Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Deeplomacy records 1,073 monthly visits with +84.1% growth and Free pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
An interactive, browser-based look at diplomacy through the lens of artificial intelligence.
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | deeplomacy.net |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 1.07K (1,073) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | +490 (+84.1%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🇺🇸 United States (100%) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 319 |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.1 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
An interactive, browser-based look at diplomacy through the lens of artificial intelligence.
Frames foreign policy and negotiation as a problem AI can reason about, then lets you see the results unfold.
Explore how models handle alliances, bargaining and conflict rather than only reading about it in a paper.
The whole project lives at a single web address and runs in the browser, so there is nothing to download or install.
Sits at the intersection of large language models and political science, useful for anyone curious about AI reasoning in a high-stakes domain.
Free / Open-sourceHigh-efficiency open-weight and hosted reasoning AI powered by DeepSeek-V4 and R1 at ultra-low token costs.
Free / Open-sourceHigh-efficiency open-weight and hosted reasoning AI powered by DeepSeek-V4 and R1 at ultra-low token costs.
Real-time AI answer engine and research workspace combining live web citations with frontier reasoning models.
Real-time AI answer engine and research workspace combining live web citations with frontier reasoning models.
Free / Open-sourceRun and build with open AI models locally or in the cloud
Free / Open-sourceRun and build with open AI models locally or in the cloud
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Computational knowledge engine for expert answers
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
