Avey records 446 monthly visits with -93% month-over-month growth and Contact for Pricing pricing. Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% growth and Freemium pricing.
A medicine-native health intelligence layer for people, clinicians and enterprises
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | avey.ai | consensus.app |
| Pricing Model | Contact for Pricing | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 446 (446) | 6.01M (6,014,388) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -5.96K (-93%) | -71.39K (-1.2%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🌐 Global (—) | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 173 | 2.92M |
| User Rating | 4.2 | 4.7 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
A medicine-native health intelligence layer for people, clinicians and enterprises
A foundation model trained specifically on medical knowledge rather than a general model with a medical wrapper.
A conversational assistant for consumers and professionals, covering health questions, clinical reasoning practice and practical medical tasks.
Developer access to bring Avey's health-native model into third-party products and workflows via APIs.
Clinical decision support, automated documentation and medical coding aimed at reducing physician burden and improving revenue capture.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Free AI symptom checker developed by doctors
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
AI health guidance with licensed doctors on demand
AI health guidance with licensed doctors on demand
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
