Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Visual Field Test records 0 monthly visits with 0% growth and Free pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Map blind spots and peripheral vision at home, in about five minutes per eye
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | visualfieldtest.com |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 0 (0) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | 0 (0%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🌐 Global (—) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 0 |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.4 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
Map blind spots and peripheral vision at home, in about five minutes per eye
A guided routine walks you through covering one eye, fixing on a central cross and pressing space or clicking whenever a light flash appears, taking about five minutes per eye.
Simple mode screens your field quickly, while Advanced mode measures threshold sensitivity in decibels and reports Mean Deviation and Pattern Standard Deviation.
Every result arrives with a colour-coded map of seen versus missed points, a score, duration and response-consistency checks, plus a plain-language AI explanation.
Tests are saved automatically and charted as per-eye consistency trends, with side-by-side comparison that highlights newly missed or recovered points and overall change.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation.
Free AI symptom checker developed by doctors
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
AI health guidance with licensed doctors on demand
AI health guidance with licensed doctors on demand
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
SpecialistAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistExcellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
SpecialistVisualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis.
