Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Miros records 1,899 monthly visits with -13.7% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
AI that knows what shoppers want — without asking them
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | miros.ai |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 1.9K (1,899) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | -301 (-13.7%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom (93.7%) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 748 |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.3 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
AI that knows what shoppers want — without asking them
Miros reads scroll velocity, clicks, dwell time and ignored items to build a real-time preference profile for each visitor, without asking them to describe what they want.
The AI extracts thousands of visual and semantic attributes per product image, so catalogues do not need manual tagging to work with the platform.
Contradictory signals are synthesised into a coherent profile that then powers search, browse, recommendations and shop-the-look together.
A single visual layer for ecommerce that lets shoppers discover products through images and behaviour rather than typed keywords.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Free / Open-sourceYour agentic AI business team for global e-commerce and sourcing
Free / Open-sourceYour agentic AI business team for global e-commerce and sourcing
Conversational AI and helpdesk built for ecommerce brands
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
