Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. ReadPaper Importer records 0 monthly visits with — growth and Free pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Save academic PDFs to your ReadPaper library straight from the browser
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | chromewebstore.google.com |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 0 (0) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | 0 (—) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🌐 Global (—) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 0 |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.5 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Browser Extension |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
Save academic PDFs to your ReadPaper library straight from the browser
The extension senses PDF files as you browse journals, preprint servers and course pages, and imports them to your ReadPaper account with a single click.
Every imported paper lands in a library you can sort into folders and tag, so related work stays grouped and easy to find again.
Read papers inside an AI-assisted reader that is designed to speed up comprehension of dense academic text.
Structured metadata and knowledge-graph search help you explore papers across fields and follow connections between them.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
A free, AI-powered academic search engine for 240M+ papers across every scientific field
A free, AI-powered academic search engine for 240M+ papers across every scientific field
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
AI research platform for reading, understanding and writing scientific papers
AI research platform for reading, understanding and writing scientific papers
AI sidebar and browser agent for reading, writing and research
AI sidebar and browser agent for reading, writing and research
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Highlight the web, learn in public, and build your AI clone
Highlight the web, learn in public, and build your AI clone
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Map the literature around the papers you love—free
Map the literature around the papers you love—free
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
