM growth velocity of +1.0% with a delta of +3.60M visits (3,597,280). Regionally, ANDRE's top market is United States (100.0% share) and DeepSeek's top market is China (50.5% share).
ANDRE operates on a Freemium pricing model (supported on Website), while DeepSeek operates on a Freemium model (Kostenlose Web- und Mobile-Chat-App unter chat.deepseek.com; nutzungsbasierte OpenAI-kompatible API mit Nebenzeittarifen von $0.15/1M Input-Token ($0.003 bei Cache-Hit) und $0.60/1M Output-Token für deepseek-flash (V4.1-Flash) sowie $0.66/1M Input ($0.022 bei Cache-Hit) und $1.98/1M Output für deepseek-v4-pro (wochentags zu UTC-Spitzenzeiten gilt der doppelte Preis).). In user satisfaction and community adoption, ANDRE has 1 directory bookmarks and a 5.0/5.0 user rating, compared to 44 bookmarks and a 3.8/5.0 user rating for DeepSeek.
Based on category overlap and verified 2026 monthly traffic telemetry, the top alternatives to both ANDRE and DeepSeek include ChatGPT (5.92B visits/mo, Freemium), Google Gemini (2.64B visits/mo, Freemium), Claude (1.01B visits/mo, Freemium), Grok (205.46M visits/mo, Freemium), Hostinger AI Website Builder & Hosting (52.47M visits/mo, Paid). Teams evaluating ANDRE vs DeepSeek frequently benchmark these competitors for pricing flexibility, platform support, and workflow integration.
Explore deep-dive profiles, verified alternative hubs, and related head-to-head matchups
Top competing AI tools ranked by verified monthly web traffic and category overlap
Studocu is a platform for students to share and access study materials globally.
A universal AI assistant that turns ideas into action.
Hyper-personalized astrology & horoscope app with AI and expert astrologer guidance.