Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Glasp records 889,564 monthly visits with -14.1% growth and Freemium pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Highlight the web, learn in public, and build your AI clone
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | glasp.co |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 889.56K (889,564) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | -146.38K (-14.1%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🇺🇸 United States (15.5%) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 400.6K |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.2 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
Highlight the web, learn in public, and build your AI clone
Mark up passages on any website or lines in a YouTube transcript from a browser extension, then keep them in one searchable library.
Highlights are shared publicly by default, so you can follow other users, react to their picks and discover sources through people with similar interests.
Generate summaries of long articles, PDFs and YouTube videos to judge relevance fast and to digest what you have already saved.
Trained on your accumulated highlights and notes, the AI clone answers in the shape of your reading history and areas of interest.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where teams and agents get work done together
SpecialistReal-time AI answer engine and research workspace combining live web citations with frontier reasoning models.
SpecialistReal-time AI answer engine and research workspace combining live web citations with frontier reasoning models.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistExcels at deep scientific literature reading and analysis, whereas Glasp targets general web and video content curation.
SpecialistExcels at deep scientific literature reading and analysis, whereas Glasp targets general web and video content curation.
Offers a broader multi-model sidebar for quick page summarization, but lacks Glasp's community-driven public highlighting and curation.
Offers a broader multi-model sidebar for quick page summarization, but lacks Glasp's community-driven public highlighting and curation.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
Provides faster multi-tab AI assistance and article summaries, but lacks dedicated social knowledge curation and note archiving features.
Provides faster multi-tab AI assistance and article summaries, but lacks dedicated social knowledge curation and note archiving features.
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
