Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. genei records 23,178 monthly visits with +1.2% growth and Freemium, Free Trial pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
AI summarisation, keyword extraction and research for long documents
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | genei.io |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium, Free Trial |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 23.18K (23,178) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | +275 (+1.2%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🇺🇸 United States (15.4%) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 9.27K |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
AI summarisation, keyword extraction and research for long documents
Import documents or pages and get condensed summaries to finish a reading list faster.
Pull out the key terms and topics in a document set to understand it at a glance.
Store documents in customisable projects and folders, and link content to any part of a document.
Built-in citation management and a reference generator, with export functionality to move research into a draft.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
Moonshot AI's long-context assistant for research, coding, and agentic work
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
AI research platform for reading, understanding and writing scientific papers
AI research platform for reading, understanding and writing scientific papers
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Chat with any PDF, video, or website and get cited answers in seconds
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
