Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. ContextClue records 1,643 monthly visits with +58.9% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Turn dense documents into clear, citable answers
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | context-clue.com |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 1.64K (1,643) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | +609 (+58.9%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🇮🇳 India (68.5%) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 646 |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.1 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
Turn dense documents into clear, citable answers
Ask questions in plain language across a connected document set and get direct answers instead of a raw list of links.
Answers are grounded in retrieved passages from your own documents, and references point back to the original text for verification.
Condense long reports, research papers, or contract bundles into short, readable digests that keep the essential points.
Turn findings from multiple sources into structured, shareable reports and generated documents.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Enterprise AI grounded in your company's own knowledge
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Free / Open-sourceChat with any PDF, video, or website and get cited answers in seconds
Free / Open-sourceTencent's AI knowledge steward for searching, reading, writing, and managing your own knowledge base.
Free / Open-sourceTencent's AI knowledge steward for searching, reading, writing, and managing your own knowledge base.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
