How do their growth rates compare?

Katalon has a month-over-month growth rate of -29.6%; Roark has +23.1%.

How does pricing compare?

Katalon: Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with a free tier for local authoring and execution, plus a 30-day free trial of paid features. Professional is roughly $1,800 per seat per year (around $150 per seat per month) with AI agents, MCP server access, desktop testing, parallel execution and CI/CD integrations. Enterprise is quoted on contract and adds SSO/SAML, SCIM provisioning, RBAC, audit logs, private cloud or on-premises deployment, hybrid licensing and premium support. Roark: Paid. Usage-based, billed in dollars with no seat licenses. Pay-as-you-go starts free with $50 of credit for work-email signups, then $0.15/min of simulation plus provider costs and $0.04/metric/min. Team is $500/month in included usage at lower rates ($0.10/min simulation, $0.02/metric/min) with 25 concurrent lines and 10 seats. Enterprise starts from $4,000/month committed, adds volume rates and controls such as SSO, data residency, DPA and SLA, and supports invoicing and POs.

What are alternatives to Katalon and Roark?

Other tools in related categories include KaneAI, Qase, Arize AI, Applitools Eyes, Future AGI.

Katalon vs Roark — Traffic (158.09K vs 9.23K), Pricing & Verdict

Open AI Tools

Katalon vs Roark — Traffic (158.09K vs 9.23K), Pricing & Verdict | Open AI Tools

Side-by-Side Traffic & Specification Matrix

Dimension / Metric	Katalon	Roark
Official Domain	katalon.com	roark.ai
Pricing Model	Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing	Paid
Monthly Visits	158.09K (158,090)	9.23K (9,226)
MoM Traffic Delta	-66.44K (-29.6%)	+1.73K (+23.1%)
Primary Market & Share	🇻🇳 Vietnam (18.3%)	🇺🇸 United States (75.7%)
Direct Visits / mo	87.97K	4.83K
User Rating	4.5	4.4
Supported Platforms	Website	Website

Katalon

AI-augmented quality platform for web, mobile, API and desktop testing

Katalon AI agents and self-healing

Generate automation scripts and test cases from natural language or tickets, get plain-language explanations, and let self-healing retry alternative locators when the UI changes so suites keep running through small front-end edits.

Unified multi-application testing

Cover web, API, mobile (Android and iOS) and Windows desktop applications inside one authoring environment, with record-and-playback, data-driven testing, BDD/Cucumber support and a dual-mode debugger.

TestOps management and analytics

Plan cycles, map requirements to cases, track coverage and flakiness, link defects in Jira, and gate releases using a shared live report that unifies manual, automated and AI-generated runs.

TestCloud execution environments

Run suites in parallel on real browsers, real iOS and Android devices, or your own CI runners and on-premise Runtime Engine, with lane-based parallel execution for faster coverage.

Strengths & Pros

+Supports no-code, low-code and full-code authoring in one product, so mixed-skill QA teams do not need separate tools
+Genuinely end-to-end scope: authoring, test management, cloud execution and production insights share a single system of record
+