Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. FileAI records 5,565 monthly visits with +49.5% growth and Freemium pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask your documents questions and see where every answer came from
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | fileai.pro |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 5.57K (5,565) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | +1.84K (+49.5%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🇺🇸 United States (62.9%) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 2.21K |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.1 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
Ask your documents questions and see where every answer came from
Every answer comes with numbered citations; click one and the PDF opens at the passage, highlighted on the page.
Responses are drawn from your uploaded file rather than the open web or a model's memory, so you can verify every claim.
Handles contracts, leases, insurance policies, staff handbooks, research papers, tender packs and lecture slides.
If the document does not address the question, FileAI tells you instead of inventing an answer.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
A free, AI-powered PDF editor for every device
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Cross-platform PDF editing with GPT-powered AI for reading, translating, and signing documents
Chat with any PDF, video, or website and get cited answers in seconds
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
