Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Uxia records 14,746 monthly visits with -41.8% growth and Freemium pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Validate UX in minutes with synthetic and human testers in one platform.
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | uxia.app |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 14.75K (14,746) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | -10.58K (-41.8%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🇺🇸 United States (33.9%) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 5.94K |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
Validate UX in minutes with synthetic and human testers in one platform.
Define demographic, geographic, and psychological criteria using 15+ filters backed by public databases, then enrich AI testers with your own personas, past interviews, and terminology.
Recruit from 14M+ human participants or invite your own users to run unmoderated usability tests and interviews when you want to validate synthetic findings.
The AI moderator builds discussion guides, decides follow-up questions, runs hundreds of sessions at once, and reports in 90+ languages.
Combine tasks, surveys, card sorting, and accessibility checks into one flow, testing Figma prototypes, AI-built apps, static designs, or live websites that require logins.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
A searchable library of 145,000+ real web and iOS screens for UI/UX inspiration.
A searchable library of 145,000+ real web and iOS screens for UI/UX inspiration.
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
From idea or sketch to editable wireframes, hi-fi UI and code in minutes
From idea or sketch to editable wireframes, hi-fi UI and code in minutes
