Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Otio records 0 monthly visits with — growth and Freemium pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Save the web, then chat, summarise and write from your sources
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | chromewebstore.google.com |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 0 (0) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | 0 (—) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🌐 Global (—) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 0 |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.5 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Browser Extension |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
Save the web, then chat, summarise and write from your sources
A floating save button plus Cmd/Ctrl+Shift+S captures pages, PDFs, videos and tweets, with native-style buttons injected on YouTube, X, Substack and Medium.
Cmd/Ctrl+Shift+K searches every saved link, PDF, tweet and video without leaving the page; Shift+R surfaces similar items in your library.
Ask questions across an entire project and get answers that point to the exact page and passage, so you can verify in one click.
Compare or switch between leading AI models with dual chat instead of stacking several subscriptions.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistAI research platform for reading, understanding and writing scientific papers
SpecialistAI research platform for reading, understanding and writing scientific papers
AI sidebar and browser agent for reading, writing and research
AI sidebar and browser agent for reading, writing and research
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
One-click AI assistant for browsing, writing and research
One-click AI assistant for browsing, writing and research
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Highlight the web, learn in public, and build your AI clone
Highlight the web, learn in public, and build your AI clone
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
