Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Suprmind records 111,310 monthly visits with -23.5% growth and Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Five frontier AIs debate your question, you get the verdict
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | suprmind.ai |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 111.31K (111,310) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | -34.28K (-23.5%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🇺🇸 United States (12.4%) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 21.12K |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.2 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
Five frontier AIs debate your question, you get the verdict
GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and Perplexity respond in the same conversation, each reading what came before instead of answering in isolation.
When models contradict each other, the conflict is surfaced and indexed rather than averaged away, so you see both sides before deciding.
Sequential, Super Mind, Debate, Red Team, First Principles, Research and Symphony modes let you tune how much scrutiny a question gets.
Convert a finished conversation into a decision brief, SWOT, strategy extract or research paper with 25+ templates and Markdown, PDF or DOCX export.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Chat with 30+ leading AI models in one clean, fast workspace
Chat with 30+ leading AI models in one clean, fast workspace
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
Chat with Japan's frontier models, one interface
