Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Process Street records 226,993 monthly visits with +17.8% growth and Free Trial, Contact for Pricing pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Turn policies into AI-enforced workflows you can prove
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | process.st |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 226.99K (226,993) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | +34.31K (+17.8%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🇺🇸 United States (56.1%) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 150.68K |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.3 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
Turn policies into AI-enforced workflows you can prove
Centralise policies and SOPs with version control and governance mapped to frameworks such as ISO 9001, SOC 2, SOX and FDA requirements.
Turn policies into structured workflows with owners, due dates, conditional logic and approvals, so every step is followed rather than assumed.
Monitors regulatory changes, automates the associated work and flags risks and gaps before they turn into audit findings.
Records who completed each step and when, with required file uploads, form entries and approvals attached to the task.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistConnects thousands of apps for complex automated pipelines, but lacks built-in structured checklists and SOP document management.
SpecialistConnects thousands of apps for complex automated pipelines, but lacks built-in structured checklists and SOP document management.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Free / Open-sourcePowerful open-source workflow automation with visual node building, though less tailored specifically to document-based SOP checklists.
Free / Open-sourcePowerful open-source workflow automation with visual node building, though less tailored specifically to document-based SOP checklists.
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
