Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. QWIP - Consult AI Experts records 0 monthly visits with — growth and Freemium pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Instant AI consultations with doctor, lawyer, chef and tradesperson personas
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | apps.apple.com |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 0 (0) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | 0 (—) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🌐 Global (—) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 0 |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 3.5 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | App |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
Instant AI consultations with doctor, lawyer, chef and tradesperson personas
Choose from built-in personas such as doctor, veterinarian, dentist, lawyer, chef, plumber and electrician before you ask your question, so the reply is framed around that domain.
Every user gets three messages per day at no cost, making it easy to try different expert categories before paying anything.
A one-time in-app purchase priced at $1.99 on the App Store opens up unlimited conversations.
The app is under 5 MB and runs on iPhone, iPad, Mac with Apple M1 or later, and Apple Vision, requiring iOS 16.0 or above.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Chat with 30+ leading AI models in one clean, fast workspace
Chat with 30+ leading AI models in one clean, fast workspace
Free AI tarot readings with conversational follow-ups and seven distinct reader personas
Free AI tarot readings with conversational follow-ups and seven distinct reader personas
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
AI health guidance with licensed doctors on demand
AI health guidance with licensed doctors on demand
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
