
依功能與用途,為你挑選 12 款 LYKN 的替代工具。
| 排名 | 工具與標語 | 官方網域 | 每月造訪次數 | 月增幅 | 定價模式 | 主要市場 |
|---|
| 評分 |
|---|
| 比較 |
|---|
| ● | LYKN | lykn.io | 1137 | -4134 (-78.4%) | 免費增值 | 全球 | 4.2 | 簡介 |
| 1 | Notion | notion.com | 1.73億 | 20.12萬 (+0.1%) | 免費增值 | 美國 | 4.8 | 比較 |
| 2 | Delos Workers | delos.so | 9.05萬 | -1.71萬 (-15.9%) | 免費試用、付費、需聯絡報價 | 法國 | 4.2 | 比較 |
| 3 | TraeWork | trae.cn | 278.52萬 | -23.64萬 (-7.8%) | 需聯絡報價 | 中國 | 4.4 | 比較 |
| 4 | Manus | manus.im | 1919.58萬 | -33.98萬 (-1.7%) | 免費試用 | 巴西 | 4.6 | 比較 |
| 5 | Eigent AI | eigent.ai | 57.57萬 | 7873 (+1.4%) | 免費增值、免費試用、需聯絡報價 | 美國 | 4.4 | 比較 |
| 6 | n8n | n8n.io | 452.24萬 | -36.17萬 (-7.4%) | 免費增值 | 印度 | 4.7 | 比較 |
| 7 | Lindy | lindy.ai | 32.33萬 | -719 (-0.2%) | 免費增值、需聯絡報價 | 美國 | 4.2 | 比較 |
| 8 | Taskade | taskade.com | 53.97萬 | -5.63萬 (-9.4%) | 免費增值 | 美國 | 4.5 | 比較 |
| 9 | Abacus.AI | abacus.ai | 327.86萬 | -5.83萬 (-1.7%) | 需聯絡報價 | 美國 | 4.3 | 比較 |
| 10 | Relevance AI | relevanceai.com | 19.21萬 | -3.53萬 (-15.5%) | 免費試用、需聯絡報價 | 美國 | 4.5 | 比較 |
| 11 | Moxt | moxt.ai | 5.81萬 | -3.61萬 (-38.3%) | Credits-based (workspace free; pay for AI usage) | 中國 | 3.9 | 比較 |
| 12 | Vestra | vestra.ai | 1.34萬 | 3201 (+31.3%) | 免費增值、付費、需聯絡報價 | 印度 | 4.5 | 比較 |
擁有獨立身分、記憶與主動性的自主 AI 員工
Taskade is an AI workspace that turns a single prompt into working business apps, complete with AI agents, automations, databases, tasks and docs — no code required.
面向真實業務流程的無程式碼 AI 代理與團隊

Moxt is an AI-native collaboration workspace where human teammates and AI agents share the same documents, databases and context, so multi-step work can run unattended for days instead of minutes. It combines agent workflows, an agent progress board, mini internal apps and a shared memory layer, and is billed by AI usage rather than per seat.
Moxt is an AI-native collaboration workspace where human teammates and AI agents share the same documents, databases and context, so multi-step work can run unattended for days instead of minutes. It combines agent workflows, an agent progress board, mini internal apps and a shared memory layer, and is billed by AI usage rather than per seat.