Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. MindPeer records 177 monthly visits with 0% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Decision-ready intelligence reports with sources, ratings and gap registers
| Dimension / Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Official Domain | consensus.app | mindpeer.ai |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 6.01M (6,014,388) | 177 (177) |
| MoM Traffic Delta | -71.39K (-1.2%) | +177 (0%) |
| Primary Market & Share | 🇺🇸 United States (12.8%) | 🌐 Global (—) |
| Direct Visits / mo | 2.92M | 74 |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.4 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |
AI academic search engine for peer-reviewed science
Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
Decision-ready intelligence reports with sources, ratings and gap registers
Analysts brief the platform on the decision, audience and priorities before research begins, so the right questions drive the work.
MindPeer pulls answers from your uploaded documents and adds them to the report with sentence-level references.
Every answer and data point is tied to an evaluated source so conclusions can be defended, not just delivered.
Outputs carry confidence levels so readers know how strongly each conclusion is supported.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
SpecialistCovers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
Free / Open-sourceCompletely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus.
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
SpecialistA paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users
Free / Open-sourceAI research platform for reading, understanding and writing scientific papers
Free / Open-sourceAI research platform for reading, understanding and writing scientific papers
Free / Open-sourceAn AI work partner that turns a sentence into finished office deliverables
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus.
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
SpecialistThe AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source
AI-moderated customer interviews that turn conversations into decisions
AI-moderated customer interviews that turn conversations into decisions
Free / Open-sourceAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Free / Open-sourceAI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale
Free / Open-sourceChat with any PDF, video, or website and get cited answers in seconds
Free / Open-sourceTencent's AI knowledge steward for searching, reading, writing, and managing your own knowledge base.
Free / Open-sourceTencent's AI knowledge steward for searching, reading, writing, and managing your own knowledge base.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis.
