SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
#1Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. OutlierDB records 16,622 monthly visits with +34.4% growth and Freemium pricing.
AI-powered Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu match analysis and training database
| Dimension / Metric | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | outlierdb.com |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 16.62K (16,622) |
| MoM Traffic Delta |
| -71.39K (-1.2%) |
| +4.26K (+34.4%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🇺🇸 United States (75.4%) |
|---|
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 9.3K |
|---|
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4 |
|---|
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
|---|

AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
AI-powered Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu match analysis and training database
Describe the position, submission or concept you want to study and surface relevant matches and breakdowns instead of scrolling through footage.
Full matches from major BJJ and grappling events are indexed and organized so you can study real high-level exchanges.
Techniques and chains are grouped into sequences, helping you follow how positions connect rather than viewing isolated moves.
Breakdowns and instructional resources from recognized coaches and grapplers sit alongside the match library, including exclusive material.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
#1
A free, AI-powered academic search engine for 240M+ papers across every scientific field


Record, stream and analyse every match automatically

A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users

Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.

SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
Includes integrated reference management and systematic review tools, but has a narrower academic database coverage.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
A free, AI-powered academic search engine for 240M+ papers across every scientific field
A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
Includes integrated reference management and systematic review tools, but has a narrower academic database coverage.