How do their growth rates compare?

Binarly has a month-over-month growth rate of -23.7%; CodeThreat has -70.5%.

How does pricing compare?

Binarly: Contact for Pricing. Enterprise, contact-for-pricing. There is no published self-service plan; interested buyers typically request a demo or talk to sales to scope a deployment. CodeThreat: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with a published entry price: Free plan at $0/month (3 private repositories, limited agentic PR review and false-positive elimination, SAST + SCA), Pro at $39 per contributor per month adding RBAC, secret scanning, infrastructure security, Jira integration and vulnerability reporting/exports, and Enterprise pricing on request for on-prem deployment, SLA support, compliance reporting and private LLM hosting.

What are alternatives to Binarly and CodeThreat?

Other tools in related categories include Cursor, CodeRabbit, Aikido Security, Augment Code, Mindgard.

Binarly vs CodeThreat — Traffic (5.81K vs 674), Pricing & Verdict

Open AI Tools

Binarly vs CodeThreat — Traffic (5.81K vs 674), Pricing & Verdict | Open AI Tools

Side-by-Side Traffic & Specification Matrix

Dimension / Metric	Binarly	CodeThreat
Official Domain	binarly.io	codethreat.com
Pricing Model	Contact for Pricing	Freemium, Contact for Pricing
Monthly Visits	5.81K (5,805)	674 (674)
MoM Traffic Delta	-1.8K (-23.7%)	-1.61K (-70.5%)
Primary Market & Share	🇺🇸 United States (69.9%)	🇧🇷 Brazil (76.3%)
Direct Visits / mo	2.28K	279
User Rating	4.3	4.4
Supported Platforms	Website	Website

Binarly

Binary-level security for the software and firmware you ship

Binary and firmware inspection

Analyses the compiled artifacts and firmware images that actually ship, rather than relying on source manifests or vendor claims.

Supply chain and tampering detection

Identifies unexpected components, unauthorised modifications, embedded secrets and signs of build tampering across products.

SBOM and CBOM validation

Verifies that declared software and cryptography bills of materials match the real contents of the shipped binary.

Exploitability-based prioritisation

Ranks issues using reachability and live exploitation signals so teams can triage effectively instead of chasing raw severity scores.

Strengths & Pros

+Grounded in shipped artifacts, so findings reflect what customers actually run
+Covers firmware, where many source-based scanners have limited reach
+Exploitability signals reduce alert fatigue compared with raw CVE counts
+Contributions to firmware vulnerability research are widely respected in the field