Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Pinster AI records 0 monthly visits with — growth and Freemium pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Save anything, and let AI tag, summarise and let you chat with it.
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | apps.apple.com |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 0 (0) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | 0 (—) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🌐 Global (—) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 0 |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.4 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | App |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
Save anything, and let AI tag, summarise and let you chat with it.
When you save a link, document or image, Pinster analyses it and proposes folders and tags based on your existing categories.
Web pages, PDFs and articles are summarised so you can skim the key ideas without re-reading everything.
Ask questions and get answers drawn from your library of saved links and documents.
Scheduled daily, weekly or monthly wrap-ups of what you saved, available as text and as audio you can listen to.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
AI research platform for reading, understanding and writing scientific papers
AI research platform for reading, understanding and writing scientific papers
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Free AI-powered PDF editor, converter and reader for every device
Free AI-powered PDF editor, converter and reader for every device
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
All-in-one online PDF editor with AI helpers for reading, summarizing, and generating documents
All-in-one online PDF editor with AI helpers for reading, summarizing, and generating documents
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Chat with any PDF, video, or website and get cited answers in seconds
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
