Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Flowith records 324,679 monthly visits with -27.3% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
An agentic AI workspace built as a canvas for deep work
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | flowith.io |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 324.68K (324,679) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | -122.17K (-27.3%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🇨🇳 China (24.1%) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 171.17K |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.4 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
An agentic AI workspace built as a canvas for deep work
Arrange prompts, outputs and agent runs as connected nodes on an infinite canvas, so complex projects stay navigable instead of scrolling off screen.
Access several leading language models in one interface and switch between them per task or compare their answers side by side.
Delegate multi-step goals to an agent that plans, gathers information and produces deliverables with minimal back-and-forth.
Save notes, references and generated artifacts into a persistent knowledge space you can search and reuse in future sessions.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
Delivers world-class collaborative whiteboarding and brainstorming tools, but lacks native multi-model chat assistants and autonomous agent workflows.
Delivers world-class collaborative whiteboarding and brainstorming tools, but lacks native multi-model chat assistants and autonomous agent workflows.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
SpecialistAn all-in-one AI super assistant for professionals and enterprises
SpecialistAn all-in-one AI super assistant for professionals and enterprises
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Offers collaborative visual canvases and AI diagram generators, but lacks multi-model chat and autonomous agent execution.
Offers collaborative visual canvases and AI diagram generators, but lacks multi-model chat and autonomous agent execution.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
