Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. taggingBox records 0 monthly visits with — growth and Freemium pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Save web content into boxes and organize it with AI-recommended tags
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | chromewebstore.google.com |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 0 (0) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | 0 (—) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🌐 Global (—) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 0 |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.3 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Browser Extension |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
Save web content into boxes and organize it with AI-recommended tags
Drag any sentence from an article, blog, or document and it is saved instantly into the box you choose, keeping related material together.
The combined GPT-4 API and proprietary algorithm proposes tags matched to the context of each saved snippet.
The extension is built to work on both Korean and English web pages, so mixed-language research stays in one system.
Find saved material by tag instead of hunting through browser bookmarks or a long uncategorized list.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
One-click AI assistant for browsing, writing and research
One-click AI assistant for browsing, writing and research
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Highlight the web, learn in public, and build your AI clone
Highlight the web, learn in public, and build your AI clone
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
