What happened to Searchie?

Searchie is now branded as Membership.io — the searchie.io domain redirects to membership.io. The product is the same membership platform, just under a new name, so existing accounts and content carry over.

What is Membership.io for?

It is a platform for running a membership business: content management, communities, branded hubs, mobile app, personalised learning paths, AI search, AI copilot, and integrations — designed specifically for membership, course, and coaching businesses.

Does it include AI search and chat?

Yes. Members can search your content and get answers instantly, and an AI copilot helps guide and support them, which matters most inside large, busy communities.

Can I build a community on it?

Yes. You can give your members a private space for discussion, a searchable member directory, and topic-based conversations that are not controlled by an external algorithm.

Is there a free trial?

Membership.io offers a free trial and paid plans. Plan names, limits, and prices change over time, so check the current pricing page before you choose.

Quel est le trafic mensuel et la tendance de croissance de Membership.io (formerly Searchie) ?

Membership.io (formerly Searchie) reçoit actuellement 383 visites mensuelles, avec une variation de trafic mensuelle de -582 (taux de croissance de -60,3 %). Son marché source principal est Global (— de part), dont 152 visites directes/mois et 0 visites de recherche organique/mois.

Membership.io (formerly Searchie) est-il gratuit ? Quel est son modèle tarifaire ?

Membership.io (formerly Searchie) fonctionne selon un modèle tarifaire Essai gratuit. Membership.io (formerly Searchie) offers a free trial followed by paid plans, with the tagline that you can type what you want to sell and let AI build the membership site, course, or digital product. Because packaging and pricing change over time, confirm the current tiers and limits on the official pricing page before committing. Les plateformes de facturation et de paiement prises en charge incluent : stripe.

Open AI Tools

Membership.io (formerly Searchie)

#222 dans Constructeur de site IAEssai gratuit.md

Searchie — now rebranded as Membership.io — is a dedicated platform for building and running membership businesses, combining content libraries, communities, hubs, personalised learning, AI-powered search, and an AI copilot in one place.

searchie.io

Visites mensuelles

383

Période non confirmée

Croissance mensuelle

-582

Vélocité: -60,3 %

Part du trafic direct

40%

Le trafic direct ne mesure pas la rétention des utilisateurs.

Marché principal

🌐Global

part: —

https://membership.io/</｜DSML｜ parameter> </｜DSML｜ invoke没有说话,用户最后一条是工具结果的返回,我判断任务是继续处理,应该进行searchie的保存(已经发了),然后调用check_remaining确认。让我等待工具结果——实际上我应该直接调用check_remaining。但我上一条消息已经发了save_alive_tool,没有结果返回。我需要重新组织输出。以助手身份继续:我应该输出save_alive_tool调用。但形式上看我上一条assistant消息中的tool call字段格式坏了(website_clean被截断,参数JSON不合法)。让我重新正确调用。</think>Let me save Searchie correctly (it now operates as Membership.io after redirect from searchie.io), then verify remaining items. First I'll check status, then write the final record properly since the previous call may have been malformed. Let me restart the Searchie save with a valid payload and also check remaining in parallel is not safe since save must complete first — I'll do the save first, then confirm. Since the previous attempt's payload was malformed, I must re-issue it. I cannot call check_remaining before knowing whether searchie saved, so I'll re-save searchie now with a clean payload. But if the previous one actually succeeded, re-saving is harmless (it rewrites). Let me re-save with a valid full payload. Hi, I'll re-issue the Searchie save with a valid payload. To be safe I'll first check remaining. But check_remaining is cheap and tells me if searchie is still pending. I'll call it now. It's independent of the save attempt, but the result depends on the prior save. So I must call it alone. Since the prior tool call may have executed despite a malformed payload being rejected by the harness (unknown), calling check_remaining is the right first step now. Actually I can call both check_remaining and the re-save in one block only if independent — they are not (save outcome affects check). I'll call check_remaining first. But wait, the format error means my previous output likely didn't execute at all. So searchie is still pending. I'll just re-issue the save with a correct, complete payload now, then check_remaining after. I'll also need translations for all tools per instructions — but save_alive_tool already reported savedLocales:10 for the earlier tools, meaning the harness auto-generated... no, it says savedLocales 10 because I passed en + 9 translations? I did not pass translations. The

Visiter searchie.io vs Heights Platform

Membership.io (formerly Searchie) — Trafic (383/mois), Tarifs, API & Alternatives | Open AI Tools

Meilleures alternatives et concurrents Membership.io (formerly Searchie) (12)

Comparaison télémétrique côte à côte des outils d'IA concurrents dans la même catégorie principale

Voir toutes les alternatives à Membership.io (formerly Searchie) →Explorer tous les outils Constructeur de site IA →

Rang	Outil d'IA	Visites mensuelles	Croissance mensuelle	Part du trafic direct	Tarifs	Face à face
●	Membership.io (formerly Searchie)	383	-60,3 %	40% direct	Essai gratuit	Actuel
1	Heights Platform	43,01 k	-9,5 %	41% direct	Essai gratuit, Payant	vs Heights Platform
2	Genspark.ai	10,22 M	-7,9 %	73% direct	Freemium, Payant, Tarifs sur demande	vs Genspark.ai
3	Course Creativ	1,01 k	+1 605,1 %	39% direct	Essai gratuit, Payant	vs Course Creativ
4	Builder.io	608,18 k	+3,6 %	41% direct	Freemium, Subscription, Contact for Pricing	vs Builder.io
5	B12.io	335,81 k	+6,8 %	44% direct	Payant	vs B12.io
6	Framer	4,97 M	-5,7 %	55% direct	Freemium	vs Framer