SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
#1Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. note.md records 0 monthly visits with -100% growth and Freemium pricing.
note.md — Reading Studio
| Dimension / Metric | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | notemd.org |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 0 (0) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) |
| -2.13K (-100%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🌐 Global (—) |
|---|
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 0 |
|---|
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.2 |
|---|
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
|---|

AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
note.md — Reading Studio
A side-by-side dual-pane reader that puts the PDF and your markdown editor next to each other, so highlights and annotations become part of your notes as you read.
Generate BibTeX or APA citations from PDF metadata, with every citation linked back to the exact highlight it came from so you can return to the passage months later.
A premium feature that searches your library by meaning rather than exact keywords, powered by on-device models so nothing is uploaded.
Bidirectional links between notes and sources build a visual relationship graph that can be exported in a Neo4j-friendly format.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
#1
A free, AI-powered academic search engine for 240M+ papers across every scientific field


SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
#3
AI research platform for reading, understanding and writing scientific papers
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
AI answers grounded in 300M+ scholarly full texts

Map the literature around the papers you love—free
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
AI-native workspace for literature reviews and auditable systematic reviews
AI-powered platform to read, write, and stay current with research
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
A free, AI-powered academic search engine for 240M+ papers across every scientific field
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
AI research platform for reading, understanding and writing scientific papers
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
AI answers grounded in 300M+ scholarly full texts
Map the literature around the papers you love—free
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
AI-native workspace for literature reviews and auditable systematic reviews