Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Curiosity records 9,655 monthly visits with -44.5% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Describe the internal tool you need — get working enterprise software
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | curiosity.ai |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 9.66K (9,655) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | -7.74K (-44.5%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🇺🇸 United States (48.5%) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 3.83K |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.2 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
Describe the internal tool you need — get working enterprise software
Describe an internal tool in plain language and receive a running application, dashboard, or agent rather than a mockup.
Tools are built on connected company records, so answers trace back to the specific source instead of being guessed.
Generated tools cannot reveal anything the underlying source systems would not already allow that user to see.
Runs on premises or in your own private cloud, in the region you choose, with your own choice of model.
Free / Open-sourceReal-time AI answer engine and research workspace combining live web citations with frontier reasoning models.
Free / Open-sourceReal-time AI answer engine and research workspace combining live web citations with frontier reasoning models.
Free / Open-sourceBuild working apps, websites, and AI agents by describing them
Free / Open-sourceBuild working apps, websites, and AI agents by describing them
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Free / Open-sourceA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Enterprise AI grounded in your company's own knowledge
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
